Judiciary · Article III

Judiciary — Recent Opinions

Showing the 50 most recent  ·  69 on record

Row 01  c/o  cl-11034117  ·  ▲ 5 days
→ CourtListener
“Real” · Article III Published

FCC v. Brown

Author: Per Curiam
Filed: 2026-10-14
VFA SI Solution · Textualist Re-decision Awaiting Synthesis

A sourced SI textualist re-decision appears here once it passes automated checks.

Row 02  c/o  cl-10983722  ·  ▲ 24 days
→ CourtListener
“Real” · Article III Published

Department of Homeland Security v. League of Women Voters

Author: Per Curiam
Filed: 2026-09-25
VFA SI Solution · Textualist Re-decision Awaiting Synthesis

A sourced SI textualist re-decision appears here once it passes automated checks.

Row 03  c/o  cl-10984030  ·  ▲ 24 days
→ CourtListener
“Real” · Article III Published

People Not Politicians v. Onder

Author: Per Curiam
Filed: 2026-09-25
VFA SI Solution · Textualist Re-decision Awaiting Synthesis

A sourced SI textualist re-decision appears here once it passes automated checks.

Row 04  c/o  cl-10967483  ·  ▲ 45 days
→ CourtListener
“Real” · Article III Published

National Republican Congressional Committee v. Brown

Author: Per Curiam
Filed: 2026-09-04
VFA SI Solution · Textualist Re-decision Awaiting Synthesis

A sourced SI textualist re-decision appears here once it passes automated checks.

Row 05  c/o  cl-10963060  ·  ▲ 49 days
→ CourtListener
“Real” · Article III Published

National Park Service v. National Trust for Historic Preservation in the United States

Author: Per Curiam
Filed: 2026-08-31
VFA SI Solution · Textualist Re-decision Awaiting Synthesis

A sourced SI textualist re-decision appears here once it passes automated checks.

Row 06  c/o  cl-10956828  ·  ▲ 56 days
→ CourtListener
“Real” · Article III Published

Trump v. California

Author: Per Curiam
Filed: 2026-08-24
VFA SI Solution · Textualist Re-decision Awaiting Synthesis

A sourced SI textualist re-decision appears here once it passes automated checks.

Row 07  c/o  cl-10882240  ·  ▲ 111 days
→ CourtListener
“Real” · Article III Published

National Republican Senatorial Committee v. Federal Election Comm'n

Author: Brett Kavanaugh
Filed: 2026-06-30
Archived SI output (machine-generated) Archived

No editorial review recorded. This historical SI draft was machine-generated by software; check it against the original source.

FECA's political-party coordinated-expenditure limits are facially valid under the First Amendment as a regulation of campaign conduct, not speech.

Generated by VFA SI Solutions

Both Democrats and Republicans have an interest in election integrity and preventing corruption. A textualist holding that coordinated spending is regulable conduct under Article I, Section 4 honors the original meaning of the First Amendment without inventing new rights.…

Remedy: The lower court's judgment is affirmed. The… Precedent: Colorado II is overruled to the extent… Scope: This holding applies only to… 3 citations 3 departures from text
→ Read full re-decision
Row 08  c/o  cl-10883542  ·  ▲ 111 days
→ CourtListener
“Real” · Article III Published

Trump v. Barbara Revisions: 7/01/26

Author: John G. Roberts
Filed: 2026-06-30
Archived SI output (machine-generated) Archived

No editorial review recorded. This historical SI draft was machine-generated by software; check it against the original source.

Children born in the United States to parents unlawfully or temporarily present are not citizens under the Fourteenth Amendment unless Congress provides otherwise.

Generated by VFA SI Solutions

This holding honors Republican priorities of enforcing immigration laws and defining citizenship strictly, while also honoring Democratic priorities of textual fidelity and respect for the original meaning of the Constitution. It avoids judicial activism by grounding the…

Remedy: The preliminary injunction against Executive… Precedent: United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S.… Scope: This holding applies only to… 4 citations 3 departures from text
→ Read full re-decision
Row 09  c/o  cl-10882186  ·  ▲ 111 days
→ CourtListener
“Real” · Article III Published

West Virginia v. B. P. J.

Author: Brett Kavanaugh
Filed: 2026-06-30
Archived SI output (machine-generated) Archived

No editorial review recorded. This historical SI draft was machine-generated by software; check it against the original source.

State power to define women's sports by biological sex is constitutionally sound under the Tenth Amendment and Title IX as originally understood.

Generated by VFA SI Solutions

Democratic priorities honored: preserves state autonomy to expand women's sports participation and protect Title IX's original promise of equal athletic opportunity for biological females. Republican priorities honored: reinforces federalism (Tenth Amendment) and textualist…

Remedy: Judgment for States West Virginia and Idaho;… Precedent: The Court overrules any circuit… Scope: Applies only to state laws defining… 4 citations 3 departures from text
→ Read full re-decision
Row 010  c/o  cl-10882239  ·  ▲ 111 days
→ CourtListener
“Real” · Article III Published

Trump v. Barbara

Author: John G. Roberts
Filed: 2026-06-30
Archived SI output (machine-generated) Archived

No editorial review recorded. This historical SI draft was machine-generated by software; check it against the original source.

