S. 5235 explained  ·  119th Congress  ·  Pending in Congress

Alan Reinstein Ban Asbestos Now Act of 2026

Create a free account or sign in to follow S. 5235 and get alerts. Policy area: Environmental Protection Create a free account or sign in to follow the Environmental Protection policy area and get alerts. ▲ 77 days since action Sponsor: Jeff Merkley, OR-Senate, D → Congress.gov

Cosponsors: 1 (0 D, 1 R) · per Congress.gov, 2026-10-14

Introduced: 2026-08-04

Latest action (2026-08-04): Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.

What S. 5235 does, in plain terms

The Congressional Research Service has not published a summary of S. 5235 yet. Its official title: “Alan Reinstein Ban Asbestos Now Act of 2026”.

Constitution Index

“VFA Constitution grade”

Not graded yet

S. 5235 has not been graded yet. New measures with an official summary are graded daily under the published rubric.

The Framers

“Founders’ Verdict”

CONDITIONAL

Confidence 0.75

Archived SI output (machine-generated)

No editorial review recorded. This historical SI verdict was machine-generated by software and predates the review desk; check it against the official bill text.

Synthesis

The bill is constitutional only if strictly confined to activities that substantially affect interstate commerce, avoiding regulation of purely intrastate use or encroachment on state police powers under the Tenth Amendment.

Hamilton YES

The proposed bill falls squarely within the enumerated power of Congress to regulate interstate commerce under Article I, Section 8, Clause 3. The manufacture, processing, use, and distribution of commercial asbestos are activities that substantially affect interstate commerce, as asbestos is a commodity traded across state lines. The Toxic Substances Control Act itself is a valid exercise of this commerce power, and this amendment merely refines the regulation to address a specific public health hazard. The Necessary and Proper Clause (Article I, Section 8, Clause 18) further authorizes Congr…

Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 Article I, Section 8, Clause 18 Federalist No. 33
Jefferson CONDITIONAL

The federal authority to regulate commerce is limited to that which is truly interstate in nature. A complete prohibition on the manufacture, processing, use, and distribution of commercial asbestos may exceed this delegated power, particularly as it pertains to purely intrastate activities and the reserved police powers of the states. Congress may lawfully regulate the interstate distribution of a hazardous substance, but to ban all use—even within a single state—would encroach upon the liberties of the people and the sovereignty of the states, unless the activity is demonstrated to have a su…

Amendment X Article I, Section 8, Clause 3
Madison YES

This bill falls within the enumerated power of Congress to regulate commerce among the several states. The manufacture, processing, and distribution of commercial asbestos are activities that substantially affect interstate commerce, and Congress may prohibit such commerce to protect the public health and welfare. The Tenth Amendment reserves to the states powers not delegated, but the regulation of hazardous substances in interstate commerce is a proper federal function, as it addresses a national concern that no single state can effectively control. Federalist No. 45 reminds us that the fede…

Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 Tenth Amendment Federalist No. 45 Federalist No. 10
Marshall YES

This bill falls within the enumerated power of Congress to regulate interstate commerce, as established in Gibbons v. Ogden. The manufacture, processing, use, and distribution of commercial asbestos are activities that substantially affect interstate commerce, and Congress may prohibit such commerce to protect the public health and welfare. The Necessary and Proper Clause (Article I, Section 8, Clause 18) authorizes Congress to enact laws that are appropriate and plainly adapted to a legitimate end, such as the regulation of hazardous substances. The Toxic Substances Control Act is a valid exe…

Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 (Commerce Clause) Article I, Section 8, Clause 18 (Necessary and Proper Clause) Gibbons v. Ogden (1824)
Report an error in this Founders' Verdict
No account needed. Or email hello@valuesforamerica.com. How reports are handled.

What should pass

“VFA SI Solution”

No solution yet

A sourced SI draft appears here once it passes automated checks (Constitution citation, source verification, independent SI critic). How publication works.

Share card

1200×675 PNG for X, Threads, LinkedIn and messages. Free to share with a link back to this page.

For journalists and bloggers

“Embed this grade”

Free to use with the link back. The badge and card update when the grade changes. Embed terms →

VFA Constitution grade for S. 5235

← Back to the Republic