Constitution Index · H.R. 1272 · 2025-02-12
Secure Storage Information Act of 2025
Latest official status (2025-02-12): Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Constitutional grade
B
Mostly sound
The Secure Storage Information Act of 2025 is a federal bill that imposes new requirements on federal firearm licensees (FFLs) and creates a tax credit for gun safes. The bill's provisions are largely within Congress's enumerated powers under the Commerce Clause and its taxing power. The requirements on FFLs are conditions on commercial activity and do not directly restrict individual rights. The tax credit is a permissible exercise of the spending power. However, the bill's mandate that FFLs make available a 'variety' of storage devices may impose an undue burden on small businesses, and the information requirements, while not infringing on the Second Amendment, could be seen as a minor federal overreach into areas traditionally regulated by states. The bill does not violate the Bill of Rights, and it does not take property without due process. The decentralization check is mixed: while the tax credit is a federal incentive, the storage requirements could be handled at the state level, but the federal interest in interstate firearms commerce justifies some federal role. Overall, the bill is mostly sound but has minor federalism and burden concerns.
Amendment II Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 Article I, Section 8, Clause 1 Amendment X
SI-generated grade · passed automated checks (real Constitution citation, language rules) · not individually reviewed by a person · methodology · Report an error: hello@valuesforamerica.com
The five checks
Enumerated powers · passes
Congress has authority under Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 (Commerce Clause) to regulate the sale of firearms, which are items in interstate commerce. The bill's requirements on FFLs are conditions on their commercial activity. The tax credit is authorized under Article I, Section 8, Clause 1 (Taxing and Spending Clause) as a spending measure to promote public safety. The bill does not exceed these enumerated powers.
Bill of Rights · passes
The bill does not infringe on the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms. It does not prohibit the sale or possession of firearms; it only requires information and availability of storage devices. The First, Third, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Seventh, Eighth, Ninth, and Tenth Amendments are not implicated. The Tenth Amendment is not violated because the bill regulates interstate commerce and uses federal spending, which are federal powers.
Individual liberty · passes
The bill does not restrict an individual's ability to own, possess, or use firearms. It imposes obligations on FFLs, not on individuals. The tax credit is an incentive, not a restriction. Individuals retain full sovereignty over their property and choices regarding firearm storage. The burden is on the government to justify any restriction, and here there is no restriction on individual action.
Decentralization · raises concerns · severity: minor
The bill fails the decentralization test because it consolidates decision-making at the federal level for matters that could be handled by states or localities. While the Commerce Clause justifies federal regulation of interstate firearms sales, the specific requirements on FFLs (e.g., variety of devices) and the tax credit could be implemented at the state level. The federal government is not the minimum necessary level of government for these policies. However, the tax credit is a federal spending measure, which is a legitimate federal role. The bill fails two questions: local communities and states could handle these requirements without federal involvement, and the bill consolidates upward.
Due process and takings · passes
The bill does not deprive any person of life, liberty, or property without due process. It does not take private property for public use without just compensation. The requirements on FFLs are conditions on their license to sell firearms, which is a regulated activity. The tax credit is a benefit, not a taking. There is no procedural or substantive due process violation.
Provenance
- Congress.gov: HR 1272 summary · fetched 2026-10-10 · official page ↗
Version history · never overwritten
| Grade | Graded | Rubric | Source hash | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| B · #755 | 2026-10-13 | vfa-constitutional-grade/1.0 | b88cebc7f2af | current |
Cite this
Values for America. “Constitutional grade: H.R. 1272, Secure Storage Information Act of 2025.” VFA Constitution Index, grade 755 (rubric vfa-constitutional-grade/1.0), graded October 13, 2026. https://www.valuesforamerica.com/constitution-index/grades/755. Accessed 2026-10-19.
Permalink: https://www.valuesforamerica.com/constitution-index/grades/755
Data: this grade as JSON · full export. Attribution required.