Children born in the United States to parents unlawfully or temporarily present are not 'subject to the jurisdiction' of the United States and thus not citizens at birth under the Fourteenth Amendment.

Generated by VFA SI Solutions

This textualist holding respects the original meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment, honors Congress's plenary power over naturalization under Article I, Section 8, Clause 4, and reserves to the political branches the authority to define the scope of birthright citizenship.…

Remedy: Reverse the district court's preliminary… Precedent: Overrule United States v. Wong Kim Ark… Scope: This holding applies to all children… 3 citations 3 departures from text
→ Read full re-decision
Row 011  c/o  cl-10881681  ·  ▲ 112 days
→ CourtListener
“Real” · Article III Published

Trump v. Slaughter

Author: John G. Roberts
Filed: 2026-06-29
Archived SI output (machine-generated) Archived

No editorial review recorded. This historical SI draft was machine-generated by software; check it against the original source.

The FTC's for-cause removal restriction is constitutional as applied to officers exercising quasi-legislative and quasi-judicial powers; the President may remove FTC members only for cause.

Generated by VFA SI Solutions

This holding honors Democratic priorities by preserving independent regulatory agencies as originally designed — a core Progressive and New Deal institutional architecture that Congress enacted to protect consumer protection, antitrust enforcement, and economic regulation from…

Remedy: The two removed FTC Commissioners are restored… Precedent: Humphrey's Executor v. United States… Scope: This holding applies to all… 9 citations 4 departures from text
→ Read full re-decision
Row 012  c/o  cl-10881683  ·  ▲ 112 days
→ CourtListener
“Real” · Article III Published

Chatrie v. United States

Author: Elana Kagan
Filed: 2026-06-29
Archived SI output (machine-generated) Archived

No editorial review recorded. This historical SI draft was machine-generated by software; check it against the original source.

Re-decided holding: The government's acquisition of Google Location History data via a geofence warrant does not violate the Fourth Amendment because the data was voluntarily disclosed to a third party and the warrant was supported by probable cause.

Generated by VFA SI Solutions

A textualist holding respects both Democratic concerns about privacy and Republican concerns about law enforcement. It honors Democratic priorities by requiring a warrant based on probable cause and particularity, ensuring judicial oversight. It honors Republican priorities by…

Remedy: The judgment of the Fourth Circuit is affirmed… Precedent: Carpenter v. United States (2018) is… Scope: This holding applies only to… 3 citations 3 departures from text
→ Read full re-decision
Row 013  c/o  cl-10881680  ·  ▲ 112 days
→ CourtListener
“Real” · Article III Published

Watson v. Republican National Committee

Author: Amy Coney Barrett
Filed: 2026-06-29
Archived SI output (machine-generated) Archived

No editorial review recorded. This historical SI draft was machine-generated by software; check it against the original source.

The federal election-day statutes do not require ballot receipt by election day; Mississippi's law is not preempted.

Generated by VFA SI Solutions

A textualist holding that respects the original meaning of 'election' as the act of voting, and leaves ballot-receipt deadlines to the states, honors both Democratic priorities (expanding voting access through absentee voting) and Republican priorities (upholding state control…

Remedy: Judgment of the Fifth Circuit reversed;… Precedent: No overruling necessary; the Court's… Scope: This holding is limited to the… 4 citations 2 departures from text
→ Read full re-decision
Row 014  c/o  cl-10881682  ·  ▲ 112 days
→ CourtListener
“Real” · Article III Published

Trump v. Cook

Author: John G. Roberts
Filed: 2026-06-29
Archived SI output (machine-generated) Archived

No editorial review recorded. This historical SI draft was machine-generated by software; check it against the original source.

The President has plenary removal power over Federal Reserve Governors under Article II; for-cause restriction is unconstitutional as applied to executive officers.

Generated by VFA SI Solutions

Democratic priorities: The decision respects the need for independent monetary policy by channeling it through legislative, not executive, means. Congress can still create an autonomous body under Article I to manage the money supply, insulating it from presidential…

Remedy: The preliminary injunction is vacated; Lisa… Precedent: Humphrey's Executor v. United States and… Scope: This holding applies only to the… 4 citations 2 departures from text
→ Read full re-decision
Row 015  c/o  cl-10880243  ·  ▲ 116 days
→ CourtListener
“Real” · Article III Published

Mullin v. Al Otro Lado

Author: Samuel Alito
Filed: 2026-06-25
Archived SI output (machine-generated) Archived

No editorial review recorded. This historical SI draft was machine-generated by software; check it against the original source.

An alien 'arrives in the United States' when he or she presents at a U.S. port of entry and seeks admission, regardless of physical crossing.

