H.Res. 572 explained  ·  119th Congress  ·  Pending in Congress

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that Naval Air Station Oceana in Virginia Beach, Virginia, should remain a critical component of the future carrier-based strike fighter capability of the Navy and receive F-35C squadrons as part of the modernization strategy of the Navy.

Create a free account or sign in to follow H.Res. 572 and get alerts. Policy area: Armed Forces and National Security Create a free account or sign in to follow the Armed Forces and National Security policy area and get alerts. ▲ 467 days since action Sponsor: Jennifer A. Kiggans, VA-02, R → Congress.gov

Cosponsors: 4 (1 D, 3 R) · per Congress.gov, 2026-10-11

Introduced: 2025-07-10

Latest action (2025-07-10): Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.

What H.Res. 572 does, in plain terms

The Congressional Research Service has not published a summary of H.Res. 572 yet. Its official title: “Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that Naval Air Station Oceana in Virginia Beach, Virginia, should remain a critical component of the future carrier-based strike fighter capability of the Navy and receive F-35C squadrons as part of the modernization strategy of the Navy.”.

Constitution Index

“VFA Constitution grade”

Not graded yet

H.Res. 572 has not been graded yet. New measures with an official summary are graded daily under the published rubric.

What should pass

“VFA SI Solution”

No solution yet

A sourced SI draft appears here once it passes automated checks (Constitution citation, source verification, independent SI critic). How publication works.

Share card

1200×675 PNG for X, Threads, LinkedIn and messages. Free to share with a link back to this page.

For journalists and bloggers

“Embed this grade”

Free to use with the link back. The badge and card update when the grade changes. Embed terms →

VFA Constitution grade for H.Res. 572

← Back to the Republic