Constitution Index · H.Res. 377 · 2025-05-05

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 276) to rename the Gulf of Mexico as the ‘‘Gulf of America”, and providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 881) to establish Department of Homeland Security funding restrictions on institutions of higher education that have a relationship with Confucius Institutes, and for other purposes.

Latest official status (2025-05-06): Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

Official source ↗

Constitutional grade

B

Mostly sound

This resolution is a procedural rule governing floor consideration of two bills. It does not itself enact substantive policy, but it waives points of order and restricts amendments, which raises minor concerns about legislative process and deliberation. The underlying bills—renaming the Gulf of Mexico and restricting DHS funding to universities with Confucius Institutes—raise more significant constitutional questions, but the resolution itself is largely procedural. The rule's waiver of points of order and limitation on amendments is a standard practice, though it does consolidate power in the majority and limit minority input, which is a minor tension with the principles of representative deliberation. The resolution does not directly infringe on individual rights or exceed federal enumerated powers, but the underlying funding restriction bill could implicate First Amendment and Tenth Amendment concerns if enacted. Overall, the resolution is mostly sound but has minor procedural issues.

Amendment I Amendment X Article I, Section 5, Clause 2

SI-generated grade · passed automated checks (real Constitution citation, language rules) · not individually reviewed by a person · methodology · Report an error: hello@valuesforamerica.com

The five checks

Enumerated powers · passes

The resolution is a procedural rule for the House of Representatives, which is within the explicit authority granted to each house to determine the rules of its proceedings under Article I, Section 5, Clause 2. The resolution does not itself exercise any substantive federal power; it merely sets the terms for debate and amendment on two bills. The underlying bills, if enacted, would need to be assessed separately, but the resolution itself is within Congress's enumerated power to structure its own legislative process.

Bill of Rights · passes · severity: minor

The resolution does not directly infringe on any of the first ten amendments. It is a procedural rule and does not restrict speech, religion, assembly, press, petition, arms, quartering, search and seizure, self-incrimination, due process, takings, trial rights, jury rights, cruel and unusual punishment, unenumerated rights, or reserved powers. However, the underlying bill (H.R. 881) that the resolution facilitates could implicate the First Amendment by conditioning federal funding on the absence of relationships with Confucius Institutes, which may chill academic freedom and association. But that is not a direct effect of this resolution itself.

Individual liberty · passes

The resolution does not restrict individual action directly. It is a procedural rule for the House. The underlying funding restriction bill could affect institutions of higher education and their relationships, but that is not a direct restriction on individual sovereignty. The resolution itself does not burden individuals' person, property, speech, labor, or belief.

Decentralization · passes

This resolution is a procedural matter for the House of Representatives, which is inherently a federal legislative function. It does not consolidate decision-making at a higher level than necessary because it is the House setting its own rules. The underlying bills, however, could raise decentralization concerns: renaming a geographic feature is a federal action that could be handled by states or localities, and the funding restriction on universities could be seen as federal overreach into state-regulated education. But the resolution itself is purely procedural and does not fail the decentralization test.

Due process and takings · passes

The resolution does not bypass due process or take property. It is a procedural rule that waives points of order and limits amendments, which is a standard legislative practice. It does not deprive any person of life, liberty, or property without due process, nor does it take private property for public use without just compensation. The underlying bills could raise due process concerns if they impose funding restrictions without adequate notice or hearing, but that is not a direct effect of this resolution.

Provenance

Grade ID
540
Rubric version
vfa-constitutional-grade/1.0
Graded
2026-10-10 15:20 UTC
Engine
backup SI engine
Source fetched
2026-10-08 09:43 UTC
Source SHA-256
a6f4e8ee2caf6f5f9dae6f4e0496c806289d5b828655f07a5a176675e54916b4
Checks
si-editorial-standard/1.0: real Constitution citation, language rules
  • Official text: HRES 377 (Engrossed in House) · fetched 2026-10-08 · official page ↗

Version history · never overwritten

GradeGradedRubric Source hashStatus
B · #540 2026-10-10 vfa-constitutional-grade/1.0 a6f4e8ee2caf current

Cite this

Values for America. “Constitutional grade: H.Res. 377, Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 276) to rename the Gulf of Mexico as the ‘‘Gulf of America”, and providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 881) to establish Department of Homeland Security funding restrictions on institutions of higher education that have a relationship with Confucius Institutes, and for other purposes..” VFA Constitution Index, grade 540 (rubric vfa-constitutional-grade/1.0), graded October 10, 2026. https://www.valuesforamerica.com/constitution-index/grades/540. Accessed 2026-10-19.

Permalink: https://www.valuesforamerica.com/constitution-index/grades/540

Data: this grade as JSON · full export. Attribution required.

← The Constitution Index