S. 5376 explained · 119th Congress · Pending in Congress
FITNESS Act
Cosponsors: 1 (1 D, 0 R) · per Congress.gov, 2026-10-14
Introduced: 2026-08-07
Latest action (2026-08-07): Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
What S. 5376 does, in plain terms
The Congressional Research Service has not published a summary of S. 5376 yet. Its official title: “FITNESS Act”.
Constitution Index
“VFA Constitution grade”
Not graded yet
S. 5376 has not been graded yet. New measures with an official summary are graded daily under the published rubric.
The Framers
“Founders’ Verdict”
Confidence 0.90
Archived SI output (machine-generated)No editorial review recorded. This historical SI verdict was machine-generated by software and predates the review desk; check it against the official bill text.
Synthesis
The bill is constitutional as an exercise of Congress's power under the Necessary and Proper Clause and the Appointments Clause to set minimum standards for federal law enforcement officers, ensuring faithful execution of the laws without infringing on executive appointment powers or state reserved rights, provided it applies solely to federal officers.
This bill is a constitutional exercise of Congress's power to establish qualifications for federal officers and to regulate the executive branch's law enforcement functions. The Constitution grants Congress authority to make all laws necessary and proper for carrying into execution the powers vested in the federal government (Article I, Section 8, Clause 18). Furthermore, the Appointments Clause (Article II, Section 2, Clause 2) empowers Congress to vest the appointment of inferior officers in the President, courts, or department heads, and it is consistent with that clause for Congress to pre…
The federal government possesses the authority to prescribe rules for its own officers under the Necessary and Proper Clause, as such regulations are incident to the execution of its enumerated powers. However, this power must be strictly confined to federal officers and must not encroach upon the rights reserved to the states or the people. The Tenth Amendment stands as a bulwark against any expansion of federal authority beyond that which is expressly delegated. Therefore, this bill is constitutional only insofar as it applies solely to federal law enforcement and does not impose standards u…
The Constitution vests in Congress the authority to make all laws necessary and proper for carrying into execution the powers of the federal government. Establishing minimum standards for Federal law enforcement officers is a legitimate means of ensuring the faithful execution of the laws, which is a duty of the executive branch under Article II. Such legislation does not exceed the enumerated powers of Congress, as it pertains solely to the regulation of federal officers and does not intrude upon the reserved powers of the states. The power to set qualifications and standards for federal offi…
This bill is constitutional as it falls within the enumerated powers of Congress to regulate the conduct of federal officers and to ensure the proper execution of federal laws. The Constitution grants Congress the authority to make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the powers vested in the government of the United States (Article I, Section 8, Clause 18). Establishing minimum standards for federal law enforcement officers is a necessary and proper means to ensure the faithful execution of the laws, as it directly relates to the efficiency and integrity of…
Report an error in this Founders' Verdict
What should pass
“VFA SI Solution”
No solution yet
A sourced SI draft appears here once it passes automated checks (Constitution citation, source verification, independent SI critic). How publication works.
For journalists and bloggers
“Embed this grade”
Free to use with the link back. The badge and card update when the grade changes. Embed terms →
