S. 5198 explained · 119th Congress · Pending in Congress
Build to Scale Reauthorization Act of 2026
Cosponsors: 1 (1 D, 0 R) · per Congress.gov, 2026-10-14
Introduced: 2026-07-30
Latest action (2026-07-30): Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
What S. 5198 does, in plain terms
The Congressional Research Service has not published a summary of S. 5198 yet. Its official title: “Build to Scale Reauthorization Act of 2026”.
Constitution Index
“VFA Constitution grade”
Not graded yet
S. 5198 has not been graded yet. New measures with an official summary are graded daily under the published rubric.
The Framers
“Founders’ Verdict”
Confidence 0.60
Archived SI output (machine-generated)No editorial review recorded. This historical SI verdict was machine-generated by software and predates the review desk; check it against the official bill text.
Synthesis
The bill is constitutional under the Commerce Clause (Article I, Section 8, Clause 3), the Patent and Copyright Clause (Article I, Section 8, Clause 8), and the Necessary and Proper Clause (Article I, Section 8, Clause 18), as it promotes the progress of science and regulates interstate commerce. Congress has broad discretion to choose means to execute its enumerated powers, and the reauthorization of a regional innovation program is a proper exercise of that discretion, provided it remains tied to these constitutional foundations and does not infringe on state powers reserved by the Tenth Amendment.
This bill reauthorizes a regional innovation program under the Stevenson-Wydler Technology Innovation Act, which falls within Congress's power to promote the progress of science and useful arts, as well as to regulate interstate commerce. The Constitution grants Congress authority to provide for the general welfare and to make all laws necessary and proper for executing its enumerated powers. Federalist No. 23 argues that the federal government must possess powers commensurate with the objects of national concern, and promoting technological innovation is a matter of national economic interest…
The reauthorization of a regional innovation program extends federal authority into matters not enumerated in the Constitution. The promotion of technology and innovation, while commendable, is not a power delegated to the general government. The states themselves, as sovereign entities, are better suited to foster such local enterprises. To allow Congress to assume this role would be to expand its powers beyond the limited list provided in Article I, Section 8, thereby infringing upon the rights of the states and the people.
The Constitution vests in Congress the power to promote the progress of science and useful arts, as per Article I, Section 8, Clause 8, which grants authority over patents and copyrights. However, the general welfare clause (Article I, Section 8, Clause 1) must be strictly construed to mean only those powers specifically enumerated, not a general license to legislate for any purpose. A regional innovation program, if it involves direct federal funding or regulation of commerce among the states, may be permissible under the commerce power (Article I, Section 8, Clause 3) only if it regulates in…
This bill, which reauthorizes a regional innovation program, falls within the enumerated powers of Congress under Article I, Section 8, Clause 3, which grants Congress the power to regulate commerce among the several states, and under Clause 8, which empowers Congress to promote the progress of science and useful arts. The program, by fostering innovation and technology transfer, directly supports these constitutional objectives. Moreover, as established in McCulloch v. Maryland (1819), Congress possesses broad discretion in selecting the means to execute its enumerated powers, and the Necessa…
Report an error in this Founders' Verdict
What should pass
“VFA SI Solution”
Archived SI output (machine-generated) · No editorial review recorded
This historical draft has no editorial review time on record. Check its claims against the original bill and current law.
Regional Innovation Reauthorization with Performance-Based Safeguards Act of 2025
Generated by VFA SI Solutions
To continue federal support for regional technology-based innovation clusters by reauthorizing the regional innovation program under the Stevenson-Wydler Technology Innovation Act, helping local research hubs create jobs and spur economic growth.
Bipartisan rationale: Honors Democratic priorities by maintaining robust federal investment in regional innovation ecosystems, particularly in underserved areas, and supporting workforce development through university-community partnerships. Honors Republican priorities by imposing a strict 5-year sunset, mandatory performance metrics, a 25% non-federal match requirement, and a full offset through administrative spending reductions, ensuring fiscal restraint and limited federal footprint.
Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 Article I, Section 8, Clause 8 Article I, Section 8, Clause 18 Amendment X
Report an error in this Solution
Citizen Consensus
“Do you support this VFA SI Solution?”
One vote per verified account; you can change it any time. Only verified accounts count, results publish once 30 verified people have voted, and state and district results count only people who attested a home ZIP code. How this works.
Email verification is not switched on yet, so no vote counts toward results yet. Votes cast now are saved and count once the voter verifies their email address.
Sign in or create a free account to vote.
Add a short reason (optional)
/280 · no links or contact details · reasons are reviewed before anyone sees them, and many never are shown.
Your vote is saved but held out of published results by an automated integrity check (for example, several accounts voting from one browser).
Your vote is saved. It will count once you verify your email address. Verify on your account page.
Your vote counts nationally. Add your home ZIP code to count in your state and district too.
Your vote counts nationally and in .
Reason saved privately; it is shown only if it passes review.
Verified participants nationwide · n =
Self-selected participants, not a random sample; ± is the 95% sampling margin.
Not enough verified votes yet. Results publish at verified votes.
A sudden surge of votes on this item was flagged and is under review; votes from new accounts in that surge are held out until it is resolved.
For journalists and bloggers
“Embed this grade”
Free to use with the link back. The badge and card update when the grade changes. Embed terms →
