S. 4786 explained  ·  119th Congress  ·  Pending in Congress

Governors’ Right to Inspect Act of 2026

Create a free account or sign in to follow S. 4786 and get alerts. Policy area: Immigration Create a free account or sign in to follow the Immigration policy area and get alerts. ▲ 127 days since action Sponsor: Cory A. Booker, NJ-Senate, D → Congress.gov

Cosponsors: none · per Congress.gov, 2026-10-14

Introduced: 2026-06-15

Latest action (2026-06-15): Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.

What S. 4786 does, in plain terms

The Congressional Research Service has not published a summary of S. 4786 yet. Its official title: “Governors’ Right to Inspect Act of 2026”.

Constitution Index

“VFA Constitution grade”

Not graded yet

S. 4786 has not been graded yet. New measures with an official summary are graded daily under the published rubric.

The Framers

“Founders’ Verdict”

CONDITIONAL

Confidence 0.75

Archived SI output (machine-generated)

No editorial review recorded. This historical SI verdict was machine-generated by software and predates the review desk; check it against the official bill text.

Synthesis

The bill is constitutional only if it includes explicit safeguards ensuring state inspections do not obstruct or interfere with federal detention operations, personnel, or enforcement discretion, and that they are limited to health and safety oversight with due coordination with federal authorities.

Hamilton CONDITIONAL

The bill purports to authorize state governors to inspect federal immigration detention facilities. While the Tenth Amendment reserves to the states powers not delegated to the United States, the federal government's exclusive authority over immigration and naturalization (Article I, Section 8, Clause 4) and its implied power to manage federal facilities are paramount. The proposed inspection could intrude upon federal executive operations unless carefully circumscribed. The bill would be constitutional only if it explicitly requires coordination with federal authorities, ensures no disruption…

Article I, Section 8, Clause 4 Tenth Amendment Federalist No. 15
Jefferson YES

This bill properly respects the reserved powers of the states under the Tenth Amendment, as health and safety oversight of facilities within a state's borders falls within the police powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution. Additionally, requiring a reporting mechanism to Congress does not exceed federal authority but rather facilitates the sharing of information between the states and the general government, consistent with the principle of federalism. The inspection power vested in the Governor does not interfere with any exclusive federal power over immigration, as the…

Amendment X Article I, Section 8, Clause 18
Madison CONDITIONAL

The bill proposes that state Governors conduct oversight inspections of federal immigration detention facilities. Under the Constitution, the power to regulate immigration and to detain non-citizens is an enumerated power of Congress (Article I, Section 8, Clause 4), and the execution of such laws falls to the Executive. The proposed state role in inspecting federal facilities touches on principles of federalism and the separation of powers. In Federalist No. 45, I argued that the powers delegated to the federal government are limited and enumerated, while the states retain a residuary and inv…

Article I, Section 8, Clause 4 (Naturalization and immigration power) Article VI, Clause 2 (Supremacy Clause) Tenth Amendment (Reserved powers) Federalist No. 45 (Limits of federal power, state sovereignty)
Marshall CONDITIONAL

The Constitution confers upon Congress the power to establish uniform rules of naturalization and to regulate commerce with foreign nations, which includes authority over immigration detention facilities. The proposed bill, by authorizing state Governors to conduct inspections, does not per se conflict with federal supremacy if the inspections are conducted in a manner that does not obstruct or impede the execution of federal law. However, the Necessary and Proper Clause requires that any such state action must not be incompatible with Congress's comprehensive scheme. If the inspections serve …

Article I, Section 8, Clause 4 (Naturalization Power) Article VI, Clause 2 (Supremacy Clause) McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) (implied powers and federal supremacy) Gibbons v. Ogden (1824) (commerce power scope)
Report an error in this Founders' Verdict
No account needed. Or email hello@valuesforamerica.com. How reports are handled.

What should pass

“VFA SI Solution”

Read full document →

Archived SI output (machine-generated) · No editorial review recorded

This historical draft has no editorial review time on record. Check its claims against the original bill and current law.

Inspector General Access and State Notification Act for Immigration Detention Facilities

Generated by VFA SI Solutions

Allow state governors to inspect federal immigration detention facilities in their states for health and safety conditions and require reports to Congress, with the aim of improving oversight and accountability.

Bipartisan rationale: Honors Democratic priorities: transparency, health and safety oversight of detention conditions, state role in protecting human rights. Honors Republican priorities: limited federal preemption, state oversight, modest cost, sunset, and explicit protection of federal enforcement operations from disruption.

Funding: General fund of the Treasury, authorized a $5 million per fiscal year for Sunset 5y Oversight: Inspector General of the Depar Enforcement: If a state conducts an inspection ou
→ Article I, Section 8, Clause 18 (Necessary and Proper Clause) — Congress may establish conditions for federal facility oversight. → Supremacy Clause (Article VI, Clause 2) — state inspections cannot interfere with federal operations. → Tenth Amendment — powers not delegated to the United States are reserved to the states respectively; this bill provides a cooperative state role without commandeering.

Article I, Section 8, Clause 18 Article VI, Clause 2 Amendment X

Brief for congressional offices →

Report an error in this Solution
No account needed. Or email hello@valuesforamerica.com. How reports are handled.

Citizen Consensus

“Do you support this VFA SI Solution?”

One vote per verified account; you can change it any time. Only verified accounts count, results publish once 30 verified people have voted, and state and district results count only people who attested a home ZIP code. How this works.

Email verification is not switched on yet, so no vote counts toward results yet. Votes cast now are saved and count once the voter verifies their email address.

Add a short reason (optional)

/280 · no links or contact details · reasons are reviewed before anyone sees them, and many never are shown.

Your vote is saved but held out of published results by an automated integrity check (for example, several accounts voting from one browser).

Your vote is saved. It will count once you verify your email address. Verify on your account page.

Your vote counts nationally. Add your home ZIP code to count in your state and district too.

Your vote counts nationally and in .

Reason saved privately; it is shown only if it passes review.

A sudden surge of votes on this item was flagged and is under review; votes from new accounts in that surge are held out until it is resolved.

National, state and district results →

Share card

1200×675 PNG for X, Threads, LinkedIn and messages. Free to share with a link back to this page.

For journalists and bloggers

“Embed this grade”

Free to use with the link back. The badge and card update when the grade changes. Embed terms →

VFA Constitution grade for S. 4786

← Back to the Republic