H.Res. 93 explained · 119th Congress · Pending in Congress
Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 27) to amend the Controlled Substances Act with respect to the scheduling of fentanyl-related substances, and for other purposes.
Cosponsors: none · per Congress.gov, 2026-10-12
Introduced: 2025-02-04
Latest action (2025-02-05): Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
What H.Res. 93 does, in plain terms
This resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 27, the Halt All Lethal Trafficking of Fentanyl Act or the HALT Fentanyl Act. Specifically, it waives all points of order against consideration of the bill. Under the resolution, the bill is to be considered as amended according to changes by the Rules Committee in its report accompanying the resolution.
Official summary by the Congressional Research Service, via Congress.gov.
Constitution Index
“VFA Constitution grade”
Constitutionally sound
Graded 2026-10-10
SI-generated grade · five published checks · not individually reviewed by a person · methodology
This resolution is a procedural rule governing floor consideration of a bill. It does not itself enact substantive law, regulate conduct, or infringe upon any constitutional right. It merely sets the terms for debate and amendment, which is a core function of each house of Congress under Article I, Section 5. The resolution does not exceed enumerated powers, does not implicate the Bill of Rights, does not restrict individual sovereignty, does not consolidate power upward (it is a purely internal legislative procedure), and does not affect due process or property rights. The grade is A.
-
✓ Passes · Enumerated powers
The resolution is a procedural measure under Article I, Section 5, Clause 2, which grants each house of Congress the authority to determine the rules of its proceedings. It does not exercise any substantive legislative power beyond that internal authority. The underlying bill, H.R. 27, would amend the Controlled Substances Act, which is within Congress's power under the Commerce Clause (Article I,… -
✓ Passes · Bill of Rights
The resolution does not restrict speech, religion, assembly, press, petition, arms, quartering, search and seizure, self-incrimination, due process, takings, trial rights, jury rights, cruel and unusual punishment, or any other right protected by the first ten amendments. It is a purely procedural rule for legislative debate and does not affect the rights of any person outside Congress. -
✓ Passes · Individual sovereignty
The resolution imposes no restrictions on individual conduct, property, speech, labor, or belief. It only governs how the House of Representatives will consider a bill. It does not place any burden on individuals, and no compelling constitutional justification is needed because no individual right is implicated. -
✓ Passes · Decentralization
This resolution is a matter of internal legislative procedure for the House of Representatives. It does not involve any action that could be handled by individuals, local communities, or states, because it is a federal legislative rule. It does not consolidate decision-making upward; it is already at the federal level, but it is a necessary function of the federal legislature under the Constitutio… -
✓ Passes · Due process and takings
The resolution does not affect any person's procedural or substantive due process rights, nor does it take any property. It is a procedural rule for legislative consideration and does not adjudicate rights or impose penalties. The underlying bill, if enacted, would be subject to due process analysis, but this resolution itself is not.
Sources: Congress.gov: HRES 93 summary
Report an error in this grade
What should pass
“VFA SI Solution”
No solution yet
A sourced SI draft appears here once it passes automated checks (Constitution citation, source verification, independent SI critic). How publication works.
Related on VFA
For journalists and bloggers
“Embed this grade”
Free to use with the link back. The badge and card update when the grade changes. Embed terms →