S. 996 explained  ·  119th Congress  ·  Pending in Congress

Preserving Choice in Vehicle Purchases Act of 2025

Create a free account or sign in to follow S. 996 and get alerts. Policy area: Environmental Protection Create a free account or sign in to follow the Environmental Protection policy area and get alerts. ▲ 586 days since action Sponsor: Markwayne Mullin, OK-Senate, R → Congress.gov

Cosponsors: 20 (0 D, 20 R) · per Congress.gov, 2026-10-12

Introduced: 2025-03-12

Latest action (2025-03-12): Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.

What S. 996 does, in plain terms

Preserving Choice in Vehicle Purchases Act of 2025 This bill modifies the waiver process under the Clean Air Act related to state emission control standards for new motor vehicles (or new motor vehicle engines). Under current law, states are preempted from adopting or enforcing emission control standards for new motor vehicles (or new motor vehicle engines) unless the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) provides a waiver authorizing a state to adopt such standards if certain requirements are met. The bill provides that state standards that directly or indirectly limit the sale or use of new motor vehicles with internal combustion engines are not eligible for waivers. The bill also prohibits the EPA from determining that any state standards amended after the bill's enactment are within the scope of an existing waiver. Additionally, the bill requires the EPA to revoke waivers granted between January 1, 2022, and the date of enactment of this bill if the standards directly or indirectly limit the sale or use of new motor vehicles with internal combustion engines.

Official summary by the Congressional Research Service, via Congress.gov.

Constitution Index

“VFA Constitution grade”

C

Significant constitutional concerns

Graded 2026-10-11

SI-generated grade · five published checks · not individually reviewed by a person · methodology

The bill raises significant federalism concerns by restricting state authority to set stricter emission standards, potentially undermining the cooperative federalism framework of the Clean Air Act. While it may be within Congress's commerce power, it consolidates decision-making at the federal level and restricts state experimentation, which is a core value of the Tenth Amendment. The bill does not directly infringe individual rights, but it limits state sovereignty in a way that requires careful constitutional scrutiny.

  • ✓ Passes · Enumerated powers
    Congress has authority under the Commerce Clause (Article I, Section 8, Clause 3) to regulate interstate commerce, which includes motor vehicle emissions that cross state lines. The Clean Air Act's waiver process is a valid exercise of this power, and amending it falls within Congress's enumerated powers.
  • ✓ Passes · Bill of Rights
    The bill does not implicate the First, Second, Third, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Seventh, Eighth, or Ninth Amendments. It concerns state regulatory authority over vehicle emissions, not individual rights protected by the Bill of Rights.
  • ✓ Passes · Individual sovereignty
    The bill does not restrict individual liberties directly. It affects state regulatory powers and the availability of certain vehicle types, but it does not infringe on personal autonomy, property rights, or freedom of contract in a manner that violates the Constitution.
  • ✗ Concern · Decentralization
    The bill fails the decentralization test because it consolidates decision-making at the federal level by limiting state authority to set stricter emission standards. While states could still regulate under federal guidelines, the bill preempts state choices that directly or indirectly limit internal combustion engine vehicles, thereby reducing state autonomy and experimentation. This is a signific…
  • ✓ Passes · Due process and takings
    The bill does not deprive any person of life, liberty, or property without due process. It does not involve takings of private property. The revocation of waivers is an administrative action that does not implicate the Takings Clause or procedural due process concerns.

Sources: Congress.gov: S 996 summary

Report an error in this grade
No account needed. Or email hello@valuesforamerica.com. How reports are handled.

What should pass

“VFA SI Solution”

No solution yet

A sourced SI draft appears here once it passes automated checks (Constitution citation, source verification, independent SI critic). How publication works.

Share card

1200×675 PNG for X, Threads, LinkedIn and messages. Free to share with a link back to this page.

For journalists and bloggers

“Embed this grade”

Free to use with the link back. The badge and card update when the grade changes. Embed terms →

VFA Constitution grade for S. 996

← Back to the Republic