H.Res. 1480 explained  ·  119th Congress  ·  Pending in Congress

Honoring the lives, work, and sacrifice of Joseph Curseen, Jr., and Thomas Morris, Jr., the 2 United States Postal Service employees who died as a result of their contact with anthrax while working at the United States Postal facility located at 900 Brentwood Road NE, Washington, DC, during the anthrax attack in the fall of 2001; United States Postal Service employees, who have continued to work diligently in service to the people of the United States notwithstanding the anthrax attack; as well as the other 3 Americans who died and the 17 who became ill in the attack.

Create a free account or sign in to follow H.Res. 1480 and get alerts. Policy area: Government Operations and Politics Create a free account or sign in to follow the Government Operations and Politics policy area and get alerts. ▲ 70 days since action Sponsor: Eleanor Holmes Norton, DC-00, D → Congress.gov

Cosponsors: none · per Congress.gov, 2026-10-14

Introduced: 2026-08-10

Latest action (2026-08-10): Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.

What H.Res. 1480 does, in plain terms

The Congressional Research Service has not published a summary of H.Res. 1480 yet. Its official title: “Honoring the lives, work, and sacrifice of Joseph Curseen, Jr., and Thomas Morris, Jr., the 2 United States Postal Service employees who died as a result of their contact with anthrax while working at the United States Postal facility located at 900 Brentwood Road NE, Washington, DC, during the anthrax attack in the fall of 2001; United States Postal Service employees, who have continued to work diligently in service to the people of the United States notwithstanding the anthrax attack; as well as the other 3 Americans who died and the 17 who became ill in the attack.”.

Constitution Index

“VFA Constitution grade”

Not graded yet

H.Res. 1480 has not been graded yet. New measures with an official summary are graded daily under the published rubric.

The Framers

“Founders’ Verdict”

CONSTITUTIONAL

Confidence 1.00

Archived SI output (machine-generated)

No editorial review recorded. This historical SI verdict was machine-generated by software and predates the review desk; check it against the official bill text.

Synthesis

All four founders agree that the resolution is a non-binding, hortatory expression of honor and remembrance, well within the inherent and enumerated powers of Congress, and does not constitute a law, impose obligations, or exceed constitutional limits.

Hamilton YES

This resolution is a simple expression of honor and recognition by the House of Representatives. It does not create any new law, impose any obligation, or expend any public funds. The Constitution grants each House the power to determine the rules of its proceedings (Article I, Section 5, Clause 2) and to express its sentiments through resolutions. Such expressions are a customary and inherent part of legislative deliberation, consistent with the principle that the legislature may address matters of public concern without exceeding its enumerated powers. The resolution does not infringe upon a…

Article I, Section 5, Clause 2 Federalist No. 65
Jefferson YES

This resolution is a mere expression of honor and remembrance, not a law binding the people. The Constitution grants Congress the power to conduct its proceedings and to express its sentiments on matters of public concern. By its nature, a resolution of this kind does not exceed the enumerated powers of the federal government, nor does it abridge the liberties of the people. It neither imposes taxation, nor regulates commerce, nor exercises any coercive authority. Indeed, to honor those who died in service to their country is a virtuous act, consistent with the principles of a free republic. A…

Article I, Section 1 Amendment X
Madison YES

This resolution is a ceremonial expression of respect and honor for public servants, not an exercise of legislative power to regulate conduct or appropriate funds. The Constitution vests Congress with legislative authority (Article I, Section 1), which necessarily includes the power to issue non-binding resolutions that memorialize service and sacrifice. Such resolutions neither enlarge federal jurisdiction nor infringe upon the reserved powers of the states. They are consistent with the limited and defined nature of federal powers, as the resolution imposes no obligation and conflicts with no…

Article I, Section 1 Federalist No. 45
Marshall YES

This resolution is a simple expression of honor and gratitude for the service and sacrifice of United States Postal Service employees. The Constitution vests in Congress the power to establish post offices and post roads (Article I, Section 8, Clause 7), and from this power flows the authority to recognize and commend those who serve in the postal system. Such a resolution does not infringe upon any enumerated power, nor does it violate the separation of powers; it is a legitimate exercise of legislative discretion to acknowledge the public service of those who died or were afflicted in the li…

Article I, Section 8, Clause 7 McCulloch v. Maryland (1819)
Report an error in this Founders' Verdict
No account needed. Or email hello@valuesforamerica.com. How reports are handled.

What should pass

“VFA SI Solution”

No solution yet

A sourced SI draft appears here once it passes automated checks (Constitution citation, source verification, independent SI critic). How publication works.

Share card

1200×675 PNG for X, Threads, LinkedIn and messages. Free to share with a link back to this page.

For journalists and bloggers

“Embed this grade”

Free to use with the link back. The badge and card update when the grade changes. Embed terms →

VFA Constitution grade for H.Res. 1480

← Back to the Republic