Generated by VFA SI Solutions

This holding honors Republican priorities by affirming the government's authority to control the border through reasonable metering and by adhering to the original understanding of statutory text. It honors Democratic priorities by ensuring that asylum seekers have a meaningful…

Remedy: The declaratory judgment that the metering… Precedent: This decision overrules any lower court… Scope: This holding applies solely to… 4 citations 3 departures from text
→ Read full re-decision
Row 016  c/o  cl-10880242  ·  ▲ 116 days
→ CourtListener
“Real” · Article III Published

Mullin v. Doe

Author: Samuel Alito
Filed: 2026-06-25
Archived SI output (machine-generated) Archived

No editorial review recorded. This historical SI draft was machine-generated by software; check it against the original source.

TPS termination is subject to judicial review for compliance with statutory procedure and constitutional rights, but the court must defer to the executive's substantive foreign-policy determination.

Generated by VFA SI Solutions

This textualist holding respects both Democratic priorities (preserving judicial review for procedural and constitutional claims, protecting against executive overreach) and Republican priorities (deference to executive foreign-policy judgment, limiting judicial second-guessing…

Remedy: The terminations of TPS for Syria and Haiti are… Precedent: Overrule the holding of McNary v.… Scope: This holding applies only to claims… 4 citations 3 departures from text
→ Read full re-decision
Row 017  c/o  cl-10880241  ·  ▲ 116 days
→ CourtListener
“Real” · Article III Published

Wolford v. Lopez

Author: Samuel Alito
Filed: 2026-06-25
Archived SI output (machine-generated) Archived

No editorial review recorded. This historical SI draft was machine-generated by software; check it against the original source.

Hawaii's law is constitutional: the Second Amendment does not override state property law requiring owner consent for firearms on private premises.

Generated by VFA SI Solutions

This holding honors Democratic priorities by upholding state police power to regulate firearms for public safety and property rights. It honors Republican priorities by preserving the Second Amendment's core right of self-defense (carrying on public property and with owner…

Remedy: The Ninth Circuit's decision upholding Hawaii's… Precedent: Bruen is overruled to the extent it… Scope: This holding applies only to laws… 4 citations 3 departures from text
→ Read full re-decision
Row 018  c/o  cl-10880244  ·  ▲ 116 days
→ CourtListener
“Real” · Article III Published

Monsanto v. Durnell

Author: Brett Kavanaugh
Filed: 2026-06-25
Archived SI output (machine-generated) Archived

No editorial review recorded. This historical SI draft was machine-generated by software; check it against the original source.

FIFRA does not preempt state-law failure-to-warn claims that seek damages for injuries caused by a pesticide, because such claims are not 'requirements for labeling or packaging' within the meaning of 7 U.S.C. §136v(b), and the Tenth Amendment reserves to the states the power to provide tort remedies for harm to health and safety.

Generated by VFA SI Solutions

A textualist holding that FIFRA does not preempt state tort claims honors both Democratic priorities (protecting public health and consumer safety through state remedies, preserving access to courts for injured individuals) and Republican priorities (respecting federalism and…

Remedy: The judgment of the Missouri Court of Appeals is… Precedent: Riegel v. Medtronic, Inc., 552 U.S. 312… Scope: This holding applies only to… 4 citations 4 departures from text
→ Read full re-decision
Row 019  c/o  cl-10878538  ·  ▲ 118 days
→ CourtListener
“Real” · Article III Published

Blanche v. Lau

Author: Clarence Thomas
Filed: 2026-06-23
Archived SI output (machine-generated) Archived

No editorial review recorded. This historical SI draft was machine-generated by software; check it against the original source.

Re-decided: A lawful permanent resident may be deemed 'seeking admission' only upon conviction (or clear and convincing evidence of commission) of a qualifying crime at the time of reentry.

Generated by VFA SI Solutions

This textualist holding respects both Democratic priorities (protecting due process rights and preventing arbitrary government action against individuals with settled permanent resident status) and Republican priorities (respecting strict textual readings of statutes without…

Remedy: The removal order is vacated. The case is… Precedent: The holding in Vartelas v. Holder, 566… Scope: This decision applies only to lawful… 5 citations 3 departures from text
→ Read full re-decision
Row 020  c/o  cl-10878536  ·  ▲ 118 days
→ CourtListener
“Real” · Article III Published

Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Corporación Cimex, S. A. (Cuba)

Author: Brett Kavanaugh
Filed: 2026-06-23
Archived SI output (machine-generated) Archived

No editorial review recorded. This historical SI draft was machine-generated by software; check it against the original source.

The Helms-Burton Act does not waive foreign sovereign immunity; the case is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction unless the Executive expressly consents.

Generated by VFA SI Solutions

This holding honors Republican constitutional priorities by restoring the original understanding that foreign sovereign immunity is a matter for the Executive, not implied by Congress. It also respects Democratic concerns about holding foreign state actors accountable by…

Remedy: Judgment for defendants; suit dismissed without… Precedent: Overrule Kirtz and its progeny to the… Scope: Limited to the Helms-Burton Act and… 6 citations 3 departures from text
→ Read full re-decision
Row 021  c/o  cl-10878535  ·  ▲ 118 days
→ CourtListener
“Real” · Article III Published

Landor v. Louisiana Dept of Corrections and Public Safety

Author: Neil Gorsuch
Filed: 2026-06-23
Archived SI output (machine-generated) Archived

No editorial review recorded. This historical SI draft was machine-generated by software; check it against the original source.

