U.S. Constitution · Amendment XIV, Section 1 · ratified 1868-07-09
Citizenship Clause; Privileges or Immunities Clause; Due Process Clause; Equal Protection Clause
Alerts when a new grade, SI Solution or Think Tank idea cites Amend. XIV, § 1.
Also known as: Citizenship Clause · Privileges or Immunities Clause · Due Process Clause · Equal Protection Clause
Live in the VFA record
Cited in 3 SI Solutions and 20 grades this month.
52 public items cite this provision · 23 in October 2026 (last month: 3)
Citations per week, last 12 weeks
The text
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
National Archives transcription (public domain; original spelling and capitalization). archives.gov
SI explainer
An explainer for this provision is in the queue. It appears here once it passes the SI Editorial Standard’s automated checks. The text, founding-era sources and live citations below are complete.
In the founders’ words
- “No State shall violate the equal rights of conscience, or the freedom of the press, or the trial by jury in criminal cases.” James Madison, James Madison, Speech Proposing Amendments, House of Representatives, June 8, 1789 (Annals of Congress 1:448-60) (1789-06-08)
- “To these privileges and immunities, whatever they may be—for they are not and cannot be fully defined in their entire extent and precise nature—to these should be added the personal rights guaranteed and secured by the first eight amendments of the Constitution;” Jacob M. Howard, Sen. Jacob M. Howard, Speech Introducing the Fourteenth Amendment, Senate, May 23, 1866 (Congressional Globe, 39th Cong., 1st Sess., 2764-66) (1866-05-23)
- “This abolishes all class legislation in the states and does away with the injustice of subjecting one caste of persons to a code not applicable to another. It prohibits the hanging of a black man for a crime for which the white man is not to be hanged.” Jacob M. Howard, Sen. Jacob M. Howard, Speech Introducing the Fourteenth Amendment, Senate, May 23, 1866 (Congressional Globe, 39th Cong., 1st Sess., 2764-66) (1866-05-23)
- “But, sir, the first section of the proposed amendment does not give to either of these classes the right of voting. The right of suffrage is not, in law, one of the privileges or immunities thus secured by the Constitution. It is merely the creature of law.” Jacob M. Howard, Sen. Jacob M. Howard, Speech Introducing the Fourteenth Amendment, Senate, May 23, 1866 (Congressional Globe, 39th Cong., 1st Sess., 2764-66) (1866-05-23)
- “The amendment is exactly in the language of the Constitution; that is to say, it secures to the citizens of each of the States all the privileges and immunities of citizens of the several States. It is not to transfer the laws of one State to another State at all. It is to secure to the citizen of each State all the privileges and immunities of citizens of the United States in the several States. If the State laws do not interfere, those immunities follow under the Constitution.” John A. Bingham; Giles W. Hotchkiss, House of Representatives, Debate on Bingham's Proposed Amendment, February 28, 1866 (Congressional Globe, 39th Cong., 1st Sess.) (1866-02-28)
- “Now, I desire that the very privileges for which the gentleman is contending shall be secured to the citizens; but I want them secured by a constitutional amendment that legislation cannot override.” John A. Bingham; Giles W. Hotchkiss, House of Representatives, Debate on Bingham's Proposed Amendment, February 28, 1866 (Congressional Globe, 39th Cong., 1st Sess.) (1866-02-28)
- “But the Constitution limits only the action of Congress, and is not a limitation on the States. This amendment supplies that defect, and allows Congress to correct the unjust legislation of the States, so far that the law which operates upon one man shall operate equally upon all.” Thaddeus Stevens; James A. Garfield, House of Representatives, Debate on the Fourteenth Amendment, May 8, 1866 (Congressional Globe, 39th Cong., 1st Sess., 2459, 2462) (1866-05-08)
- “It is precisely for that reason that we propose to lift that great and good law above the reach of political strife, beyond the reach of the plots and machinations of any party.” Thaddeus Stevens; James A. Garfield, House of Representatives, Debate on the Fourteenth Amendment, May 8, 1866 (Congressional Globe, 39th Cong., 1st Sess., 2459, 2462) (1866-05-08)
- “It is the power in the people, in the whole people of the United States, by express authority of the Constitution to do that by congressional enactment which hitherto they have not had the power to do, and have never even attempted to do; that is, to protect by national law the privileges and immunities of all the citizens of the Republic and the inborn rights of every person within its jurisdiction whenever the same shall be abridged or denied by the unconstitutional acts of any State.” John A. Bingham, House of Representatives, Debate on the Fourteenth Amendment, May 10, 1866 (Congressional Globe, 39th Cong., 1st Sess., 2542) (1866-05-10)
- “This amendment takes from no State any right that ever pertained to it. No State ever had the right, under the forms of law or otherwise, to deny to any freeman the equal protection of the laws or to abridge the privileges or immunities of any citizen of the Republic, although many of them have assumed and exercised the power, and that without remedy.” John A. Bingham, House of Representatives, Debate on the Fourteenth Amendment, May 10, 1866 (Congressional Globe, 39th Cong., 1st Sess., 2542) (1866-05-10)
Public-domain primary sources, quoted word for word and checked against the linked text.
