Real bill currently in Congress  c/o  S/119/2677

A bill to expand the sharing of information with respect to suspected violations of intellectual property rights in trade.

Policy area: Foreign Trade and International Finance ▲ 25 days since action Sponsor: Chuck Grassley, IA-Senate, R → Congress.gov

Latest action (2026-08-10): Held at the desk.

Official summary

This bill expands the authority of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to provide information to certain persons (e.g., trademark or copyright owners) regarding suspected violations of intellectual property rights in trade. Under current law, if CBP suspects that merchandise is being imported in violation of certain trademark and copyright laws, it may request assistance from specified persons when determining whether the merchandise is imported in violation of these laws. To permit the party to conduct examination and testing, CBP must provide them with specified information that appears on the merchandise and its packaging and labels. This bill (1) expands the definition of person to allow CBP to request assistance from any other appropriate party with an interest in the imported merchandise, and (2) expands the scope of information that CBP is authorized to share with others to include information on and images of packing materials and shipping containers. The bill allows CBP to request this assistance if it has a reasonable suspicion (currently, suspects) that the merchandise being imported is in violation of certain trademark and copyright laws. Additionally, CBP may provide a person with nonpublic information about the imported merchandise that was generated by an online marketplace or similar market platform, express consignment operator, freight forwarder, or any other entity that plays a role in the sale, importation, or facilitation of the merchandise into the United States and has been provided to, shared with, or obtained by CBP.

The Framers

“Founders’ Verdict”

CONSTITUTIONAL

Confidence 0.75

Synthesis

The bill is a constitutional exercise of Congress's power to regulate foreign commerce and to secure exclusive rights to authors and inventors. The expansion of information sharing by Customs and Border Protection is a necessary and proper means to enforce intellectual property rights in imports, and does not violate any express constitutional prohibition.

Hamilton YES

The proposed bill is a proper exercise of Congress's power to regulate foreign commerce and to secure exclusive rights to authors and inventors. By expanding the authority of Customs and Border Protection to share information with right holders, it strengthens enforcement against counterfeit and pirated goods entering the United States. This falls squarely within the federal government's constitutional duties to protect intellectual property and to police the flow of imports, and it serves the general welfare by promoting innovation and fair trade. The sharing of nonpublic information obtained…

Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 Article I, Section 8, Clause 8 Federalist No. 11
Jefferson NO

This bill offends the spirit of the Fourth Amendment, which secures the people against unreasonable searches and seizures, and the Tenth Amendment, which reserves to the States or the people all powers not delegated to the United States. Expanding the sharing of nonpublic information—including images of packing materials and data from online marketplaces—with private parties upon mere 'reasonable suspicion' rather than probable cause or a warrant, grants federal agents a power to expose private commercial transactions without judicial oversight. Moreover, the Constitution nowhere delegates to …

Amendment IV Amendment X
Madison YES

This bill is a constitutional exercise of Congress's power to regulate foreign commerce. The authority to control imports and protect intellectual property rights in trade is a core aspect of the foreign commerce power under Article I, Section 8, Clause 3. The expansion of information sharing by Customs and Border Protection to facilitate the detection of trademark and copyright violations is a necessary and proper means to enforce those laws, as authorized by the Necessary and Proper Clause (Article I, Section 8, Clause 18). The bill does not exceed the enumerated powers of the federal govern…

Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 Article I, Section 8, Clause 18 Federalist No. 42
Marshall YES

This bill is constitutional as it falls within the enumerated power of Congress to regulate foreign commerce. The Constitution grants Congress the authority 'To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations' (Article I, Section 8, Clause 3). The expansion of information sharing by Customs and Border Protection to enforce intellectual property rights in imported merchandise is a proper exercise of this power, as it directly relates to the flow of goods across national borders. Moreover, the necessary and proper clause (Article I, Section 8, Clause 18) authorizes Congress to make all laws which shall b…

Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 (Commerce Clause) Article I, Section 8, Clause 18 (Necessary and Proper Clause) McCulloch v. Maryland (1819)

What should pass

“AI Consensus Solution”

No solution yet

Daily synthesis runs at 06:00 UTC. This bill's consensus draft will appear on the next pass.

← Back to the Republic