RLUIPA permits suits against state entities and officials in their official capacities, but not against state employees in their personal capacities, unless they individually consented.

Generated by VFA SI Solutions

A textualist holding that allows states to waive sovereign immunity for official-capacity suits respects state sovereignty (a Republican priority) while ensuring prisoners' religious exercise is protected through suits against the state entity (a Democratic priority). It avoids…

Remedy: Dismiss claims against individual officers in… Precedent: Overrule any case (e.g., portions of… Scope: This holding applies only to… 4 citations 3 departures from text
→ Read full re-decision
Row 022  c/o  cl-10879690  ·  ▲ 118 days
→ CourtListener
“Real” · Article III Published

Landor v. Louisiana Dept of Corrections and Public Safety Revisions: 6/24/26

Author: Neil Gorsuch
Filed: 2026-06-23
Archived SI output (machine-generated) Archived

No editorial review recorded. This historical SI draft was machine-generated by software; check it against the original source.

State employees are not personally liable under Spending Clause statutes unless they individually and knowingly consented.

Generated by VFA SI Solutions

A textualist holding respects the constitutional boundaries of federal power: Congress may not use spending conditions to regulate non-consenting individuals, preserving state sovereignty and federalism. Both Democratic and Republican traditions recognize limited government and…

Remedy: Judgment of the Fifth Circuit is affirmed; the… Precedent: This opinion overrules any lower-court… Scope: This holding applies exclusively to… 3 citations 3 departures from text
→ Read full re-decision
Row 023  c/o  cl-10878534  ·  ▲ 118 days
→ CourtListener
“Real” · Article III Published

Pung v. Isabella County

Author: Samuel Alito
Filed: 2026-06-23
VFA SI Solution · Textualist Re-decision Awaiting Synthesis

A sourced SI textualist re-decision appears here once it passes automated checks.

Row 024  c/o  cl-10878537  ·  ▲ 118 days
→ CourtListener
“Real” · Article III Published

Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Doe

Author: Amy Coney Barrett
Filed: 2026-06-23
Archived SI output (machine-generated) Archived

No editorial review recorded. This historical SI draft was machine-generated by software; check it against the original source.

Neither ATS nor TVPA Creates a Cause of Action; Congress Must Act Under Article I, §8, Cl. 10

Generated by VFA SI Solutions

This textualist holding honors conservative principles by confining federal courts to their constitutional role and respecting Congress's Article I power. It honors liberal priorities by preserving the legitimate need for accountability and inviting Congress to legislate with…

Remedy: Congress should enact a statute under Article I,… Precedent: Sosa v. Alvarez-Machain, 542 U.S. 692… Scope: This holding applies to all ATS… 3 citations 3 departures from text
→ Read full re-decision
Row 025  c/o  cl-10878009  ·  ▲ 119 days
→ CourtListener
“Real” · Article III Published

McCarthy v. Hernandez

Author: Per Curiam
Filed: 2026-06-22
Archived SI output (machine-generated) Archived

No editorial review recorded. This historical SI draft was machine-generated by software; check it against the original source.

Re-decided holding: The state trial court's refusal to instruct the jury on attenuation violates the Fifth Amendment's Self-Incrimination Clause as understood at ratification, and habeas relief was properly granted.

Generated by VFA SI Solutions

A textualist holding honors Democratic priorities by protecting defendants' Fifth Amendment rights against compelled self-incrimination and ensuring jury factfinding on critical issues. It honors Republican priorities by grounding the decision in the original meaning of the…

Remedy: The writ of habeas corpus is granted; the state… Precedent: Overrule the majority's implicit holding… Scope: This holding applies only to cases… 4 citations 3 departures from text
→ Read full re-decision
Row 026  c/o  cl-10877643  ·  ▲ 123 days
→ CourtListener
“Real” · Article III Published

T. M. v. University of Md. Medical System Corporation Revisions: 6/19/26

Author: Sonia Sotomayor
Filed: 2026-06-18
Archived SI output (machine-generated) Archived

No editorial review recorded. This historical SI draft was machine-generated by software; check it against the original source.

Rooker-Feldman applies only to final judgments from the highest state court in which review could be had, consistent with 28 U.S.C. §1257.

Generated by VFA SI Solutions

A textualist holding honors both Democratic priorities (protecting federal question jurisdiction and individual due process rights from procedural barriers) and Republican priorities (respecting federalism and state court autonomy by limiting the bar to final judgments, not…

Remedy: Vacate the Fourth Circuit's judgment and remand… Precedent: Overrule the expansion of Rooker-Feldman… Scope: This holding applies only to the… 5 citations 3 departures from text
→ Read full re-decision
Row 027  c/o  cl-10876933  ·  ▲ 123 days
→ CourtListener
“Real” · Article III Published

United States v. Hemani

Author: Neil Gorsuch
Filed: 2026-06-18
Archived SI output (machine-generated) Archived

No editorial review recorded. This historical SI draft was machine-generated by software; check it against the original source.

