Constitution Index · H.R. 2715 · 2025-04-08

Destruction of Hazardous Imports Act

Latest official status (2026-07-21): Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.

Official source ↗

Constitutional grade

B

Mostly sound

The bill is a federal exercise of the Commerce Clause power to regulate imports, which is well-established. It raises minor due process concerns because it allows destruction of property without a prior hearing, but it mandates regulations that must provide notice and an opportunity to appear, which mitigates the concern. The bill does not infringe on core Bill of Rights protections, and it appropriately addresses a public health risk at the federal level, given that imports are inherently interstate and international. The main issue is the potential for property deprivation without a full pre-deprivation hearing, but the statutory requirement for due process regulations and the 90-day window for destruction provide a reasonable balance.

Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 Amendment IV Amendment V

SI-generated grade · passed automated checks (real Constitution citation, language rules) · not individually reviewed by a person · methodology · Report an error: hello@valuesforamerica.com

The five checks

Enumerated powers · passes

The federal government has explicit authority to regulate foreign commerce under Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 (the Commerce Clause). This bill regulates imported items that are refused admission, which is a direct exercise of that power. The FDA's authority over imports is a longstanding and accepted federal function.

Bill of Rights · passes · severity: minor

The bill does not implicate the First, Second, Third, Sixth, Seventh, or Eighth Amendments. The Fourth Amendment is not directly implicated because the destruction order is an administrative action, not a search or seizure. The Fifth Amendment's Due Process Clause is relevant, but the bill explicitly requires regulations that provide for notice and an opportunity to appear, which addresses procedural due process. The Takings Clause is not violated because the destruction is a police power action to protect public health, not a taking for public use.

Individual liberty · passes · severity: minor

The bill restricts the owner's ability to export or move refused items, but this is a reasonable exercise of the government's authority to protect public health. The owner retains the right to challenge the destruction order through the required due process procedures. The restriction is not arbitrary and is tied to a compelling public health interest.

Decentralization · passes

The bill concerns imported goods, which are inherently interstate and international. An individual or local community cannot effectively regulate imports, and states cannot unilaterally control the flow of goods across national borders. Federal action is the minimum necessary level of government to address this issue. The bill does not consolidate decision-making upward beyond what is necessary.

Due process and takings · passes · severity: minor

The bill allows the FDA to order destruction of property without a prior hearing, which could be seen as a deprivation of property without due process. However, the bill explicitly requires the FDA to promulgate regulations that provide for notice and an opportunity to appear before destruction. This satisfies procedural due process requirements, as long as the regulations are implemented. The 90-day period for destruction also provides a window for the owner to seek review. The bill does not constitute a taking because it is a valid exercise of the police power to protect public health.

Provenance

Grade ID
661
Rubric version
vfa-constitutional-grade/1.0
Graded
2026-10-11 15:20 UTC
Engine
backup SI engine
Source fetched
2026-10-09 19:07 UTC
Source SHA-256
4ff985b2089b983d8a0fa51bfb539403410d3d3b8eb42e30044d27a70ba132cb
Checks
si-editorial-standard/1.0: real Constitution citation, language rules

Version history · never overwritten

GradeGradedRubric Source hashStatus
B · #661 2026-10-11 vfa-constitutional-grade/1.0 4ff985b2089b current

Cite this

Values for America. “Constitutional grade: H.R. 2715, Destruction of Hazardous Imports Act.” VFA Constitution Index, grade 661 (rubric vfa-constitutional-grade/1.0), graded October 11, 2026. https://www.valuesforamerica.com/constitution-index/grades/661. Accessed 2026-10-20.

Permalink: https://www.valuesforamerica.com/constitution-index/grades/661

Data: this grade as JSON · full export. Attribution required.

← The Constitution Index