Constitution Index · H.R. 7567 · 2026-02-13
Farm, Food, and National Security Act of 2026
Latest official status (2026-05-19): Received in the Senate.
Constitutional grade
C
Significant issues
Farm bill rests on spending and commerce powers and shows no direct Bill of Rights breach or taking, but its omnibus federal control of largely state and local farm, food, forestry and development matters plus property-use conditions creates significant sovereignty and Tenth Amendment tension requiring narrower, more decentralized drafting.
Amendment X Article I, Section 8, Clause 1 Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 Amendment I Amendment II Amendment IV Amendment V
SI-generated grade · passed automated checks (real Constitution citation, language rules) · not individually reviewed by a person · methodology · Report an error: hello@valuesforamerica.com
The five checks
Enumerated powers · passes · severity: minor
Federal support rests principally on Article I, Section 8, Clause 1, the power to tax and spend for the general welfare, plus Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 on interstate and foreign commerce for commodity, trade, transport and crop insurance provisions. Courts have long sustained farm support and nutrition spending under the spending power. Scope through FY2031 is broad but tied to a listed power, so this check passes with minor tension over reach.
Bill of Rights · passes
No provision described restricts speech, religion, press, assembly under First Amendment, nor arms under Second Amendment, nor authorizes searches under Fourth Amendment. Nutrition, commodity, credit and conservation programs regulate funding and voluntary program terms, not expressive or possessory liberty. Severity is none because no direct Bill of Rights infringement is shown on this summary.
Individual liberty · raises concerns · severity: significant
Under Ninth and Tenth Amendments and liberty protected by Fifth Amendment, core farm bill programs are largely voluntary subsidies and benefits, not bans on person, property, speech, labor or belief. Concern is conditions on subsidies, conservation compliance, and limits on foreign purchase of farm land that burden use and disposition of private property. Government bears burden to show compelling constitutional basis for property-use limits, so this check does not fully pass.
Decentralization · raises concerns · severity: significant
Under Tenth Amendment, many covered topics such as horticulture, forestry management, rural development, research and local food production could be handled by states or local communities. A single federal omnibus through FY2031 consolidates decision-making upward beyond the minimum necessary, even if interstate commodity markets and foreign trade need some federal role. Fails two of four questions.
Due process and takings · passes · severity: minor
Under Fifth Amendment Due Process and Takings Clauses, summary shows reauthorization and modification of benefit, loan, insurance and conservation programs with statutory terms, not seizure of property, fines without hearing, or condemnation without just compensation. Restrictions on foreign investment in farm land would need case-by-case review, but no per se taking without process is established here. Severity is minor as implementation must preserve notice and hearing.
Provenance
- Congress.gov: HR 7567 summary · fetched 2026-10-07 · official page ↗
Version history · never overwritten
| Grade | Graded | Rubric | Source hash | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| C · #311 | 2026-10-08 | vfa-constitutional-grade/1.0 | c03e32167db8 | current |
Cite this
Values for America. “Constitutional grade: H.R. 7567, Farm, Food, and National Security Act of 2026.” VFA Constitution Index, grade 311 (rubric vfa-constitutional-grade/1.0), graded October 8, 2026. https://www.valuesforamerica.com/constitution-index/grades/311. Accessed 2026-10-19.
Permalink: https://www.valuesforamerica.com/constitution-index/grades/311
Data: this grade as JSON · full export. Attribution required.