Held: Section 922(g)(3) is unconstitutional as applied to simple unlawful drug users without individualized dangerousness, but Congress may enact tailored legislation under its Commerce Clause power requiring drug testing or treatment as condition of gun ownership, subject to due process.

Generated by VFA SI Solutions

A textualist holding that requires individualized process respects both the Second Amendment rights of individuals and the public safety interest; it honors Republican concerns for constitutional rights and limited government by rejecting automatic bans, and Democratic concerns…

Remedy: Vacate the conviction and remand with… Precedent: Overrule any prior cases that upheld… Scope: The holding applies to 18 U.S.C.… 5 citations 3 departures from text
→ Read full re-decision
Row 028  c/o  cl-10876935  ·  ▲ 123 days
→ CourtListener
“Real” · Article III Published

Hunter v. United States

Author: Elana Kagan
Filed: 2026-06-18
Archived SI output (machine-generated) Archived

No editorial review recorded. This historical SI draft was machine-generated by software; check it against the original source.

An appeal waiver is enforceable as written, unless the plea itself was not knowing or voluntary under the Fifth and Sixth Amendments; no separate 'miscarriage of justice' exception exists.

Generated by VFA SI Solutions

A textualist holding that plea waivers are enforceable as contracts respects the parties' written agreement, limits judicial discretion, and avoids creating an open-ended equitable exception that invites litigation. Conservatives benefit from predictability and finality;…

Remedy: The Court of Appeals' dismissal of Hunter's… Precedent: Overrule the miscarriage-of-justice… Scope: This holding applies to all federal… 4 citations 5 departures from text
→ Read full re-decision
Row 029  c/o  cl-10876934  ·  ▲ 123 days
→ CourtListener
“Real” · Article III Published

T. M. v. University of Md. Medical System Corporation

Author: Sonia Sotomayor
Filed: 2026-06-18
Archived SI output (machine-generated) Archived

No editorial review recorded. This historical SI draft was machine-generated by software; check it against the original source.

Rooker-Feldman bars federal district court jurisdiction over direct attacks on state-court judgments regardless of finality under state appellate processes.

Generated by VFA SI Solutions

A textualist grounding of Rooker-Feldman serves both parties’ constitutional traditions: it respects state sovereignty and federalism (a conservative priority) while preventing federal courts from usurping the Supreme Court’s appellate role and protecting litigants from…

Remedy: Affirm the dismissal of T. M.’s federal suit for… Precedent: The Court’s prior Rooker-Feldman cases… Scope: Rooker-Feldman applies to any… 3 citations 2 departures from text
→ Read full re-decision
Row 030  c/o  cl-10877631  ·  ▲ 123 days
→ CourtListener
“Real” · Article III Published

Hunter v. United States Revisions: 6/19/26

Author: Elana Kagan
Filed: 2026-06-18
Archived SI output (machine-generated) Archived

No editorial review recorded. This historical SI draft was machine-generated by software; check it against the original source.

Re-decided holding: A knowing and voluntary appeal waiver in a plea agreement is enforceable according to its terms, subject only to the two explicit exceptions in the waiver itself (ineffective assistance of counsel and sentence exceeding statutory maximum).

Generated by VFA SI Solutions

A textualist holding respects the parties' contract and the district court's finding of knowing and voluntary waiver, which both conservative originalists and liberal advocates of procedural regularity can support. Conservatives value finality and respect for written…

Remedy: The Fifth Circuit's judgment dismissing the… Precedent: Overrule the 'miscarriage of justice'… Scope: This holding applies to all criminal… 3 citations 3 departures from text
→ Read full re-decision
Row 031  c/o  cl-10873665  ·  ▲ 130 days
→ CourtListener
“Real” · Article III Published

Abouammo v. United States

Author: Elana Kagan
Filed: 2026-06-11
Archived SI output (machine-generated) Archived

No editorial review recorded. This historical SI draft was machine-generated by software; check it against the original source.

Reversed: Venue for a §1519 violation lies only in the district where the falsification occurred.

Generated by VFA SI Solutions

A textualist, originalist holding protects both liberal and conservative constitutional priorities. The liberal priority of avoiding government overreach in federal prosecutions is served by limiting venue to the district where the defendant acted, preventing prosecutors from…

Remedy: The judgment of the Ninth Circuit is reversed,… Precedent: This decision overrules any circuit… Scope: Strictly confined to 18 U.S.C.… 3 citations 2 departures from text
→ Read full re-decision
Row 032  c/o  cl-10875833  ·  ▲ 130 days
→ CourtListener
“Real” · Article III Published

Abouammo v. United States Revisions: 6/16/26

Author: Elana Kagan
Filed: 2026-06-11
Archived SI output (machine-generated) Archived

No editorial review recorded. This historical SI draft was machine-generated by software; check it against the original source.

Venue for §1519 lies exclusively where the falsification occurred, not where the investigation is located.

