H.R. 9923 explained  ·  119th Congress  ·  Pending in Congress

Biotechnology Diplomacy and Expertise Enhancement Act of 2026

Create a free account or sign in to follow H.R. 9923 and get alerts. Policy area: International Affairs Create a free account or sign in to follow the International Affairs policy area and get alerts. ▲ 88 days since action Sponsor: James C. Moylan, GU-00, R → Congress.gov

Cosponsors: 4 (3 D, 1 R) · per Congress.gov, 2026-10-15

Introduced: 2026-07-23

Latest action (2026-07-23): Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.

What H.R. 9923 does, in plain terms

The Congressional Research Service has not published a summary of H.R. 9923 yet. Its official title: “Biotechnology Diplomacy and Expertise Enhancement Act of 2026”.

Constitution Index

“VFA Constitution grade”

Not graded yet

H.R. 9923 has not been graded yet. New measures with an official summary are graded daily under the published rubric.

The Framers

“Founders’ Verdict”

CONSTITUTIONAL

Confidence 0.75

Archived SI output (machine-generated)

No editorial review recorded. This historical SI verdict was machine-generated by software and predates the review desk; check it against the official bill text.

Synthesis

The bill is a constitutional exercise of Congress's authority under the Commerce Clause (Article I, Section 8, Clause 3) and the Necessary and Proper Clause (Article I, Section 8, Clause 18) to regulate foreign commerce and provide for the common defense and general welfare. The training and deployment of biotechnology experts for international advocacy directly supports U.S. diplomatic and commercial interests abroad, and does not infringe upon the President's diplomatic powers or state reserved powers.

Hamilton YES

This bill falls within the constitutional authority of Congress to regulate commerce with foreign nations and to provide for the common defense and general welfare. Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 grants Congress power over foreign commerce, and the training and deployment of biotechnology experts to advocate for U.S. priorities abroad is a legitimate exercise of that power, as it directly relates to international trade and diplomatic engagement in a critical technological field. Furthermore, Article II, Section 2, Clause 2, which vests the President with the power to appoint ambassadors and ot…

Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 Article I, Section 8, Clause 18 Federalist No. 23
Jefferson NO

The Constitution does not grant Congress the authority to recruit and train biotechnology experts for international advocacy. The enumerated powers in Article I, Section 8 do not include such a program, and the Necessary and Proper Clause cannot be stretched to cover this expansion of federal influence into education and professional training. The Tenth Amendment reserves all powers not delegated to the United States to the states or the people. This bill intrudes upon those reserved powers and represents an overreach of federal authority.

Amendment X Article I, Section 8
Madison YES

This bill concerns the training of federal officers for international advocacy in biotechnology, which directly relates to the conduct of foreign affairs and commerce with foreign nations. The Constitution empowers Congress to regulate commerce with foreign nations and to make all laws necessary and proper for executing its enumerated powers. The training of federal personnel to advance national interests abroad falls within the scope of these powers, as it supports the federal government's role in diplomacy and international engagement. The bill does not infringe upon state powers, as it pert…

Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 Federalist No. 41
Marshall YES

The Constitution vests in Congress the power to regulate commerce with foreign nations and to make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the enumerated powers. This bill, which seeks to recruit and train biotechnology experts for international advocacy and to train Regional Technology Officers in biotechnology, is a measure directly connected to the promotion of United States commerce and interests abroad. As established in McCulloch v. Maryland, Congress possesses implied powers that are appropriate and plainly adapted to a legitimate end, so long as they ar…

Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 (Commerce Clause) Article I, Section 8, Clause 18 (Necessary and Proper Clause) McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) Gibbons v. Ogden (1824)
Report an error in this Founders' Verdict
No account needed. Or email hello@valuesforamerica.com. How reports are handled.

What should pass

“VFA SI Solution”

No solution yet

A sourced SI draft appears here once it passes automated checks (Constitution citation, source verification, independent SI critic). How publication works.

Share card

1200×675 PNG for X, Threads, LinkedIn and messages. Free to share with a link back to this page.

For journalists and bloggers

“Embed this grade”

Free to use with the link back. The badge and card update when the grade changes. Embed terms →

VFA Constitution grade for H.R. 9923

← Back to the Republic