H.Res. 1466 explained  ·  119th Congress  ·  Pending in Congress

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to prohibit a Member, Delegate, or Resident Commissioner from cohabitating with any employee of the House of Representatives.

Create a free account or sign in to follow H.Res. 1466 and get alerts. Policy area: Congress Create a free account or sign in to follow the Congress policy area and get alerts. ▲ 82 days since action Sponsor: Nancy Mace, SC-01, R → Congress.gov

Cosponsors: none · per Congress.gov, 2026-10-14

Introduced: 2026-07-30

Latest action (2026-07-30): Referred to the House Committee on Ethics.

What H.Res. 1466 does, in plain terms

The Congressional Research Service has not published a summary of H.Res. 1466 yet. Its official title: “Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to prohibit a Member, Delegate, or Resident Commissioner from cohabitating with any employee of the House of Representatives.”.

Constitution Index

“VFA Constitution grade”

Not graded yet

H.Res. 1466 has not been graded yet. New measures with an official summary are graded daily under the published rubric.

The Framers

“Founders’ Verdict”

UNCONSTITUTIONAL

Confidence 0.50

Archived SI output (machine-generated)

No editorial review recorded. This historical SI verdict was machine-generated by software and predates the review desk; check it against the official bill text.

Synthesis

The bill exceeds the proper scope of House rulemaking under Article I, Section 5, Clause 2, which is confined to legislative procedure and internal governance. Prohibiting cohabitation intrudes upon private domestic relations, which are not within enumerated powers and are reserved to the states or the people under the Tenth Amendment, and may infringe upon rights of association protected by the First and Ninth Amendments.

Hamilton NO

This bill exceeds the proper scope of House rulemaking under Article I, Section 5, Clause 2, which grants each House authority to 'determine the Rules of its Proceedings.' That power is confined to the regulation of legislative procedure and the internal governance of the chamber's official business. Prohibiting cohabitation between Members and House employees intrudes upon private domestic relations, which are not a matter of legislative proceeding or the orderly conduct of House business. The Constitution does not empower the House to regulate the personal living arrangements of its Members,…

Article I, Section 5, Clause 2 Tenth Amendment Federalist No. 33
Jefferson NO

The proposed rule, by prohibiting a Member of the House from cohabitating with any House employee, exceeds the proper boundaries of legislative rule-making and infringes upon rights reserved to the people. The Constitution grants each House authority to determine its own rules (Article I, Section 5, Clause 2), but this power is not absolute; it must be exercised in conformity with the Bill of Rights and the principle of enumerated powers. The First Amendment protects the freedom of association, which includes the intimate relationship of cohabitation. Moreover, the Ninth Amendment declares tha…

Amendment I Amendment IX Amendment X Article I, Section 5, Clause 2
Madison YES

The Constitution grants each House the authority to determine the rules of its proceedings, and a rule prohibiting a Member from cohabitating with a House employee falls within the legitimate sphere of internal governance to preserve decorum, prevent conflicts of interest, and maintain public trust. The rule does not alter the constitutional qualifications for office, which are fixed by Article I, Section 2, Clause 2, and does not conflict with any enumerated right. The House's power to discipline its members and regulate its own affairs is broad, as the Federalist Papers underscore the necess…

Article I, Section 5, Clause 2 Federalist No. 52
Marshall YES

The Constitution vests in each House the power to determine the Rules of its Proceedings, and to punish its Members for disorderly Behaviour. This rule, which prohibits a Member from cohabitating with any House employee, is a regulation of conduct within the House's sphere of self-governance. It does not alter the qualifications for office prescribed by the Constitution, which are exclusive. The House may adopt such means as are appropriate to preserve the integrity of its proceedings, and this rule is a permissible exercise of the rule-making authority under Article I, Section 5. As Chief Jus…

Article I, Section 5, Clause 2: Each House may determine the Rules of its Proceedings, punish its Members for disorderly Behaviour, and, with the Concurrence of two thirds, expel a Member. McCulloch v. Maryland (1819): The Necessary and Proper Clause authorizes Congress to employ any means not prohibited by the Constitution that are appropriate to carry into execution its enumerated powers.
Report an error in this Founders' Verdict
No account needed. Or email hello@valuesforamerica.com. How reports are handled.

What should pass

“VFA SI Solution”

No solution yet

A sourced SI draft appears here once it passes automated checks (Constitution citation, source verification, independent SI critic). How publication works.

Share card

1200×675 PNG for X, Threads, LinkedIn and messages. Free to share with a link back to this page.

For journalists and bloggers

“Embed this grade”

Free to use with the link back. The badge and card update when the grade changes. Embed terms →

VFA Constitution grade for H.Res. 1466

← Back to the Republic