Constitution Index · H.R. 277 · 2025-01-09
Matthew Lawrence Perna Act of 2025
Latest official status (2025-01-09): Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Intelligence (Permanent Select), for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Constitutional grade
B
Mostly sound
The bill is largely protective of constitutional rights and limits federal power, but it raises minor concerns regarding the restriction on pretrial detention for certain offenses and the venue change provision, which may implicate procedural due process and the Sixth Amendment's vicinage requirement. Overall, it aligns with the Constitution's structure and protections.
Amendment VI Article I, Section 8, Clause 18 Article I, Section 8, Clause 9 Amendment I Amendment IV Amendment V Amendment VIII
SI-generated grade · passed automated checks (real Constitution citation, language rules) · not individually reviewed by a person · methodology · Report an error: hello@valuesforamerica.com
The five checks
Enumerated powers · passes
Congress has broad authority under Article I, Section 8, Clause 18 (the Necessary and Proper Clause) to enact laws governing the federal judiciary and criminal procedure, as well as to define the jurisdiction of federal courts. The bill's provisions regarding federal criminal prosecutions, investigations, and venue fall within Congress's enumerated powers to constitute tribunals (Article I, Section 8, Clause 9) and to make rules for the government and regulation of the land and naval forces (though not directly applicable here), and more generally to pass laws necessary and proper for carrying into execution the powers vested in the federal government. The bill does not exceed these powers.
Bill of Rights · passes · severity: minor
The bill generally enhances protections under the First Amendment (by protecting political protest), the Fourth Amendment (by limiting surveillance and requiring FOIA disclosure), and the Fifth Amendment (by addressing malicious overprosecution and due process). The prohibition on pretrial detention for political protest offenses that are not crimes of violence does not infringe the Eighth Amendment's prohibition on excessive bail, as it is more protective than the Constitution requires. The venue change provision could implicate the Sixth Amendment's guarantee of trial by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime was committed, but the provision allows a defendant to waive that right and choose a different venue, which is permissible. The bill does not infringe any enumerated rights.
Individual liberty · passes
The bill expands individual sovereignty by protecting individuals from federal overreach in protest-related prosecutions, limiting surveillance, and providing remedies for malicious overprosecution. It does not restrict individual liberty; rather, it places the burden on the government to justify its actions. The provisions align with the principle that individuals have the right to be free from arbitrary government interference.
Decentralization · passes
The bill does not consolidate power at a higher level of government; it actually limits federal power and enhances state and individual autonomy. The venue change provision allows trials to be moved to a district covering the defendant's residence, which may be more local. The bill does not fail any of the four questions: individuals and families are not directly involved, but the bill does not require government action at a higher level than necessary; local communities and states are not preempted; and the bill does not consolidate decision-making upward—it devolves some decision-making to defendants and local courts.
Due process and takings · passes
The bill enhances due process by prohibiting pretrial detention for certain offenses, requiring speedy trials, and providing a cause of action for malicious overprosecution. The venue change provision respects the defendant's choice and does not deprive the government of due process. The bill does not take property without just compensation; it creates a potential liability for the government, which is a due process protection. No procedural or substantive due process concerns are raised.
Provenance
- Congress.gov: HR 277 summary · fetched 2026-10-10 · official page ↗
Version history · never overwritten
| Grade | Graded | Rubric | Source hash | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| B · #793 | 2026-10-13 | vfa-constitutional-grade/1.0 | 68631dfb5150 | current |
Cite this
Values for America. “Constitutional grade: H.R. 277, Matthew Lawrence Perna Act of 2025.” VFA Constitution Index, grade 793 (rubric vfa-constitutional-grade/1.0), graded October 13, 2026. https://www.valuesforamerica.com/constitution-index/grades/793. Accessed 2026-10-20.
Permalink: https://www.valuesforamerica.com/constitution-index/grades/793
Data: this grade as JSON · full export. Attribution required.