Constitution Index · H.R. 1840 · 2025-03-04
Closing the De Minimis Loophole Act
Latest official status (2025-03-04): Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Constitutional grade
B
Mostly sound
The bill is a federal exercise of the foreign commerce power, which is explicitly enumerated in Article I, Section 8, Clause 3. It does not infringe on individual rights, as it regulates the importation of goods, not speech, religion, or other protected activities. The primary constitutional concern is the delegation of rulemaking authority to the Treasury Department, which, while broad, is constrained by statutory directives and subject to judicial review. The bill also centralizes trade policy at the federal level, but this is consistent with the Constitution's grant of exclusive authority over foreign commerce. Overall, the bill is mostly sound, with minor due process concerns regarding the rulemaking process.
Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 Article I, Section 8, Clause 1 Amendment X Amendment V
SI-generated grade · passed automated checks (real Constitution citation, language rules) · not individually reviewed by a person · methodology · Report an error: hello@valuesforamerica.com
The five checks
Enumerated powers · passes
The federal government has explicit authority to regulate foreign commerce under Article I, Section 8, Clause 3. This bill directly regulates imports, which is a core component of foreign commerce. The termination of de minimis treatment and the imposition of tariffs, fees, and taxes on imports fall squarely within this enumerated power. The bill also implicates the federal power to lay and collect taxes (Article I, Section 8, Clause 1) and to regulate international postal arrangements, which is an incident of the foreign commerce power.
Bill of Rights · passes
The bill does not implicate any of the first ten amendments. It does not restrict speech, religion, assembly, press, or petition. It does not affect the right to bear arms, quartering of soldiers, search and seizure, self-incrimination, due process, fair trial, jury trial, cruel and unusual punishment, or unenumerated rights. The Tenth Amendment is not violated because the regulation of foreign commerce is expressly delegated to the federal government.
Individual liberty · passes · severity: minor
The bill restricts the ability of individuals to import goods without paying tariffs, but this is a regulation of international trade, not a restriction on personal liberty. The government has a compelling interest in collecting revenue and enforcing trade laws. The burden on individuals is minimal and incidental to the exercise of a legitimate federal power. The bill does not restrict what a person can do with their own person, property, speech, labor, or belief in a way that requires a compelling justification beyond the regulation of commerce.
Decentralization · passes
The four-question test: (1) An individual or family cannot handle the regulation of international trade without government involvement, as tariffs and trade enforcement require a centralized authority. (2) A local community or county cannot handle this, as foreign trade inherently crosses state and national boundaries. (3) A state cannot handle this without federal involvement, as the Constitution grants exclusive authority over foreign commerce to the federal government. (4) The action does not consolidate decision-making at a higher level than necessary; it is the minimum necessary level for regulating foreign commerce. The bill passes all four questions, and it does not violate the Tenth Amendment because the power is expressly delegated to Congress.
Due process and takings · passes · severity: minor
The bill does not take property without just compensation; it imposes tariffs and fees on imports, which are not a taking under the Fifth Amendment. The rulemaking process directed by the bill must comply with the Administrative Procedure Act, which provides notice and comment, ensuring procedural due process. The bill does not bypass due process or the presumption of innocence. The only minor concern is the speed of the rulemaking (120 days), which may be tight but is not inherently unconstitutional.
Provenance
- Congress.gov: HR 1840 summary · fetched 2026-10-09 · official page ↗
Version history · never overwritten
| Grade | Graded | Rubric | Source hash | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| B · #715 | 2026-10-11 | vfa-constitutional-grade/1.0 | bd2f0a234107 | current |
Cite this
Values for America. “Constitutional grade: H.R. 1840, Closing the De Minimis Loophole Act.” VFA Constitution Index, grade 715 (rubric vfa-constitutional-grade/1.0), graded October 11, 2026. https://www.valuesforamerica.com/constitution-index/grades/715. Accessed 2026-10-19.
Permalink: https://www.valuesforamerica.com/constitution-index/grades/715
Data: this grade as JSON · full export. Attribution required.