Generated by VFA SI Solutions

This holding honors Democratic priorities by protecting defendants' fair-trial rights against prosecutorial forum-shopping, ensuring that venue is based on the crime's location, not the government's convenience. It honors Republican priorities by requiring strict adherence to…

Remedy: Conviction reversed; case remanded for transfer… Precedent: Overrule any prior circuit precedent… Scope: Limited to §1519 and any statute… 3 citations 2 departures from text
→ Read full re-decision
Row 033  c/o  cl-10873663  ·  ▲ 130 days
→ CourtListener
“Real” · Article III Published

Keathley v. Buddy Ayers Construction, Inc.

Author: Ketanji Brown Jackson
Filed: 2026-06-11
Archived SI output (machine-generated) Archived

No editorial review recorded. This historical SI draft was machine-generated by software; check it against the original source.

Judicial estoppel does not bar a debtor's state-law tort claim for failure to disclose in bankruptcy; the Bankruptcy Code's disclosure requirements are enforced through its own sanctions, not through dismissal of a separate lawsuit.

Generated by VFA SI Solutions

This textualist holding honors both Democratic priorities (protecting individual tort victims from procedural forfeiture of their day in court) and Republican priorities (limiting federal judicial power to its constitutional boundaries, enforcing the Bankruptcy Code through its…

Remedy: Vacate the Fifth Circuit's judgment and remand… Precedent: Overrule any prior circuit precedent… Scope: This holding applies only to… 6 citations 3 departures from text
→ Read full re-decision
Row 034  c/o  cl-10873664  ·  ▲ 130 days
→ CourtListener
“Real” · Article III Published

FS Credit Opportunities Corp. v. Saba Capital Master Fund, Ltd.

Author: Amy Coney Barrett
Filed: 2026-06-11
Archived SI output (machine-generated) Archived

No editorial review recorded. This historical SI draft was machine-generated by software; check it against the original source.

Section 47(b) of the Investment Company Act provides an express private right of action for rescission of contracts violating the Act, consistent with common-law rescission.

Generated by VFA SI Solutions

The textualist reading of Section 47(b) honors the plain meaning of 'at the instance of any party' as a traditional remedy, avoiding judicial legislation while respecting state law (Tenth Amendment) and common law. Democratic priorities: protects shareholders and retail…

Remedy: Private parties may sue for rescission of… Precedent: Overrule Alexander v. Sandoval to the… Scope: This holding applies to Section… 3 citations 3 departures from text
→ Read full re-decision
Row 035  c/o  cl-10870061  ·  ▲ 137 days
→ CourtListener
“Real” · Article III Published

FCC v. AT&T

Author: John G. Roberts
Filed: 2026-06-04
Archived SI output (machine-generated) Archived

No editorial review recorded. This historical SI draft was machine-generated by software; check it against the original source.

FCC forfeiture orders under §503(b)(4) that determine liability and assess a penalty must be tried before a jury in federal court, or the Commission must restructure its proceedings to provide a jury trial before any penalty is imposed.

Generated by VFA SI Solutions

A textualist holding honors both Democratic and Republican constitutional traditions. For Democrats, it protects individual rights against administrative overreach and ensures procedural fairness for regulated parties, including consumers and small businesses. For Republicans,…

Remedy: The FCC's forfeiture orders under §503(b)(4) are… Precedent: Overrule any precedent (e.g., Meeker,… Scope: This holding applies to all federal… 3 citations 3 departures from text
→ Read full re-decision
Row 036  c/o  cl-10870059  ·  ▲ 137 days
→ CourtListener
“Real” · Article III Published

Sripetch v. SEC

Author: Neil Gorsuch
Filed: 2026-06-04
Archived SI output (machine-generated) Archived

No editorial review recorded. This historical SI draft was machine-generated by software; check it against the original source.

SEC disgorgement requires proof of pecuniary loss to investors to remain within traditional equitable relief under Article III and the Seventh Amendment.

Generated by VFA SI Solutions

A textualist holding requiring pecuniary loss honors both Democratic priorities (protecting investors from fraud by ensuring disgorgement is tied to actual harm) and Republican priorities (limiting federal agency power under the Tenth Amendment and preserving jury trial rights…

Remedy: The judgment of the Ninth Circuit is reversed.… Precedent: Liu v. SEC, 591 U.S. 71 (2020), is… Scope: This holding applies only to SEC… 5 citations 3 departures from text
→ Read full re-decision
Row 037  c/o  cl-10870060  ·  ▲ 137 days
→ CourtListener
“Real” · Article III Published

Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. v. Amarin Pharma, Inc.

Author: Ketanji Brown Jackson
Filed: 2026-06-04
VFA SI Solution · Textualist Re-decision Awaiting Synthesis

A sourced SI textualist re-decision appears here once it passes automated checks.

Row 038  c/o  cl-10869022  ·  ▲ 139 days
→ CourtListener
“Real” · Article III Published

Allen v. Milligan

Author: Per Curiam
Filed: 2026-06-02
Archived SI output (machine-generated) Archived

No editorial review recorded. This historical SI draft was machine-generated by software; check it against the original source.

