H.Res. 1467 explained  ·  119th Congress  ·  Pending in Congress

Protecting Deliberative Process in the House Resolution

Create a free account or sign in to follow H.Res. 1467 and get alerts. Policy area: Congress Create a free account or sign in to follow the Congress policy area and get alerts. ▲ 81 days since action Sponsor: Ryan Mackenzie, PA-07, R → Congress.gov

Cosponsors: none · per Congress.gov, 2026-10-14

Introduced: 2026-07-30

Latest action (2026-07-30): Referred to the House Committee on Rules.

What H.Res. 1467 does, in plain terms

The Congressional Research Service has not published a summary of H.Res. 1467 yet. Its official title: “Protecting Deliberative Process in the House Resolution”.

Constitution Index

“VFA Constitution grade”

Not graded yet

H.Res. 1467 has not been graded yet. New measures with an official summary are graded daily under the published rubric.

The Framers

“Founders’ Verdict”

CONDITIONAL

Confidence 0.75

Archived SI output (machine-generated)

No editorial review recorded. This historical SI verdict was machine-generated by software and predates the review desk; check it against the official bill text.

Synthesis

The resolution is constitutional only if it does not infringe upon members' freedom of speech and debate (Article I, Section 6, Clause 1), does not conceal proceedings from the public in a manner undermining accountability, and does not impair the House's essential legislative functions or its authority to determine its own rules.

Hamilton YES

This resolution, which protects the deliberative process within the House, is consistent with the constitutional authority of each chamber to determine its own rules of proceedings. Article I, Section 5, Clause 2 grants each House the power to 'determine the Rules of its Proceedings,' and this resolution is a proper exercise of that authority to safeguard the integrity of legislative debate and decision-making. The protection of internal deliberations is essential to the independence of the legislative branch, as argued in Federalist No. 71, where the necessity of a deliberate sense of the com…

Article I, Section 5, Clause 2 Federalist No. 71 Federalist No. 73
Jefferson NO

This resolution, by seeking to protect the deliberative process in the House, appears to restrict the free flow of information and debate among the people's representatives. The Constitution vests all legislative powers in Congress, but the First Amendment guarantees the right of the people to petition the government for redress of grievances and to freely discuss public affairs. Any measure that would shield legislative deliberations from public scrutiny undermines the principle of popular sovereignty and the accountability of representatives to their constituents. Furthermore, the Tenth Amen…

Amendment I Amendment X
Madison CONDITIONAL

This resolution, which seeks to protect the deliberative process in the House, touches upon the internal governance of the legislative branch. The Constitution grants each House the power to determine the rules of its proceedings (Article I, Section 5, Clause 2). Therefore, the House may generally adopt such a resolution to regulate its own debate and committee procedures. However, the resolution must not infringe upon the rights of members to express their views on public measures, as the freedom of speech and debate in Congress is secured by Article I, Section 6, Clause 1. Furthermore, any a…

Article I, Section 5, Clause 2 Article I, Section 6, Clause 1 Federalist No. 57
Marshall CONDITIONAL

This resolution, if it seeks to protect the deliberative process by limiting the House's ability to gather information or debate, may conflict with the constitutional power of each House to determine the rules of its proceedings under Article I, Section 5, Clause 2. However, if it merely codifies existing practices without infringing on the House's inherent authority to conduct investigations and deliberate, it may be permissible. The Constitution vests Congress with all legislative powers, and any restriction that undermines the necessary means to exercise those powers, as established in McCu…

Article I, Section 5, Clause 2 McCulloch v. Maryland (1819)
Report an error in this Founders' Verdict
No account needed. Or email hello@valuesforamerica.com. How reports are handled.

What should pass

“VFA SI Solution”

No solution yet

A sourced SI draft appears here once it passes automated checks (Constitution citation, source verification, independent SI critic). How publication works.

Share card

1200×675 PNG for X, Threads, LinkedIn and messages. Free to share with a link back to this page.

For journalists and bloggers

“Embed this grade”

Free to use with the link back. The badge and card update when the grade changes. Embed terms →

VFA Constitution grade for H.Res. 1467

← Back to the Republic