H.Res. 489 explained · 119th Congress · Pending in Congress
Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 884) to prohibit individuals who are not citizens of the United States from voting in elections in the District of Columbia and to repeal the Local Resident Voting Rights Amendment Act of 2022; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 2056) to require the District of Columbia to comply with federal immigration laws; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 2096) to restore the right to negotiate matters pertaining to the discipline of law enforcement officers of the District of Columbia through collective bargaining, to restore the statute of limitations for bringing disciplinary cases against members or civilian employees of the Metropolitan Police Department of the District of Columbia, and for other purposes; and providing for consideration of the bill (S. 331) to amend the Controlled Substances Act with respect to the scheduling of fentanyl-related substances, and for other purposes.
Cosponsors: none · per Congress.gov, 2026-10-11
Introduced: 2025-06-09
Latest action (2025-06-10): Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
What H.Res. 489 does, in plain terms
The Congressional Research Service has not published a summary of H.Res. 489 yet. Its official title: “Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 884) to prohibit individuals who are not citizens of the United States from voting in elections in the District of Columbia and to repeal the Local Resident Voting Rights Amendment Act of 2022; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 2056) to require the District of Columbia to comply with federal immigration laws; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 2096) to restore the right to negotiate matters pertaining to the discipline of law enforcement officers of the District of Columbia through collective bargaining, to restore the statute of limitations for bringing disciplinary cases against members or civilian employees of the Metropolitan Police Department of the District of Columbia, and for other purposes; and providing for consideration of the bill (S. 331) to amend the Controlled Substances Act with respect to the scheduling of fentanyl-related substances, and for other purposes.”.
Constitution Index
“VFA Constitution grade”
Minor constitutional concerns
Graded 2026-10-10
SI-generated grade · five published checks · not individually reviewed by a person · methodology
This resolution is a procedural rule governing floor consideration of four substantive bills. It does not itself enact policy but sets the terms for debate and amendment. The resolution is within Congress's constitutional authority to determine its own rules of proceeding (Article I, Section 5, Clause 2). It does not directly infringe on rights, though it waives points of order, which can limit procedural objections. The underlying bills raise constitutional questions, but the resolution itself is a procedural vehicle. The grade reflects minor tension due to the waiver of points of order, which can expedite consideration of potentially problematic legislation.
-
✓ Passes · Enumerated powers
The Constitution grants each house of Congress the power to determine the rules of its proceedings (Article I, Section 5, Clause 2). This resolution is a rule for considering specific bills, so it falls squarely within that enumerated power. It does not itself exercise any substantive legislative authority beyond setting the terms of debate and amendment. -
✓ Passes · Bill of Rights
The resolution does not directly infringe on any of the first ten amendments. It is a procedural rule that governs how the House will consider certain bills. While the underlying bills may implicate rights (e.g., voting, immigration, collective bargaining), the resolution itself does not restrict speech, religion, assembly, press, petition, arms, quartering, search and seizure, self-incrimination,… -
✓ Passes · Individual sovereignty
The resolution does not restrict individual liberty directly. It merely sets the terms for considering legislation. The underlying bills could affect individual sovereignty (e.g., voting rights, immigration enforcement, collective bargaining), but the resolution itself does not impose any restriction on what individuals can do with their person, property, speech, labor, or belief. The burden of ju… -
✓ Passes · Decentralization
This resolution is a purely procedural matter for the House of Representatives. It does not consolidate decision-making at a higher level of government than necessary; it is the House exercising its own internal rule-making authority. The questions of whether the underlying bills should be handled at the federal, state, or local level are not addressed by this resolution. The resolution itself doe… -
✓ Passes · Due process and takings
The resolution does not bypass due process or take property. It is a procedural rule that waives points of order, which are internal parliamentary objections, not constitutional due process protections. The resolution does not deprive any person of life, liberty, or property without due process of law, nor does it take private property for public use without just compensation. The underlying bills…
Report an error in this grade
What should pass
“VFA SI Solution”
No solution yet
A sourced SI draft appears here once it passes automated checks (Constitution citation, source verification, independent SI critic). How publication works.
Related on VFA
For journalists and bloggers
“Embed this grade”
Free to use with the link back. The badge and card update when the grade changes. Embed terms →