Real bill currently in Congress c/o S/119/5381
ADVERSARIES Act
Latest action (2026-08-07): Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
The Framers
“Founders’ Verdict”
Confidence 0.75
Synthesis
The bill is constitutional only if it is narrowly tailored to foreign commerce and national security, avoids infringing on state police powers or individual rights (especially Fourth Amendment protections), and includes clear legislative standards to prevent excessive delegation of authority to the executive branch.
This bill is a proper exercise of the legislative power vested in Congress by the Constitution. The requirement to analyze threats from foreign adversary access to controlled items falls squarely within Congress's authority to regulate commerce with foreign nations under Article I, Section 8, Clause 3, and to provide for the common defense, as further enabled by the Necessary and Proper Clause (Article I, Section 8, Clause 18). Such an analysis is a necessary preliminary to the enactment of future regulations or restrictions consistent with the national interest. The Federalist No. 23 undersco…
This bill, requiring analysis of threats from foreign adversary access to controlled items, touches upon the federal power to regulate commerce and provide for the common defense. However, the Constitution grants Congress enumerated powers only, and the Tenth Amendment reserves all other powers to the states or the people. The bill may be constitutional if it is strictly limited to regulating foreign commerce and national security under Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 (Commerce Clause) and Clause 1 (General Welfare and Common Defense). Yet, if it extends to items or activities not clearly withi…
The bill's requirement for an analysis of threats posed by foreign adversary access to controlled items falls within the federal power to regulate commerce with foreign nations and to provide for the common defense, as enumerated in Article I, Section 8. However, the Constitution strictly limits federal authority to powers expressly delegated, and any such analysis must not exceed the necessary and proper means to secure these ends. The bill must avoid infringing upon state police powers or the rights of the people under the Fourth Amendment, as the collection of information about 'controlled …
This bill, requiring an analysis of threats posed by foreign adversary access to controlled items, is a proper exercise of Congress's power to regulate commerce with foreign nations and to provide for the common defense. The analysis is a necessary and proper means to effectuate these enumerated powers, as it directly relates to controlling items that may enter or affect interstate and foreign commerce. The Constitution does not forbid such a measure, and it aligns with the principles of implied powers recognized in McCulloch v. Maryland and the broad definition of commerce in Gibbons v. Ogden…
What should pass
“AI Consensus Solution”
No solution yet
Daily synthesis runs at 06:00 UTC. This bill's consensus draft will appear on the next pass.