Leading Supreme Court cases
- Slaughter-House Cases, 83 U.S. 36 (1873)
- United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542 (1876)
- Strauder v. West Virginia, 100 U.S. 303 (1880)
- Civil Rights Cases, 109 U.S. 3 (1883)
- Hurtado v. California, 110 U.S. 516 (1884)
- Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356 (1886)
- Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537 (1896) · repudiated by Brown v. Board of Education (1954) and later decisions
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy R. Co. v. Chicago, 166 U.S. 226 (1897)
- United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898)
- Lochner v. New York, 198 U.S. 45 (1905) · its liberty-of-contract approach was repudiated in West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish (1937) and later decisions
- Ex parte Young, 209 U.S. 123 (1908)
- Meyer v. Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390 (1923)
- Gitlow v. New York, 268 U.S. 652 (1925)
- Pierce v. Society of Sisters, 268 U.S. 510 (1925)
- Buck v. Bell, 274 U.S. 200 (1927)
- Whitney v. California, 274 U.S. 357 (1927) · overruled by Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969)
- Powell v. Alabama, 287 U.S. 45 (1932)
- De Jonge v. Oregon, 299 U.S. 353 (1937)
- Palko v. Connecticut, 302 U.S. 319 (1937) · overruled by Benton v. Maryland (1969)
- West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish, 300 U.S. 379 (1937)
Cited in the VFA record
“Where this provision is cited”
SI Solutions (12)
-
Neutral Notice and Consent for Youth Counseling
2026-10-16
-
Corrected Proclamation Confirming National Angel Family Day as Ceremonial and Within Article II
2026-10-16
-
Atkins Hearing Clarity and State Choice Act
2026-10-16
-
American Citizenship Integrity Act of 2026
2026-08-13
-
Birth Tourism Deterrence and Visa Integrity Act of 2026
2026-08-13
-
Children born in the United States to parents unlawfully or temporarily present are not citizens under the Fourteenth Amendment unless Congress provides otherwise.
2026-07-02
-
Children born in the United States to parents unlawfully or temporarily present are not 'subject to the jurisdiction' of the United States and thus not citizens at birth under the Fourteenth Amendment
2026-07-01
-
State power to define women's sports by biological sex is constitutionally sound under the Tenth Amendment and Title IX as originally understood.
2026-07-01
-
The Equal Protection Clause does not require a trial court to conduct a three-step Batson inquiry; peremptory challenges are not subject to judicial review for racial bias absent a showing of systemat
2026-05-29
-
Olivier's suit for prospective injunctive relief is not barred by the common-law rule against collateral attack on final judgments, but the First Amendment claim must be evaluated on its merits under
2026-05-24
-
Federal Election Citizenship Verification Act of 2026
2026-05-15
-
Joint Resolution Proposing Amendment to Clarify and Protect Birthright Citizenship
2026-05-14
grades (20)
-
H.R. 2616: Stopping Indoctrination and Protecting Kids Act
2026-10-08 · Grade A (Constitutional)
-
H.R. 8646: Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agency Appropriations Act, 2027
2026-10-08 · Grade B (Mostly sound)
-
S. 254: ARTIST Act
2026-10-08 · Grade A (Constitutional)
-
S. 1003: Lulu’s Law
2026-10-08 · Grade A (Constitutional)
-
H.R. 8897: Improving Travel for American Families Act
2026-10-08 · Grade A (Constitutional)
-
H.R. 5587: HEATS Act
2026-10-08 · Grade A (Constitutional)
-
H.J.Res. 1: Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to require that the Supreme Court of the United States be composed of nine justices.
