Real bill currently in Congress  c/o  S/119/2398

Kay Hagan Tick Reauthorization Act

Policy area: Health ▲ 25 days since action Sponsor: Susan M. Collins, ME-Senate, R → Congress.gov

Latest action (2026-08-10): Held at the desk.

The Framers

“Founders’ Verdict”

CONDITIONAL

Confidence 0.75

Synthesis

The reauthorization is constitutional only if narrowly confined to interstate commerce and federal enumerated powers, does not impose unfunded mandates or commandeer state governments, and is tailored to genuine interstate public health concerns.

Hamilton YES

This bill, concerning the reauthorization of a health-related measure, falls within the enumerated powers of Congress under Article I, Section 8, Clause 1, which grants Congress the power to 'provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States.' The regulation of public health, particularly the prevention of disease through tick-borne illness surveillance and control, is a legitimate object of the general welfare. Additionally, the Necessary and Proper Clause (Article I, Section 8, Clause 18) empowers Congress to enact laws that are appropriate to carry out its enumerated p…

Article I, Section 8, Clause 1 Article I, Section 8, Clause 18 Federalist No. 33
Jefferson CONDITIONAL

The proposed act, being a reauthorization of federal spending on tick-borne disease research and prevention, must be examined under the strict limits of enumerated powers. The Constitution grants Congress no general police power over public health; such authority resides with the states and the people under the Tenth Amendment. However, if this act is narrowly confined to matters of interstate commerce—such as regulating ticks that cross state lines or funding research that directly facilitates such commerce—it may pass constitutional muster. Yet, any provision that extends federal control ove…

Amendment X Article I, Section 8, Clause 3
Madison CONDITIONAL

The proposed legislation, if it merely reauthorizes existing federal programs for tick-borne disease research and prevention, may be consistent with the enumerated powers of Congress, particularly the power to provide for the general welfare and to regulate interstate commerce, as such diseases do not respect state boundaries and their control may require national coordination. However, the Constitution grants Congress only limited and enumerated powers, and any expansion of federal authority beyond those bounds would be an encroachment upon the reserved powers of the states. Therefore, the co…

Article I, Section 8, Clause 1 Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 Federalist No. 45 Federalist No. 10
Marshall CONDITIONAL

This bill, concerning the reauthorization of tick-related health measures, must be examined under the principles of enumerated powers and necessary and proper means. The Constitution grants Congress power to regulate interstate commerce (Article I, Section 8, Clause 3) and to make all laws necessary and proper for executing that power (Article I, Section 8, Clause 18). If the tick-borne disease measures directly affect interstate commerce—such as by preventing the spread of disease across state lines or regulating the sale of related products—then Congress may act, as held in Gibbons v. Ogden …

Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 Article I, Section 8, Clause 18 Gibbons v. Ogden (1824) Marbury v. Madison (1803)

What should pass

“AI Consensus Solution”

No solution yet

Daily synthesis runs at 06:00 UTC. This bill's consensus draft will appear on the next pass.

← Back to the Republic