H.R. 9847 explained · 119th Congress · Pending in Congress
Improving CARE for Youth Act
Cosponsors: 4 (4 D, 0 R) · per Congress.gov, 2026-10-15
Introduced: 2026-07-22
Latest action (2026-07-22): Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
What H.R. 9847 does, in plain terms
Improving Coordination and Access to Resources Equitably for Youth Act or the Improving CARE for Youth Act This bill prohibits state Medicaid programs from denying coverage for primary care, substance use disorder, and mental health services that are furnished on the same day at the same office, clinic, or other outpatient facility (including via telehealth).
Official summary by the Congressional Research Service, via Congress.gov.
Constitution Index
“VFA Constitution grade”
Significant constitutional concerns
Graded 2026-10-14
SI-generated grade · five published checks · not individually reviewed by a person · methodology
The bill conditions state Medicaid funding on a coverage mandate, which is a conditional exercise of federal spending power. While Congress has broad authority under the Spending Clause, this mandate intrudes into state administration of Medicaid and may raise Tenth Amendment concerns by effectively compelling states to adopt specific coverage rules. The bill does not directly infringe individual rights, but it centralizes health policy decisions at the federal level, failing the decentralization test. The grade reflects significant structural issues requiring a rewrite to better respect state sovereignty.
-
✓ Passes · Enumerated powers
Congress has authority under Article I, Section 8, Clause 1 (Spending Clause) to attach conditions to federal funds, including Medicaid. The bill operates through Medicaid, a federal-state program, and the mandate is a condition on state receipt of federal funds. This is within Congress's enumerated spending power, though the condition must be unambiguous and related to the federal interest in the… -
✓ Passes · Bill of Rights
The bill does not implicate any of the first ten amendments. It does not restrict speech, religion, assembly, press, petition, arms, quartering, search and seizure, self-incrimination, due process, trial rights, jury rights, cruel and unusual punishment, or unenumerated rights. It is a coverage mandate for state Medicaid programs, not a restriction on individual liberties. -
✓ Passes · Individual sovereignty
The bill expands access to healthcare services by requiring coverage for same-day services. It does not restrict individual autonomy over person, property, speech, labor, or belief. Rather, it enhances individual access to care. There is no burden on individual freedom that requires compelling justification. -
✗ Concern · Decentralization
The bill fails the decentralization test because it consolidates decision-making at the federal level. While individuals and families could not handle Medicaid coverage alone, and local communities cannot administer state Medicaid programs, states are fully capable of determining their own Medicaid coverage policies. The federal mandate overrides state choices, failing question 3 and consolidating… -
✓ Passes · Due process and takings
The bill does not deprive any person of life, liberty, or property without due process, nor does it take private property for public use without just compensation. It imposes a condition on states' receipt of federal funds, which is a legislative act, not an adjudicative one. There is no procedural or substantive due process violation, and no takings issue.
Sources: Congress.gov: HR 9847 summary
Report an error in this grade
What should pass
“VFA SI Solution”
No solution yet
A sourced SI draft appears here once it passes automated checks (Constitution citation, source verification, independent SI critic). How publication works.
Related on VFA
For journalists and bloggers
“Embed this grade”
Free to use with the link back. The badge and card update when the grade changes. Embed terms →