H.R. 9990 explained  ·  119th Congress  ·  Pending in Congress

Increasing Mental Health Options Act of 2026

Create a free account or sign in to follow H.R. 9990 and get alerts. Policy area: Health Create a free account or sign in to follow the Health policy area and get alerts. ▲ 81 days since action Sponsor: Nicole Malliotakis, NY-11, R → Congress.gov

Cosponsors: 3 (2 D, 1 R) · per Congress.gov, 2026-10-14

Introduced: 2026-07-30

Latest action (2026-07-30): Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

What H.R. 9990 does, in plain terms

Increasing Mental Health Options Act of 2026 This bill provides for an additional payment for clinical psychologists under Medicare who provide services in designated health professional shortage areas. It also allows clinical psychologists to provide behavioral health services (in accordance with state law) for purposes of hospitalization services, home health services, and other services under Medicare.

Official summary by the Congressional Research Service, via Congress.gov.

Constitution Index

“VFA Constitution grade”

Not graded yet

H.R. 9990 has not been graded yet. New measures with an official summary are graded daily under the published rubric.

The Framers

“Founders’ Verdict”

CONDITIONAL

Confidence 0.50

Archived SI output (machine-generated)

No editorial review recorded. This historical SI verdict was machine-generated by software and predates the review desk; check it against the official bill text.

Synthesis

The Founders are evenly divided: Hamilton and Marshall argue the bill is a valid exercise of Congress's power to tax and spend for the general welfare and the necessary and proper clause, while Madison and Jefferson contend it exceeds enumerated powers and infringes on state sovereignty under the Tenth Amendment. The constitutionality depends on the interpretation of the General Welfare Clause and the scope of federal power.

Hamilton YES

This bill is a valid exercise of Congress's power to tax and spend for the general welfare, as it amends an existing federal program (Medicare) to expand access to psychological and behavioral services. The Constitution grants Congress authority to lay and collect taxes to provide for the general welfare (Article I, Section 8, Clause 1), and the necessary and proper clause (Article I, Section 8, Clause 18) permits Congress to enact laws that are appropriate to carry out its enumerated powers. The Social Security Act, including Title XVIII, has long been upheld as a proper use of the spending p…

Article I, Section 8, Clause 1 Article I, Section 8, Clause 18 Federalist No. 33 Federalist No. 41
Jefferson NO

This bill proposes to expand federal authority over psychological and behavioral services through the Social Security Act, which is not among the enumerated powers granted to Congress in Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution. The Tenth Amendment reserves to the States or the people all powers not delegated to the United States. The regulation of medical and behavioral services is a matter of public health and welfare properly belonging to the States, not the federal government. The General Welfare Clause (Article I, Section 8, Clause 1) does not authorize Congress to assume powers over ever…

Amendment X Article I, Section 8
Madison NO

The proposed legislation seeks to expand federal authority over psychological and behavioral services through the Social Security Act. The Constitution grants Congress only enumerated powers, and the power to regulate or provide for medical services is not among them. The general Welfare clause (Article I, Section 8, Clause 1) is not an independent grant of power but rather a limitation on the taxing power, as I argued in Federalist No. 41. To interpret it otherwise would render the enumeration of powers meaningless and invite an unlimited federal jurisdiction over all objects of public concer…

Article I, Section 8, Clause 1 (General Welfare Clause, as limited by enumerated powers) Tenth Amendment Federalist No. 41 (on the limited nature of the general welfare clause) Federalist No. 45 (on the few and defined powers of the federal government)
Marshall YES

The Constitution vests in Congress the power to provide for the general welfare and to regulate commerce among the several states. Amending the Social Security Act to expand access to psychological and behavioral services is a proper exercise of these powers. As held in McCulloch v. Maryland, Congress may employ means not expressly enumerated to carry out its powers, so long as they are appropriate and consistent with the letter and spirit of the Constitution. Furthermore, as established in Gibbons v. Ogden, the commerce power extends to all intercourse among the states, and healthcare service…

Article I, Section 8, Clause 1 (General Welfare Clause) Article I, Section 8, Clause 18 (Necessary and Proper Clause) McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) Gibbons v. Ogden (1824)
Report an error in this Founders' Verdict
No account needed. Or email hello@valuesforamerica.com. How reports are handled.

What should pass

“VFA SI Solution”

No solution yet

A sourced SI draft appears here once it passes automated checks (Constitution citation, source verification, independent SI critic). How publication works.

Share card

1200×675 PNG for X, Threads, LinkedIn and messages. Free to share with a link back to this page.

For journalists and bloggers

“Embed this grade”

Free to use with the link back. The badge and card update when the grade changes. Embed terms →

VFA Constitution grade for H.R. 9990

← Back to the Republic