Constitution Index · H.R. 504 · 2025-01-16
Miccosukee Reserved Area Amendments Act
Latest official status (2026-01-08): The Chair directed the Clerk to notify the Senate of the action of the House.
Constitutional grade
A
Constitutional
This bill is fully constitutional. It operates within Congress's enumerated power over Indian affairs, does not infringe any Bill of Rights protections, respects individual sovereignty, properly decentralizes decision-making to the tribal and local level, and involves no deprivation of due process or property rights without just compensation.
Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 Amendment X Amendment V
SI-generated grade · passed automated checks (real Constitution citation, language rules) · not individually reviewed by a person · methodology · Report an error: hello@valuesforamerica.com
The five checks
Enumerated powers · passes
Congress has plenary authority over Indian affairs under Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 (the Indian Commerce Clause). The bill addresses land within an existing Indian reservation and involves consultation with the Miccosukee Tribe, falling squarely within this enumerated power. No federal overreach beyond this authority is present.
Bill of Rights · passes
The bill does not restrict speech, religion, press, assembly, petition, arms, quartering, search and seizure, self-incrimination, due process, takings, fair trial, jury, cruel and unusual punishment, or any other enumerated right. It merely expands a reserved area and directs flood protection measures. No infringement of the First through Tenth Amendments occurs.
Individual liberty · passes
The bill imposes no restriction on any individual's person, property, speech, labor, or belief. It does not command or prohibit any private conduct. The government bears no burden to justify a restriction because none exists. Individual sovereignty is fully preserved.
Decentralization · passes
The bill passes all four decentralization questions. (1) An individual or family could not handle this alone because it involves federal trust land and tribal sovereignty. (2) A local community or county could not handle this because the land is within a national park and involves federal-tribal relations. (3) A state could not handle this because Indian affairs are constitutionally committed to the federal government. (4) The action does not consolidate decision-making upward unnecessarily; it respects tribal consultation and operates within the existing federal framework for Indian lands. The Tenth Amendment is not violated because the subject matter is within federal enumerated power.
Due process and takings · passes
The bill does not deprive any person of life, liberty, or property without due process. It does not take private property for public use without just compensation. The land in question is already within the Everglades National Park and the Miccosukee Reserved Area, so no new taking occurs. The Fifth Amendment's Due Process and Takings Clauses are fully respected.
Provenance
- Congress.gov: HR 504 summary · fetched 2026-10-08 · official page ↗
Version history · never overwritten
| Grade | Graded | Rubric | Source hash | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A · #817 | 2026-10-13 | vfa-constitutional-grade/1.0 | 509cf3b12476 | current |
Cite this
Values for America. “Constitutional grade: H.R. 504, Miccosukee Reserved Area Amendments Act.” VFA Constitution Index, grade 817 (rubric vfa-constitutional-grade/1.0), graded October 13, 2026. https://www.valuesforamerica.com/constitution-index/grades/817. Accessed 2026-10-19.
Permalink: https://www.valuesforamerica.com/constitution-index/grades/817
Data: this grade as JSON · full export. Attribution required.