S. 5036 explained  ·  119th Congress  ·  Pending in Congress

Judicial Integrity Act

Create a free account or sign in to follow S. 5036 and get alerts. Policy area: Crime and Law Enforcement Create a free account or sign in to follow the Crime and Law Enforcement policy area and get alerts. ▲ 91 days since action Sponsor: Adam B. Schiff, CA-Senate, D → Congress.gov

Cosponsors: 3 (3 D, 0 R) · per Congress.gov, 2026-10-15

Introduced: 2026-07-20

Latest action (2026-07-20): Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.

What S. 5036 does, in plain terms

The Congressional Research Service has not published a summary of S. 5036 yet. Its official title: “Judicial Integrity Act”.

Constitution Index

“VFA Constitution grade”

Not graded yet

S. 5036 has not been graded yet. New measures with an official summary are graded daily under the published rubric.

The Framers

“Founders’ Verdict”

CONSTITUTIONAL

Confidence 0.85

Archived SI output (machine-generated)

No editorial review recorded. This historical SI verdict was machine-generated by software and predates the review desk; check it against the official bill text.

Synthesis

The bill is constitutional as a proper exercise of Congress's power under the Necessary and Proper Clause to regulate the conduct of federal judicial officers to prevent conflicts of interest and ensure impartial justice, consistent with the principles of separation of powers and judicial independence.

Hamilton YES

This bill is clearly constitutional as it falls within the power of Congress to regulate the conduct of federal officers under the Necessary and Proper Clause, and it directly enforces the principle that no person shall hold any office under the United States who is interested in the decision, as implied by the Constitution's prohibition on titles of nobility and the requirement of impartial justice. The bill's prohibition on judicial officers engaging in official acts affecting their personal financial interests is a proper exercise of Congress's authority to ensure the integrity of the feder…

Article I, Section 8, Clause 18 Article II, Section 1, Clause 7
Jefferson YES

This bill aligns with the fundamental principle that no officer of government should be a judge in his own cause, a maxim essential to free government. The Constitution vests the judicial power in independent courts, but independence does not grant immunity from the common law of conflicts of interest. The bill properly restricts federal judges and judicial employees from official acts that affect their personal financial interests, thereby preserving the purity of the judicial branch and the public trust. Such a prohibition is a necessary regulation of the judiciary's internal operations, con…

Article III, Section 1 (vesting judicial power in independent courts, implying a duty of impartiality) Amendment IX (the enumeration of certain rights shall not be construed to deny others retained by the people, including the right to impartial tribunals)
Madison CONDITIONAL

This bill seeks to prohibit officers and employees of the judiciary from engaging in official acts affecting their personal financial interests. While Congress possesses the authority under the Necessary and Proper Clause to enact laws that ensure the integrity of the federal government, including the judiciary, such legislation must not undermine the independence of the judicial branch as established by Article III. The Constitution vests the judicial power in independent courts, and any congressional regulation of judicial conduct must be carefully tailored to avoid encroaching upon the core…

Article I, Section 8, Clause 18 (Necessary and Proper Clause) Article III, Section 1 (Judicial Power) Federalist No. 78 (Judicial Independence) Federalist No. 47 (Separation of Powers)
Marshall YES

This bill is a proper exercise of Congress's power under the Necessary and Proper Clause to ensure the integrity of the federal judiciary. The Constitution vests in Congress the authority to make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the powers vested in the government of the United States, including the judicial branch. Prohibiting officers and employees of the judiciary from engaging in official acts that affect their personal financial interests is a reasonable regulation to prevent corruption and maintain public confidence. It does not impair the essentia…

Article I, Section 8, Clause 18 (Necessary and Proper Clause) McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) (implied powers of Congress)
Report an error in this Founders' Verdict
No account needed. Or email hello@valuesforamerica.com. How reports are handled.

What should pass

“VFA SI Solution”

No solution yet

A sourced SI draft appears here once it passes automated checks (Constitution citation, source verification, independent SI critic). How publication works.

Share card

1200×675 PNG for X, Threads, LinkedIn and messages. Free to share with a link back to this page.

For journalists and bloggers

“Embed this grade”

Free to use with the link back. The badge and card update when the grade changes. Embed terms →

VFA Constitution grade for S. 5036

← Back to the Republic