H.Res. 1009 explained  ·  119th Congress  ·  Pending in Congress

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 6945) to amend part A of title IV of the Social Security Act to clarify the authority of States to use funds for pregnancy centers, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 6359) to require institutions of higher education to disseminate information on the rights of, and accommodations and resources for, pregnant students, and for other purposes; and providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 140) providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to Public Land Order No. 7917 for Withdrawal of Federal Lands; Cook, Lake, and Saint Louis Counties, MN.

Create a free account or sign in to follow H.Res. 1009 and get alerts. Policy area: Congress Create a free account or sign in to follow the Congress policy area and get alerts. ▲ 271 days since action Sponsor: Austin Scott, GA-08, R → Congress.gov

Cosponsors: none · per Congress.gov, 2026-10-09

Introduced: 2026-01-20

Latest action (2026-01-21): Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

What H.Res. 1009 does, in plain terms

Sets forth the rule for consideration of the bill (H.R. 6945) to amend part A of title IV of the Social Security Act to clarify the authority of States to use funds for pregnancy centers, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 6359) to require institutions of higher education to disseminate information on the rights of, and accommodations and resources for, pregnant students, and for other purposes; and providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 140) providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to Public Land Order No. 7917 for Withdrawal of Federal Lands; Cook, Lake, and Saint Louis Counties, MN.

Official summary by the Congressional Research Service, via Congress.gov.

Constitution Index

“VFA Constitution grade”

A

Constitutionally sound

Graded 2026-10-09

SI-generated grade · five published checks · not individually reviewed by a person · methodology

This resolution is a procedural rule for considering three separate bills. It does not itself enact any substantive policy, restrict rights, or exercise any power beyond Congress's constitutional authority to set its own internal rules of proceeding under Article I, Section 5, Clause 2. No constitutional rights are infringed, no individual sovereignty is restricted, no power is consolidated upward, and no due process or takings issues arise. The grade reflects the purely procedural nature of the measure.

  • ✓ Passes · Enumerated powers
    Article I, Section 5, Clause 2 of the Constitution grants each House of Congress the authority to 'determine the Rules of its Proceedings.' This resolution is a rule for considering three bills and falls squarely within that enumerated power. It does not itself authorize any substantive government action.
  • ✓ Passes · Bill of Rights
    The resolution is a procedural rule for floor consideration. It does not restrict speech, religion, assembly, press, petition, arms, or any other right protected by the Bill of Rights. It does not authorize search, seizure, or any infringement of the first ten amendments.
  • ✓ Passes · Individual sovereignty
    The resolution imposes no restriction on any individual's person, property, speech, labor, or belief. It merely sets the terms for debating and voting on three bills. No individual sovereignty is burdened.
  • ✓ Passes · Decentralization
    This is a purely internal procedural action by Congress. It does not consolidate decision-making at any level of government; it is the minimum necessary action for Congress to conduct its own business. All four decentralization questions are satisfied.
  • ✓ Passes · Due process and takings
    The resolution does not deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, nor does it take any private property. It does not bypass any procedural protections. No due process or takings issue arises.

Sources: Congress.gov: HRES 1009 summary

Report an error in this grade
No account needed. Or email hello@valuesforamerica.com. How reports are handled.

What should pass

“VFA SI Solution”

No solution yet

A sourced SI draft appears here once it passes automated checks (Constitution citation, source verification, independent SI critic). How publication works.

Share card

1200×675 PNG for X, Threads, LinkedIn and messages. Free to share with a link back to this page.

For journalists and bloggers

“Embed this grade”

Free to use with the link back. The badge and card update when the grade changes. Embed terms →

VFA Constitution grade for H.Res. 1009

← Back to the Republic