H.R. 9149 explained  ·  119th Congress  ·  Pending in Congress

National Diabetes Project Act

Create a free account or sign in to follow H.R. 9149 and get alerts. Policy area: Health Create a free account or sign in to follow the Health policy area and get alerts. ▲ 137 days since action Sponsor: John James, MI-10, R → Congress.gov

Cosponsors: none · per Congress.gov, 2026-10-08

Introduced: 2026-06-04

Latest action (2026-06-04): Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

What H.R. 9149 does, in plain terms

The Congressional Research Service has not published a summary of H.R. 9149 yet. Its official title: “National Diabetes Project Act”.

Constitution Index

“VFA Constitution grade”

Not graded yet

H.R. 9149 has not been graded yet. New measures with an official summary are graded daily under the published rubric.

The Framers

“Founders’ Verdict”

CONDITIONAL

Confidence 0.50

Archived SI output (machine-generated)

No editorial review recorded. This historical SI verdict was machine-generated by software and predates the review desk; check it against the official bill text.

Synthesis

The Founders are evenly divided: Hamilton and Marshall support constitutionality under the General Welfare and Commerce Clauses, while Madison and Jefferson oppose as exceeding enumerated powers and violating the Tenth Amendment.

Hamilton YES

The proposed legislation to establish the National Diabetes Project falls within the enumerated powers of Congress under Article I, Section 8, Clause 1, which grants Congress the power to 'provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States.' The general welfare clause, as I argued in Federalist No. 30, authorizes appropriations for objects of national benefit, including public health measures that affect the general welfare. Additionally, the commerce power under Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 permits Congress to regulate activities that substantially affect interstate com…

Article I, Section 8, Clause 1 Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 Federalist No. 30
Jefferson NO

The Constitution grants Congress only those powers expressly enumerated in Article I, Section 8. Nowhere does it authorize a general federal project for the prevention or treatment of a specific disease. Such an undertaking falls within the police powers reserved to the several States by the Tenth Amendment. To allow Congress to establish a National Diabetes Project would set a dangerous precedent for federal intrusion into matters of health and welfare that are properly left to the States and the people.

Amendment X Article I, Section 8
Madison NO

The proposed National Diabetes Project lacks a foundation in any enumerated power delegated to the federal government by the Constitution. The powers of Congress are few and defined (Federalist No. 45), and the general welfare clause is not an independent grant of authority but a limitation on the taxing and spending power, which must be exercised in pursuit of the enumerated objects of the Union. A national health project of this nature falls outside the limited sphere of federal jurisdiction and would encroach upon the powers reserved to the states or to the people. The commerce clause canno…

Article I, Section 8 (enumerated powers) Federalist No. 45 (limited federal powers) Federalist No. 10 (danger of faction and overreach)
Marshall YES

This bill, establishing the National Diabetes Project, falls within the enumerated powers of Congress to provide for the general welfare and to regulate commerce among the several states. The Constitution grants Congress the power to lay and collect taxes to pay for the general welfare (Article I, Section 8, Clause 1), and the regulation of commerce includes the power to address matters that substantially affect interstate commerce, such as public health crises that transcend state boundaries. In McCulloch v. Maryland (1819), this Court held that the necessary and proper clause (Article I, Sec…

Article I, Section 8, Clause 1 (General Welfare Clause) Article I, Section 8, Clause 18 (Necessary and Proper Clause) McCulloch v. Maryland (1819)
Report an error in this Founders' Verdict
No account needed. Or email hello@valuesforamerica.com. How reports are handled.

What should pass

“VFA SI Solution”

No solution yet

A sourced SI draft appears here once it passes automated checks (Constitution citation, source verification, independent SI critic). How publication works.

Share card

1200×675 PNG for X, Threads, LinkedIn and messages. Free to share with a link back to this page.

For journalists and bloggers

“Embed this grade”

Free to use with the link back. The badge and card update when the grade changes. Embed terms →

VFA Constitution grade for H.R. 9149

← Back to the Republic