Constitution Index · H.R. 36 · 2025-01-03
MEGOBARI Act
Latest official status (2025-05-06): Received in the Senate. Read twice. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 70.
Constitutional grade
B
Mostly sound
The MEGOBARI Act is a federal exercise of the foreign affairs and sanctions powers, which are well-established under the Constitution's enumerated powers. It does not directly infringe on the Bill of Rights, as it targets foreign persons and does not restrict domestic speech or assembly. The primary constitutional tension lies in the delegation of broad discretionary authority to the President to determine who is subject to sanctions, which raises due process concerns regarding fair notice and the potential for arbitrary application. However, given the long-standing precedent for such sanctions in foreign affairs, the bill is mostly sound but would benefit from clearer standards and procedural safeguards.
Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 Article II Amendment V Article I, Section 10
SI-generated grade · passed automated checks (real Constitution citation, language rules) · not individually reviewed by a person · methodology · Report an error: hello@valuesforamerica.com
The five checks
Enumerated powers · passes
The federal government has explicit constitutional authority over foreign affairs and international commerce. Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 grants Congress the power to regulate commerce with foreign nations, and the President's foreign affairs powers are inherent in the executive authority under Article II. Sanctions against foreign persons for actions undermining a foreign country's stability are a classic exercise of these powers. The International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) is a valid delegation of authority to the President in the realm of foreign commerce and national security.
Bill of Rights · passes
The bill imposes sanctions on foreign persons, not U.S. citizens or residents. It does not restrict speech, religion, assembly, press, or petition within the United States. The sanctions are targeted at foreign officials and their families, and do not implicate the First, Second, Third, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Seventh, Eighth, Ninth, or Tenth Amendments as applied to U.S. persons. The bill's provisions are consistent with the government's broad authority in foreign affairs, which has been upheld by the Supreme Court (e.g., United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp., 299 U.S. 304 (1936)).
Individual liberty · passes · severity: minor
The bill restricts the property and entry rights of foreign persons, not U.S. citizens. While the Fifth Amendment's Due Process Clause protects 'persons' generally, the Supreme Court has held that foreign nationals without substantial connections to the United States have limited due process rights in the context of immigration and foreign affairs. The sanctions are based on the government's compelling interest in promoting international stability and countering corruption, which justifies the restrictions. The bill does not restrict the sovereignty of U.S. individuals.
Decentralization · passes
This is a matter of foreign affairs, which is inherently a federal responsibility. An individual, local community, or state cannot impose international sanctions or conduct foreign policy. The Constitution explicitly reserves foreign affairs to the federal government (Article I, Section 10 prohibits states from entering into treaties or engaging in foreign policy). The bill does not consolidate decision-making at a higher level than necessary; it is the appropriate level of government for this action.
Due process and takings · raises concerns · severity: significant
The bill grants the President broad discretion to impose sanctions based on vague criteria such as 'undermining Georgia's security or stability' and 'significant acts of corruption.' This raises procedural due process concerns because sanctioned individuals may not receive adequate notice or a meaningful opportunity to contest the designation. However, in the context of foreign affairs, courts have often deferred to the executive's determinations, and the bill does include some congressional oversight and reporting requirements. The Takings Clause is not implicated because the sanctions are not a taking of property for public use; they are a exercise of the foreign affairs power to restrict property of foreign persons. The due process concern is significant but not fatal, given the national security context.
Provenance
- Congress.gov: HR 36 summary · fetched 2026-10-08 · official page ↗
Version history · never overwritten
| Grade | Graded | Rubric | Source hash | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| B · #539 | 2026-10-10 | vfa-constitutional-grade/1.0 | 80b37a01ef85 | current |
Cite this
Values for America. “Constitutional grade: H.R. 36, MEGOBARI Act.” VFA Constitution Index, grade 539 (rubric vfa-constitutional-grade/1.0), graded October 10, 2026. https://www.valuesforamerica.com/constitution-index/grades/539. Accessed 2026-10-19.
Permalink: https://www.valuesforamerica.com/constitution-index/grades/539
Data: this grade as JSON · full export. Attribution required.