Executive Order 14352 explained · Executive Order · No disposition noted
Saving TikTok While Protecting National Security
Signed: 2025-09-25 Published: 2025-09-30 Federal Register document: 2025-19139
Agencies: Executive Office of the President
Federal Register notes (as of 2026-10-19): Revokes: Memo. of July 24, 2024 See: EO 14166, January 20, 2025; EO 14258, April 4, 2025; EO 14310, June 19, 2025; EO 14350, September 16, 2025
What Executive Order 14352 says
Federal Register, Volume 90 Issue 187 (Tuesday, September 30, 2025) [Federal Register Volume 90, Number 187 (Tuesday, September 30, 2025)] [Presidential Documents] [Pages 47219-47223] From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov] [FR Doc No: 2025-19139] Presidential Documents Federal Register / Vol. 90 , No. 187 / Tuesday, September 30, 2025 / Presidential Documents [[Page 47219]] Executive Order 14352 of September 25, 2025 Saving TikTok While Protecting National Security By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered: Section 1. Background. The Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act (the ``Act'') (Public Law 118-50, Div. H) regulates ``foreign adversary controlled applications,'' specifically those operated by TikTok and any other subsidiary of its China-based parent company, ByteDance Ltd., on national security grounds. Section 2(a) of the Act prohibits entities from distributing, maintaining, or updating certain defined foreign adversary controlled applications within the territory of the United States by providing (1) services for such distribution, maintenance, or updates by means of an online mobile application store or other marketplace; or (2) internet hosting services to enable the distribution, maintenance, or...
Opening of the official text; read it in full in the Federal Register.
Constitution Index
“VFA Constitution grade”
Constitutionally sound
Graded 2026-10-08
SI-generated grade · five published checks · not individually reviewed by a person · methodology
The order executes a law passed by Congress to resolve a foreign control risk through sale to United States control, continued service, and security safeguards, without banning speech, seizing property, or claiming power beyond the statute.
-
✓ Passes · Enumerated powers
The President acts under express statutory authority in Public Law 118-50 Div. H, sections 2(a), 2(c) and 2(g), which directs an interagency determination of qualified divestiture. This rests on Article II, Section 1 vesting of executive power and Article II, Section 3 duty to take care that laws be faithfully executed, and on Congress exercising Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 regulation of foreig… -
✓ Passes · Bill of Rights
The order preserves rather than restricts expression under the First Amendment. It determines that TikTok, Lemon8 and CapCut may continue operating for about 170 million users, creators and businesses after a qualified divestiture, instead of facing prohibition under Public Law 118-50 Div. H. No ban on speech, press, assembly, petition or religion is imposed, no search or seizure under the Fourth … -
✓ Passes · Individual sovereignty
The order expands individual choice by keeping the platforms available for viewing, creating, advertising and earning a livelihood, subject only to ownership, data storage and security monitoring conditions justified by documented foreign adversary control concerns. No person is barred from speaking, worshiping, working, owning property or holding beliefs. The burden test is met because the govern… -
✓ Passes · Decentralization
Control of a foreign adversary application and review of cross-border data flows cannot be handled by an individual, family, county or single state, because no lower level can compel divestiture, audit algorithms, or secure nationwide data storage in a cloud run by an American company. Article II executive power combined with a federal statute addresses an inherently national foreign affairs and i… -
✓ Passes · Due process and takings
No fines, imprisonment, seizure or transfer of property without process occurs. The Fifth Amendment due process and Takings Clause are satisfied because the order follows the procedures set by statute: notice through Executive Orders 14166, 14258, 14310 and 14350, interagency review led by the Vice President with Treasury, Justice, Commerce, National Security Council, Office of Science and Technol…
Report an error in this grade
What should happen instead
“VFA SI Solution”
No Solution yet
A sourced, Constitution-cited alternative appears here once one passes the SI Editorial Standard.
For journalists and bloggers
“Embed this grade”
Free to use with the link back. The badge and card update when the grade changes. Embed terms →