Constitution Index · H.R. 9332 · 2026-06-18

Load Forecasting Enhancement Act

Latest official status (2026-09-16): Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.

Official source ↗

Constitutional grade

C

Significant issues

The Load Forecasting Enhancement Act raises significant constitutional concerns because it uses conditional federal funding and cooperative federalism to pressure states into adopting federal recommendations on electric load forecasting, an area not enumerated in Article I, Section 8. While the bill does not directly commandeer state legislatures, it crosses into Tenth Amendment territory by conditioning state energy conservation funding on adoption of federal forecasting procedures, and by requiring states to 'consider' FERC recommendations under the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act. The bill also fails the decentralization test by consolidating decision-making at the federal level for a matter that states and localities can handle independently.

Article I, Section 8 Amendment X Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 Article I, Section 8, Clause 1 Amendment V

SI-generated grade · passed automated checks (real Constitution citation, language rules) · not individually reviewed by a person · methodology · Report an error: hello@valuesforamerica.com

The five checks

Enumerated powers · raises concerns · severity: significant

The bill's primary mechanism—requiring FERC to establish regional boards to study and recommend electric load forecasting best practices—does not fall within any enumerated power in Article I, Section 8. Electricity generation, distribution, and forecasting are traditionally state and local matters under the Tenth Amendment. While Congress has power over interstate commerce (Commerce Clause, Article I, Section 8, Clause 3), the bill does not regulate interstate commerce in electricity; it mandates federal involvement in forecasting, which is a pre-market planning function. The conditional funding provisions (modifying the Energy Policy and Conservation Act) rely on the Spending Clause (Article I, Section 8, Clause 1), but the conditions are not clearly related to the purpose of the funding (energy conservation plans), raising concerns under South Dakota v. Dole.

Bill of Rights · passes

The bill does not directly infringe any right protected by the first ten amendments. It imposes no restrictions on speech, religion, assembly, press, petition, arms, quartering, search and seizure, self-incrimination, due process, fair trial, jury, cruel and unusual punishment, or unenumerated rights. The requirement for states to 'consider' recommendations does not compel speech or belief.

Individual liberty · passes

The bill does not restrict individual liberty, property, speech, labor, or belief. It imposes obligations on state governments and federal agencies, not on private individuals. No individual is compelled to act or refrain from acting under this bill.

Decentralization · raises concerns · severity: significant

The bill fails three of the four decentralization questions. (1) Individual or family: Electric load forecasting is a technical, grid-level function that individuals cannot handle. (2) Local community or county: Localities can manage forecasting for their own distribution systems, but the bill centralizes this at the regional and federal level. (3) State can handle: States are fully capable of managing electric load forecasting within their borders, as they have done historically. (4) Consolidates upward: Yes—the bill creates federal regional boards chaired by FERC and conditions federal funding on state adoption of federal recommendations, consolidating decision-making at the federal level. This directly violates the Tenth Amendment's reservation of powers to the states.

Due process and takings · passes

The bill does not deprive any person of life, liberty, or property without due process, nor does it take private property for public use without just compensation. It imposes procedural requirements on state agencies, not on individuals. No Fifth Amendment due process or takings issue arises.

Provenance

Grade ID
603
Rubric version
vfa-constitutional-grade/1.0
Graded
2026-10-11 14:20 UTC
Engine
backup SI engine
Source fetched
2026-10-09 19:07 UTC
Source SHA-256
8892770026c6ea633b4e434916a76862c5323fcd8418c1788e10ebe3d1ab37bb
Checks
si-editorial-standard/1.0: real Constitution citation, language rules

Version history · never overwritten

GradeGradedRubric Source hashStatus
C · #603 2026-10-11 vfa-constitutional-grade/1.0 8892770026c6 current

Cite this

Values for America. “Constitutional grade: H.R. 9332, Load Forecasting Enhancement Act.” VFA Constitution Index, grade 603 (rubric vfa-constitutional-grade/1.0), graded October 11, 2026. https://www.valuesforamerica.com/constitution-index/grades/603. Accessed 2026-10-20.

Permalink: https://www.valuesforamerica.com/constitution-index/grades/603

Data: this grade as JSON · full export. Attribution required.

← The Constitution Index