Archived SI output (machine-generated)

Immigration Detention Commissary Fair Pricing Act of 2025

Mode: Bill Generated by VFA SI Solutions Drafted: 2026.08.16

Archived SI output (machine-generated) · No editorial review recorded

This historical SI draft was machine-generated by software and has no editorial review time on record. Verify its factual and legal claims against the original source before relying on it.

Real bill

Stop ICE Price Gouging Act

External ID
HR/119/10105
Policy area
Immigration
Latest action
2026-08-14
→ View original
Archived SI draft (machine-generated)

Immigration Detention Commissary Fair Pricing Act of 2025

Prevent price gouging at immigration detention facility commissaries by capping prices on items sold to detainees.

Constitutional concerns with the original

  1. Direct price caps may exceed Congress's enumerated powers if applied to private vendors operating on federal property, as price regulation is traditionally a state police power.
  2. Potential Fifth Amendment takings issue if caps are set below cost without compensation.
  3. Possible violation of the Tenth Amendment if the cap is applied to state-run detention facilities under federal contract.

Solution text

Section 1. Short Title. This Act may be cited as the 'Immigration Detention Commissary Fair Pricing Act of 2025'. Section 2. Purpose. The purpose of this Act is to ensure that items sold at commissaries in immigration detention facilities are priced at no more than the average retail price for comparable items in the local geographic area, thereby preventing exploitation of detainees while respecting market mechanisms and federal contracting standards. Section 3. Contractual Requirement. Any contract entered into or renewed by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) for the operation of an immigration detention facility, whether directly operated or through a private contractor, shall include a clause requiring that the prices of all items sold at the facility's commissary not exceed the average retail price for such items in the local area, as determined by a quarterly survey conducted by the DHS Office of Inspector General (OIG). The OIG shall use publicly available data from reputable sources such as the Bureau of Labor Statistics or local retail surveys. Section 4. Oversight and Enforcement. The DHS OIG shall review commissary pricing annually and report to Congress on compliance. Any contractor found to have willfully violated the pricing requirement shall be subject to a civil penalty of up to $10,000 per violation, and the contract may be terminated for cause. Detainees may submit complaints through a designated hotline, and the OIG shall investigate substantiated complaints within 60 days. Section 5. Funding. The costs of implementing this Act shall be covered by existing DHS appropriations, with a cap of $2 million per fiscal year for OIG oversight activities. No additional funds are authorized. Section 6. Sunset. This Act shall expire five years after the date of enactment, unless reauthorized by Congress. Section 7. Effective Date. This Act shall take effect 180 days after enactment.

Operative provisions

funding source
Existing DHS appropriations, capped at $2 million per fiscal year for OIG oversight.
funding amount
$2 million per fiscal year (capped).
sunset years
5
oversight body
DHS Office of Inspector General (OIG).
enforcement mechanism
Civil penalties up to $10,000 per violation; contract termination for cause; detainee complaint hotline.
effective date
180 days after enactment.

Bipartisan rationale

Democratic priorities: Protects vulnerable detainees from exploitative pricing and ensures basic fairness in federal detention. Republican priorities: Avoids direct price controls, uses market-based pricing tied to local averages, limits federal spending to existing appropriations, and includes a sunset to prevent permanent government overreach.

Constitutional citations

  • → Article I, Section 8, Clause 4 (naturalization and immigration power)
  • → Article I, Section 8, Clause 17 (power over federal enclaves)
  • → Article I, Section 8, Clause 18 (necessary and proper clause)
  • → Fifth Amendment (due process and takings clause, addressed by using market-based pricing)

Article I, Section 8, Clause 4 Article I, Section 8, Clause 17 Article I, Section 8, Clause 18 Amendment V

Report an error in this Solution
No account needed. Or email hello@valuesforamerica.com. How reports are handled.

Share card

1200×675 PNG for X, Threads, LinkedIn and messages. Free to share with a link back to this page.

Citizen Consensus

“Do you support this VFA SI Solution?”

One vote per verified account; you can change it any time. Only verified accounts count, results publish once 30 verified people have voted, and state and district results count only people who attested a home ZIP code. How this works.

Email verification is not switched on yet, so no vote counts toward results yet. Votes cast now are saved and count once the voter verifies their email address.

Add a short reason (optional)

/280 · no links or contact details · reasons are reviewed before anyone sees them, and many never are shown.

Your vote is saved but held out of published results by an automated integrity check (for example, several accounts voting from one browser).

Your vote is saved. It will count once you verify your email address. Verify on your account page.

Your vote counts nationally. Add your home ZIP code to count in your state and district too.

Your vote counts nationally and in .

Reason saved privately; it is shown only if it passes review.

A sudden surge of votes on this item was flagged and is under review; votes from new accounts in that surge are held out until it is resolved.

National, state and district results →

Generated by VFA SI Solutions · 2026.08.16 06:00 UTC · ← Back to the Republic