Constitution Index · H.R. 10254 · 2026-09-03
MORE Savings Act
Latest official status (2026-09-03): Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on Ways and Means, and Education and Workforce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Constitutional grade
B
Mostly sound
The MORE Savings Act is mostly sound but has minor constitutional tensions. It operates within federal enumerated powers under the Spending Clause and Commerce Clause, does not infringe core Bill of Rights protections, and respects individual sovereignty by expanding access to treatment without coercion. However, it fails the decentralization test by imposing uniform federal mandates on private health insurers and state Medicaid programs, consolidating decision-making upward beyond the minimum necessary. The due process and takings concerns are minimal.
Article I, Section 8, Clause 1 Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 Amendment V
SI-generated grade · passed automated checks (real Constitution citation, language rules) · not individually reviewed by a person · methodology · Report an error: hello@valuesforamerica.com
The five checks
Enumerated powers · passes
The bill operates under Congress's spending power (Article I, Section 8, Clause 1) to condition Medicare and Medicaid funding, and under the Commerce Clause (Article I, Section 8, Clause 3) to regulate private health insurance markets. These are well-established constitutional authorities for health policy.
Bill of Rights · passes
The bill does not restrict speech, religion, assembly, press, petition, arms, quartering, search and seizure, self-incrimination, due process, fair trial, jury, cruel and unusual punishment, or unenumerated rights. It imposes no criminal penalties or searches. No Bill of Rights provision is implicated.
Individual liberty · passes
The bill expands access to opioid treatment and recovery services without mandating any individual to undergo treatment or accept services. It does not restrict personal liberty, property, speech, labor, or belief. The government bears no burden to justify a restriction because none exists.
Decentralization · raises concerns · severity: minor
The bill fails the decentralization test because it imposes uniform federal requirements on private health insurers and state Medicaid programs, consolidating decision-making at the federal level. Individuals and families cannot handle opioid treatment coverage without insurance; states could handle this without federal mandates; and the federal government mandates specific coverage terms rather than allowing state or local variation.
Due process and takings · passes
The bill does not deprive any person of life, liberty, or property without due process. It does not impose fines, forfeitures, or criminal penalties. The requirement for insurers to cover services without cost-sharing is a regulatory condition on participation in interstate commerce, not a taking of property requiring just compensation under the Fifth Amendment.
Provenance
- Congress.gov: HR 10254 summary · fetched 2026-10-14 · official page ↗
Version history · never overwritten
| Grade | Graded | Rubric | Source hash | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| B · #930 | 2026-10-14 | vfa-constitutional-grade/1.0 | deffe1355969 | current |
Cite this
Values for America. “Constitutional grade: H.R. 10254, MORE Savings Act.” VFA Constitution Index, grade 930 (rubric vfa-constitutional-grade/1.0), graded October 14, 2026. https://www.valuesforamerica.com/constitution-index/grades/930. Accessed 2026-10-19.
Permalink: https://www.valuesforamerica.com/constitution-index/grades/930
Data: this grade as JSON · full export. Attribution required.