H.R. 10105 explained  ·  119th Congress  ·  Pending in Congress

Stop ICE Price Gouging Act

Create a free account or sign in to follow H.R. 10105 and get alerts. Policy area: Immigration Create a free account or sign in to follow the Immigration policy area and get alerts. ▲ 66 days since action Sponsor: Shri Thanedar, MI-13, D → Congress.gov

Cosponsors: none · per Congress.gov, 2026-10-14

Introduced: 2026-08-13

Latest action (2026-08-14): Referred to the Subcommittee on Border Security and Enforcement.

What H.R. 10105 does, in plain terms

The Congressional Research Service has not published a summary of H.R. 10105 yet. Its official title: “Stop ICE Price Gouging Act”.

Constitution Index

“VFA Constitution grade”

Not graded yet

H.R. 10105 has not been graded yet. New measures with an official summary are graded daily under the published rubric.

The Framers

“Founders’ Verdict”

CONDITIONAL

Confidence 0.75

Archived SI output (machine-generated)

No editorial review recorded. This historical SI verdict was machine-generated by software and predates the review desk; check it against the official bill text.

Synthesis

The bill is constitutional only if it is clearly tied to the federal government's enumerated powers over immigration and federal property, and does not exceed the bounds of necessary and proper means or infringe on state sovereignty or individual contract rights.

Hamilton YES

The proposed bill to cap prices at immigration detention facility commissaries is a constitutional exercise of Congress's enumerated powers. The federal government possesses plenary authority over immigration and the operation of detention facilities under Article I, Section 8, Clause 4 (the power to establish a uniform rule of naturalization) and Clause 18 (the necessary and proper clause). As the Federalist No. 33 explains, the necessary and proper clause grants Congress discretion in selecting means to execute its delegated powers, provided those means are not prohibited and are consistent …

Article I, Section 8, Clause 4 Article I, Section 8, Clause 18 Federalist No. 33
Jefferson NO

The proposed bill to impose a price cap on items sold at immigration detention facility commissaries exceeds the limited and enumerated powers delegated to Congress by the Constitution. Nowhere in Article I, Section 8 is Congress granted the authority to fix prices of goods, even within federal facilities. Such economic regulation intrudes upon the natural right of individuals to freely contract and exchange property, a right secured by the Fifth Amendment's Due Process and Takings Clauses. Moreover, the Tenth Amendment reserves to the states and the people all powers not expressly delegated t…

Amendment X Amendment V Article I, Section 8 Article IV, Section 3, Clause 2
Madison CONDITIONAL

The proposed legislation seeks to regulate prices within immigration detention facilities, which are operated by the federal government. Under the Constitution, Congress possesses the power to regulate commerce among the several states (Article I, Section 8, Clause 3) and to make all laws necessary and proper for executing its enumerated powers (Article I, Section 8, Clause 18). However, the authority to impose price controls on commissary items must be tethered to a specific enumerated power, such as the power to establish uniform rules of naturalization (Article I, Section 8, Clause 4) or to…

Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 Article I, Section 8, Clause 18 Article I, Section 8, Clause 4 Federalist No. 45
Marshall CONDITIONAL

The Constitution vests in Congress the power to regulate commerce among the several states, as affirmed in Gibbons v. Ogden (1824), and to make all laws necessary and proper for executing its enumerated powers, as established in McCulloch v. Maryland (1819). The proposed price cap on commissary items at immigration detention facilities may be a valid exercise of Congress's power to regulate immigration and manage federal property, provided it is a necessary and proper means to carry out the federal government's authority over immigration detention. However, if the cap is applied to items that …

Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 (Commerce Clause) Article I, Section 8, Clause 18 (Necessary and Proper Clause) Tenth Amendment Gibbons v. Ogden (1824) McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) Marbury v. Madison (1803)
Report an error in this Founders' Verdict
No account needed. Or email hello@valuesforamerica.com. How reports are handled.

What should pass

“VFA SI Solution”

Read full document →

Archived SI output (machine-generated) · No editorial review recorded

This historical draft has no editorial review time on record. Check its claims against the original bill and current law.

Immigration Detention Commissary Fair Pricing Act of 2025

Generated by VFA SI Solutions

Prevent price gouging at immigration detention facility commissaries by capping prices on items sold to detainees.

Bipartisan rationale: Democratic priorities: Protects vulnerable detainees from exploitative pricing and ensures basic fairness in federal detention. Republican priorities: Avoids direct price controls, uses market-based pricing tied to local averages, limits federal spending to existing appropriations, and includes a sunset to prevent permanent government overreach.

Funding: Existing DHS appropriations, capped at $2 $2 million per fiscal year (ca Sunset 5y Oversight: DHS Office of Inspector Genera Enforcement: Civil penalties up to $10,000 per vi
→ Article I, Section 8, Clause 4 (naturalization and immigration power) → Article I, Section 8, Clause 17 (power over federal enclaves) → Article I, Section 8, Clause 18 (necessary and proper clause) → Fifth Amendment (due process and takings clause, addressed by using market-based pricing)

Article I, Section 8, Clause 4 Article I, Section 8, Clause 17 Article I, Section 8, Clause 18 Amendment V

Brief for congressional offices →

Report an error in this Solution
No account needed. Or email hello@valuesforamerica.com. How reports are handled.

Citizen Consensus

“Do you support this VFA SI Solution?”

One vote per verified account; you can change it any time. Only verified accounts count, results publish once 30 verified people have voted, and state and district results count only people who attested a home ZIP code. How this works.

Email verification is not switched on yet, so no vote counts toward results yet. Votes cast now are saved and count once the voter verifies their email address.

Add a short reason (optional)

/280 · no links or contact details · reasons are reviewed before anyone sees them, and many never are shown.

Your vote is saved but held out of published results by an automated integrity check (for example, several accounts voting from one browser).

Your vote is saved. It will count once you verify your email address. Verify on your account page.

Your vote counts nationally. Add your home ZIP code to count in your state and district too.

Your vote counts nationally and in .

Reason saved privately; it is shown only if it passes review.

A sudden surge of votes on this item was flagged and is under review; votes from new accounts in that surge are held out until it is resolved.

National, state and district results →

Share card

1200×675 PNG for X, Threads, LinkedIn and messages. Free to share with a link back to this page.

For journalists and bloggers

“Embed this grade”

Free to use with the link back. The badge and card update when the grade changes. Embed terms →

VFA Constitution grade for H.R. 10105

← Back to the Republic