Constitution Index · H.R. 1717 · 2025-02-27

Communications Security Act

Latest official status (2025-07-16): Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.

Official source ↗

Constitutional grade

B

Mostly sound

The Communications Security Act is a modest, procedural bill that formalizes an existing FCC advisory council. It does not expand federal regulatory power over communications networks, but rather provides statutory authority for an advisory body that already exists. The bill raises minor concerns regarding the exclusion of foreign-influenced entities from council membership, which could implicate First Amendment associational rights, but these concerns are likely justified by national security interests and are limited to advisory roles. The bill also exempts the council from the two-year termination requirement, which is a minor deviation from standard administrative practice but does not violate the Constitution. Overall, the bill is mostly sound, with minor tensions that are fixable.

Amendment I Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 Article I, Section 8, Clause 18

SI-generated grade · passed automated checks (real Constitution citation, language rules) · not individually reviewed by a person · methodology · Report an error: hello@valuesforamerica.com

The five checks

Enumerated powers · passes

The FCC operates under the Commerce Clause (Article I, Section 8, Clause 3) and the Necessary and Proper Clause (Article I, Section 8, Clause 18) to regulate interstate and foreign communications. Establishing an advisory council to advise on the security, reliability, and interoperability of communications networks falls squarely within the FCC's statutory mandate under the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. The bill does not create new regulatory authority but merely provides statutory authorization for an existing advisory body, which is a legitimate exercise of Congress's power to structure federal agencies.

Bill of Rights · raises concerns · severity: minor

The bill's requirement that council members may not include representatives of entities owned or controlled by, or subject to the influence of, a foreign adversary, or otherwise deemed to pose a threat to U.S. national security, could implicate the First Amendment's freedom of association. However, this restriction applies only to membership on a federal advisory committee, not to general speech or association. The government has a compelling interest in protecting national security, and the restriction is narrowly tailored to exclude only those with foreign adversary ties. The bill does not otherwise infringe on speech, religion, press, assembly, or petition. The exemption from the two-year termination requirement does not implicate any Bill of Rights provision.

Individual liberty · passes

The bill does not restrict what individuals can do with their own person, property, speech, labor, or belief. It only sets membership criteria for a federal advisory committee. The exclusion of foreign-influenced entities from the council is a reasonable qualification for a government advisory role, not a restriction on individual liberty. The bill does not impose any mandates or prohibitions on private conduct.

Decentralization · passes

The bill does not consolidate decision-making at a higher level of government. It merely formalizes an existing FCC advisory council, which is an advisory body, not a regulatory authority. The council includes representatives from federal, state, tribal, and local governments, ensuring input from multiple levels. The bill does not shift power from states to the federal government; it simply provides statutory authority for an existing federal advisory mechanism. The questions: (1) Individuals cannot handle the security and reliability of national communications networks alone; (2) Local communities cannot handle this without state or federal involvement; (3) States cannot handle this without federal involvement because communications networks are interstate and international; (4) The bill does not consolidate decision-making upward; it maintains the status quo.

Due process and takings · passes

The bill does not deprive any person of life, liberty, or property without due process of law. It does not impose penalties or take property. The exclusion of foreign-influenced entities from council membership is not a deprivation of a protected interest; serving on an advisory committee is a privilege, not a right. The bill provides no hearing or notice requirements, but none are required because no individual rights are affected. The bill does not implicate the Takings Clause.

Provenance

Grade ID
492
Rubric version
vfa-constitutional-grade/1.0
Graded
2026-10-10 14:20 UTC
Engine
backup SI engine
Source fetched
2026-10-08 09:43 UTC
Source SHA-256
3c276837dc6061269950d1ec5a9cfa587a9a4a403edac24c0be913b7c20a3143
Checks
si-editorial-standard/1.0: real Constitution citation, language rules

Version history · never overwritten

GradeGradedRubric Source hashStatus
B · #492 2026-10-10 vfa-constitutional-grade/1.0 3c276837dc60 current

Cite this

Values for America. “Constitutional grade: H.R. 1717, Communications Security Act.” VFA Constitution Index, grade 492 (rubric vfa-constitutional-grade/1.0), graded October 10, 2026. https://www.valuesforamerica.com/constitution-index/grades/492. Accessed 2026-10-20.

Permalink: https://www.valuesforamerica.com/constitution-index/grades/492

Data: this grade as JSON · full export. Attribution required.

← The Constitution Index