2026-10-08 · Grade A (Constitutional)
-
S.J.Res. 28: A joint resolution disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to "Defining Larger Participants of a Market for General-Use Digital Consumer Pa
2026-10-08 · Grade A (Constitutional)
-
H.J.Res. 88: Providing congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "California State Motor Vehicl
2026-10-08 · Grade A (Constitutional)
-
H.J.Res. 87: Providing congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "California State Motor Vehicl
2026-10-08 · Grade A (Constitutional)
-
Executive Order 14242: Improving Education Outcomes by Empowering Parents, States, and Communities
2026-10-08 · Grade A (Constitutional)
-
Executive Order 14268: Reforming Foreign Defense Sales To Improve Speed and Accountability
2026-10-08 · Grade A (Constitutional)
-
Executive Order 14274: Restoring Common Sense to Federal Office Space Management
2026-10-08 · Grade A (Constitutional)
-
Executive Order 14279: Reforming Accreditation To Strengthen Higher Education
2026-10-08 · Grade A (Constitutional)
-
Executive Order 14288: Strengthening and Unleashing America's Law Enforcement To Pursue Criminals and Protect Innocent Citizens
2026-10-08 · Grade D (Likely unconstitutional)
-
Executive Order 14319: Preventing Woke AI in the Federal Government
2026-10-08 · Grade A (Constitutional)
-
Executive Order 14321: Ending Crime and Disorder on America's Streets
2026-10-08 · Grade D (Likely unconstitutional)
-
Executive Order 14328: Establishing the White House Task Force on the 2028 Summer Olympics
2026-10-08 · Grade A (Constitutional)
-
H.R. 9340: Ratepayer Protection Act
2026-10-08 · Grade A (Constitutional)
-
H.R. 2283: Recognizing Community Organizations for Veteran Engagement and Recovery Act
2026-10-08 · Grade A (Constitutional)
roll-call votes (20)
-
Senate roll call 254 (2026): On Cloture on the Motion to Proceed on H.R. 9340
2026-09-30 · Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected · official record
-
House roll call 312 (2026): On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended on H R 9340
2026-09-16 · Passed · official record
-
House roll call 293 (2026): On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass on H J RES 1
2026-09-02 · Failed · official record
-
House roll call 235 (2026): On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended on H R 8897
2026-07-13 · Passed · official record
-
House roll call 204 (2026): On Motion to Recommit on H R 8646
2026-06-04 · Failed · official record
-
House roll call 205 (2026): On Passage on H R 8646
2026-06-04 · Passed · official record
-
House roll call 193 (2026): On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass on S 254
2026-06-03 · Passed · official record
-
House roll call 181 (2026): On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass on S 1003
2026-05-20 · Passed · official record
-
House roll call 183 (2026): On Motion to Recommit on H R 2616
2026-05-20 · Failed · official record
-
House roll call 184 (2026): On Passage on H R 2616
2026-05-20 · Passed · official record
-
House roll call 137 (2026): On Passage on H R 5587
2026-04-23 · Passed · official record
-
Senate roll call 277 (2025): On the Joint Resolution on H.J.Res. 88
2025-05-22 · Joint Resolution Passed · official record
-
Senate roll call 278 (2025): On the Motion to Proceed on H.J.Res. 87
2025-05-22 · Motion to Proceed Agreed to · official record
-
Senate roll call 279 (2025): On the Joint Resolution on H.J.Res. 87
2025-05-22 · Joint Resolution Passed · official record
-
Senate roll call 276 (2025): On the Motion to Proceed on H.J.Res. 88
2025-05-21 · Motion to Proceed Agreed to · official record
-
House roll call 114 (2025): On Passage on H J RES 88
2025-05-01 · Passed · official record
-
House roll call 111 (2025): On Passage on H J RES 87
2025-04-30 · Passed · official record
-
House roll call 95 (2025): On Passage on S J RES 28
2025-04-09 · Passed · official record
-
Senate roll call 106 (2025): On the Joint Resolution on S.J.Res. 28
2025-03-05 · Joint Resolution Passed · official record
-
Senate roll call 103 (2025): On the Motion to Proceed on S.J.Res. 28
2025-03-04 · Motion to Proceed Agreed to · official record
Roll-call votes are listed when the measure voted on has a current Constitution Index grade citing this provision. Counts include only published items.
Cite this page
Values for America Constitution Explorer, https://www.valuesforamerica.com/constitution (text: National Archives transcription, public domain), Amendment XIV, Section 1, https://www.valuesforamerica.com/constitution/amendment-14/section-1
Data: this provision as JSON.