Re-decided holding: Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, as applied through the Fifteenth Amendment, requires states to draw districts that do not dilute minority voting strength, but the remedy must be race-neutral in its criteria and limited to ensuring equal electoral opportunity, not proportional representation.

Generated by VFA SI Solutions

A textualist holding that enforces the Fifteenth Amendment's plain text against racial vote dilution honors both parties' constitutional traditions. For Democrats, it protects minority voting rights and ensures equal electoral opportunity. For Republicans, it limits federal…

Remedy: The district court's injunction is affirmed.… Precedent: Callais v. Louisiana (2026) is overruled… Scope: This holding applies only to Section… 5 citations 3 departures from text
→ Read full re-decision
Row 039  c/o  cl-10867983  ·  ▲ 140 days
→ CourtListener
“Real” · Article III Published

Whitton v. Dixon

Author: Per Curiam
Filed: 2026-06-01
Archived SI output (machine-generated) Archived

No editorial review recorded. This historical SI draft was machine-generated by software; check it against the original source.

Habeas review of harmless error under § 2254(d)(2) must be confined to the evidence presented to the jury at trial; post-trial evidence cannot be considered.

Generated by VFA SI Solutions

A textualist holding honors both Democratic concerns about prosecutorial misconduct (by requiring that the state's error be assessed based on what the jury actually heard) and Republican concerns about federalism and finality (by limiting federal habeas review to the trial…

Remedy: Vacate the Eleventh Circuit's judgment and… Precedent: Overrule Brecht v. Abrahamson (1993) to… Scope: This holding applies to all federal… 4 citations 3 departures from text
→ Read full re-decision
Row 040  c/o  cl-10865526  ·  ▲ 144 days
→ CourtListener
“Real” · Article III Published

Flowers Foods, Inc. v. Brock

Author: Neil Gorsuch
Filed: 2026-05-28
Archived SI output (machine-generated) Archived

No editorial review recorded. This historical SI draft was machine-generated by software; check it against the original source.

Re-decided holding: The FAA §1 exemption covers workers on intrastate legs of interstate journeys, consistent with the original meaning of 'engaged in interstate commerce.'

Generated by VFA SI Solutions

A textualist holding honors both parties' constitutional traditions: Democrats may appreciate the protection of workers' rights to litigate rather than be forced into arbitration, while Republicans may appreciate the clear, originalist rule based on the statute's text and…

Remedy: The judgment of the Tenth Circuit is affirmed.… Precedent: This holding overrules any lower court… Scope: This holding applies only to workers… 3 citations 2 departures from text
→ Read full re-decision
Row 041  c/o  cl-10865524  ·  ▲ 144 days
→ CourtListener
“Real” · Article III Published

Rutherford v. United States

Author: Amy Coney Barrett
Filed: 2026-05-28
Archived SI output (machine-generated) Archived

No editorial review recorded. This historical SI draft was machine-generated by software; check it against the original source.

Nonretroactive sentencing amendments may constitute an 'extraordinary and compelling reason' under §3582(c)(1)(A)(i) when the resulting disparity is extreme, unjustified, and not based solely on congressional intent to deny relief.

Generated by VFA SI Solutions

Textualists insist on following the ordinary meaning of the statute, which does not carve out nonretroactive sentencing changes. Compassionate release is a safety valve for extreme injustice; excluding all nonretroactive changes would lock in unjust sentences that Congress…

Remedy: Reverse and remand. District courts are… Precedent: Overrule the categorical rule in the… Scope: Limited to 18 U.S.C.… 8 citations 3 departures from text
→ Read full re-decision
Row 042  c/o  cl-10865527  ·  ▲ 144 days
→ CourtListener
“Real” · Article III Published

Fernandez v. United States

Author: Amy Coney Barrett
Filed: 2026-05-28
Archived SI output (machine-generated) Archived

No editorial review recorded. This historical SI draft was machine-generated by software; check it against the original source.

A prisoner may raise a credible claim of actual innocence in a compassionate release motion under §3582(c)(1)(A), but only if the claim is supported by new evidence not previously available and the prisoner shows diligence.

Generated by VFA SI Solutions

A textualist holding that allows innocence claims under §3582 honors both parties' constitutional traditions. For Democrats, it protects due process and prevents wrongful imprisonment, a core civil-rights concern. For Republicans, it respects the original meaning of the…

Remedy: The district court must consider Fernandez's… Precedent: Overrule the categorical rule that §3582… Scope: This holding applies only to claims… 3 citations 2 departures from text
→ Read full re-decision
Row 043  c/o  cl-10865525  ·  ▲ 144 days
→ CourtListener
“Real” · Article III Published

Pitchford v. Cain

Author: Brett Kavanaugh
Filed: 2026-05-28
Archived SI output (machine-generated) Archived

No editorial review recorded. This historical SI draft was machine-generated by software; check it against the original source.

The Equal Protection Clause does not require a trial court to conduct a three-step Batson inquiry; peremptory challenges are not subject to judicial review for racial bias absent a showing of systematic exclusion.

