Constitution Index · H.R. 1917 · 2025-03-06
Great Lakes Mass Marking Program Act of 2025
Latest official status (2025-07-23): Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Constitutional grade
A
Constitutional
This bill is fully constitutional. It operates within Congress's enumerated powers under the Commerce Clause and Property Clause, does not infringe any Bill of Rights protections, respects individual sovereignty, passes all decentralization tests, and involves no due process or takings issues.
Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 Article IV, Section 3, Clause 2 Amendment X Amendment V
SI-generated grade · passed automated checks (real Constitution citation, language rules) · not individually reviewed by a person · methodology · Report an error: hello@valuesforamerica.com
The five checks
Enumerated powers · passes
Congress has authority under Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 (Commerce Clause) to regulate fisheries that affect interstate commerce, and under Article IV, Section 3, Clause 2 (Property Clause) to manage federal property and resources. The Great Lakes are a body of water spanning multiple states and the U.S.-Canada border, and their fisheries directly affect interstate and international commerce. The bill merely provides statutory authority for an existing FWS program, staying well within these enumerated powers.
Bill of Rights · passes
The bill involves tagging hatchery fish and sharing data with government agencies. It does not restrict speech, religion, assembly, press, petition, arms, quartering, search and seizure, self-incrimination, due process, takings, trial rights, jury rights, cruel and unusual punishment, or any other right protected by the first ten amendments. No individual's rights are implicated.
Individual liberty · passes
The bill regulates hatchery-produced fish stocked in the Great Lakes by the federal government itself. It does not restrict what any individual may do with their own person, property, speech, labor, or belief. There is no mandate, prohibition, or penalty imposed on private citizens. The burden of justification is not triggered because no individual freedom is restricted.
Decentralization · passes
The bill passes all four questions. (1) Individuals and families cannot manage interstate Great Lakes fisheries on their own; this requires coordinated management across multiple states and tribal nations. (2) Local communities and counties cannot manage a resource spanning eight states and an international border. (3) No single state can manage the Great Lakes fishery effectively because fish migrate across state lines and the U.S.-Canada border. (4) The bill does not consolidate decision-making upward beyond the minimum necessary; it supports existing cooperative federalism by making data available to state and tribal agencies, which retain primary management authority. The Tenth Amendment is respected because the bill does not commandeer state resources or preempt state law.
Due process and takings · passes
The bill imposes no penalties, deprivations, or property takings. It authorizes the federal government to tag its own hatchery fish and share data. No individual is subject to any government action that would require notice, hearing, or just compensation. The Fifth Amendment's Due Process and Takings Clauses are not implicated.
Provenance
- Congress.gov: HR 1917 summary · fetched 2026-10-08 · official page ↗
Version history · never overwritten
| Grade | Graded | Rubric | Source hash | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A · #486 | 2026-10-10 | vfa-constitutional-grade/1.0 | 9cee3aa9d0d1 | current |
Cite this
Values for America. “Constitutional grade: H.R. 1917, Great Lakes Mass Marking Program Act of 2025.” VFA Constitution Index, grade 486 (rubric vfa-constitutional-grade/1.0), graded October 10, 2026. https://www.valuesforamerica.com/constitution-index/grades/486. Accessed 2026-10-19.
Permalink: https://www.valuesforamerica.com/constitution-index/grades/486
Data: this grade as JSON · full export. Attribution required.