S.Res. 377 explained  ·  119th Congress  ·  Agreed to in the Senate

An executive resolution authorizing the en bloc consideration in Executive Session of certain nominations on the Executive Calendar.

Create a free account or sign in to follow S.Res. 377 and get alerts. Policy area: Congress Create a free account or sign in to follow the Congress policy area and get alerts. ▲ 400 days since action Sponsor: John Thune, SD-Senate, R → Congress.gov

Cosponsors: none · per Congress.gov, 2026-10-10

Introduced: 2025-09-08

Latest action (2025-09-15): Resolution agreed to in Senate without amendment by Yea-Nay Vote. 51 - 44. Record Vote Number: 517.

What S.Res. 377 does, in plain terms

This resolution provides for the en bloc consideration in Executive Session of nominations for various executive officers and ambassadors. The agencies in which the executive officers shall serve include the Departments of Defense, Energy, the Interior, and Labor. The ambassadors shall represent the United States to Argentina, Greece, Liechtenstein, and Sweden.

Official summary by the Congressional Research Service, via Congress.gov.

Constitution Index

“VFA Constitution grade”

A

Constitutionally sound

Graded 2026-10-08

SI-generated grade · five published checks · not individually reviewed by a person · methodology

SRES 377 is a routine internal Senate procedural rule organizing en bloc consideration of executive and ambassador nominations. It rests squarely on Article II advice-and-consent authority and the Article I power of the Senate to set its own proceedings, with no rights infringement, sovereignty restriction, or federalism concern.

  • ✓ Passes · Enumerated powers
    The Senate has explicit authority to act. Article II, Section 2, Clause 2 grants the Senate advice-and-consent power over officers and ambassadors, and Article I, Section 5, Clause 2 authorizes each House to determine the Rules of its Proceedings. An en bloc consideration rule is a direct exercise of that rulemaking power.
  • ✓ Passes · Bill of Rights
    No speech, religion, press, arms, search, trial, or other Bill of Rights interest is implicated. The resolution governs only Senate floor procedure for nominations and restricts no private conduct protected by the First through Tenth Amendments.
  • ✓ Passes · Individual sovereignty
    The resolution restricts no personal decision over body, property, speech, labor, or belief. It binds only Senators in Executive Session procedure. No private liberty requires government justification here because none is infringed.
  • ✓ Passes · Decentralization
    Advice and consent is an inherently federal Senate function that cannot be performed by individuals, localities, or states. The resolution does not transfer any decision-making from a lower to a higher level; it only organizes the Senate's own constitutionally assigned work, so no upward consolidation occurs.
  • ✓ Passes · Due process and takings
    No person is deprived of life, liberty, or property and no property is taken. The Fifth Amendment Due Process and Takings Clauses apply to deprivations against private persons, not to Senate scheduling of nomination votes. Nominees have no vested property right in confirmation.

Sources: Congress.gov: SRES 377 summary

Report an error in this grade
No account needed. Or email hello@valuesforamerica.com. How reports are handled.

What should pass

“VFA SI Solution”

No solution yet

A sourced SI draft appears here once it passes automated checks (Constitution citation, source verification, independent SI critic). How publication works.

Share card

1200×675 PNG for X, Threads, LinkedIn and messages. Free to share with a link back to this page.

For journalists and bloggers

“Embed this grade”

Free to use with the link back. The badge and card update when the grade changes. Embed terms →

VFA Constitution grade for S.Res. 377

← Back to the Republic