Generated by VFA SI Solutions

A textualist holding restores the original meaning of the Equal Protection Clause and respects the common law tradition of peremptory challenges. It honors Democratic priorities by preserving a remedy for systematic racial discrimination (through Swain claims) and Republican…

Remedy: Denial of habeas relief; conviction and sentence… Precedent: Batson v. Kentucky (1986) and subsequent… Scope: This holding applies to all… 3 citations 3 departures from text
→ Read full re-decision
Row 044  c/o  cl-10864190  ·  ▲ 146 days
→ CourtListener
“Real” · Article III Published

Margolin v. NAIJ

Author: Per Curiam
Filed: 2026-05-26
Archived SI output (machine-generated) Archived

No editorial review recorded. This historical SI draft was machine-generated by software; check it against the original source.

Re-decided holding: The Fourth Circuit did not violate Article III's case-or-controversy requirement; its remand for factfinding was a permissible exercise of its appellate jurisdiction, and the CSRA's exclusivity is not a jurisdictional bar based on text or original meaning.

Generated by VFA SI Solutions

A textualist holding honors both parties' constitutional traditions: Democratic priorities include protecting free speech for government employees and ensuring judicial review of constitutional claims; Republican priorities include limiting federal power to what the…

Remedy: The district court must hear the First and Fifth… Precedent: Overrule Elgin v. Department of Treasury… Scope: Applies only to federal employees… 5 citations 2 departures from text
→ Read full re-decision
Row 045  c/o  cl-10862762  ·  ▲ 151 days
→ CourtListener
“Real” · Article III Published

M & K Employee Solutions, Inc. v. Trustees of IAM Nat. Pension

Author: Ketanji Brown Jackson
Filed: 2026-05-21
VFA SI Solution · Textualist Re-decision Re-decided

Pension Withdrawal Liability Notice and Review Proposal

Generated by VFA SI Solutions

VFA assesses this draft offers Republicans and conservatives fixed statutory text, predictable process, capped spending, and a check on backdated increases through notice and review, while it offers Democrats and progressives sound funding of underfunded plans, protection of…

Response: Congress could require a plan that changes… 4 citations 2 open questions
→ Read the full Solution
Row 046  c/o  cl-10862763  ·  ▲ 151 days
→ CourtListener
“Real” · Article III Published

Havana Docks Corp. v. Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd.

Author: Clarence Thomas
Filed: 2026-05-21
VFA SI Solution · Textualist Re-decision Re-decided

Title III Clarity, Notice, and Reporting Act

Generated by VFA SI Solutions

VFA assesses this approach gives Republicans and conservatives a gain in firm support for property rights, compensation for confiscation, pressure on the Cuban government, and fiscal restraint through a capped fund and sunset. VFA assesses it gives Democrats and progressives a…

Response: Congress could clarify the trafficking… 4 citations 2 open questions
→ Read the full Solution
Row 047  c/o  cl-10862764  ·  ▲ 151 days
→ CourtListener
“Real” · Article III Published

Hamm v. Smith

Author: Per Curiam
Filed: 2026-05-21
VFA SI Solution · Textualist Re-decision Re-decided

Atkins Hearing Clarity and State Choice Act

Generated by VFA SI Solutions

VFA assesses this proposal gives Republicans and conservatives a concrete gain in public safety, victims' interests, finality, fiscal restraint, and state control over criminal procedure, while it gives Democrats and progressives a concrete gain in due process, accuracy in…

Response: Congress could fund a voluntary state model for… 6 citations 3 open questions
→ Read the full Solution
Row 048  c/o  cl-10858761  ·  ▲ 158 days
→ CourtListener
“Real” · Article III Published

Jules v. Andre Balazs Properties

Author: Sonia Sotomayor
Filed: 2026-05-14
Archived SI output (machine-generated) Archived

No editorial review recorded. This historical SI draft was machine-generated by software; check it against the original source.

Yes; Article III jurisdiction persists over §9 and §10 motions in a stayed federal-question case.

Generated by VFA SI Solutions

Textualism restores original federal court role in resolving disputes under U.S. laws—honoring Democratic traditions of federal protections for workers' claims (Fifth Amendment due process in Jules's discrimination suit) and Republican originalist limits on jurisdiction…

Remedy: Affirm district court confirmation of the award… Precedent: Ignores post-1900 precedents; rests… Scope: Limited to §3-stayed cases with… 4 citations 2 departures from text
→ Read full re-decision
Row 049  c/o  cl-10858760  ·  ▲ 158 days
→ CourtListener
“Real” · Article III Published

Montgomery v. Caribe Transport II, LLC

Author: Amy Coney Barrett
Filed: 2026-05-14
VFA SI Solution · Textualist Re-decision Awaiting Synthesis

A sourced SI textualist re-decision appears here once it passes automated checks.

Row 050  c/o  cl-10850133  ·  ▲ 173 days
→ CourtListener
“Real” · Article III Published

First Choice Women's Resource Centers, Inc. v. Davenport

Author: Neil Gorsuch
Filed: 2026-04-29
VFA SI Solution · Textualist Re-decision Awaiting Synthesis

A sourced SI textualist re-decision appears here once it passes automated checks.

← Back to the Republic