H.R. 9788 explained · 119th Congress · Pending in Congress
FORMULA Act of 2026
Cosponsors: 5 (0 D, 5 R) · per Congress.gov, 2026-10-15
Introduced: 2026-07-20
Latest action (2026-07-20): Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
What H.R. 9788 does, in plain terms
The Congressional Research Service has not published a summary of H.R. 9788 yet. Its official title: “FORMULA Act of 2026”.
Constitution Index
“VFA Constitution grade”
Not graded yet
H.R. 9788 has not been graded yet. New measures with an official summary are graded daily under the published rubric.
The Framers
“Founders’ Verdict”
Confidence 0.75
Archived SI output (machine-generated)No editorial review recorded. This historical SI verdict was machine-generated by software and predates the review desk; check it against the official bill text.
Synthesis
The bill is constitutional under the Commerce Clause (Article I, Section 8, Clause 3) and the Necessary and Proper Clause (Article I, Section 8, Clause 18), as it regulates infant formula, an article of interstate commerce, and establishes uniform safety standards to protect public health. The majority views this as a proper exercise of federal power, consistent with precedent and the enumerated powers, and not an infringement on state sovereignty.
This bill is a proper exercise of Congress's power under the Commerce Clause, as infant formula is an article of interstate commerce, and the regulation of contaminants therein is essential to protect the public health and welfare. The Constitution vests Congress with authority to regulate commerce among the several states (Article I, Section 8, Clause 3), and the establishment of uniform safety standards for infant formula falls squarely within that power, as it prevents harmful products from entering the stream of commerce and ensures the free flow of goods across state lines. Furthermore, t…
This bill exceeds the powers delegated to Congress by the Constitution. The regulation of manufacturing standards for infant formula is a matter of public health and safety, which, under the Tenth Amendment, is reserved to the states. The Commerce Clause (Article I, Section 8) does not grant Congress authority to prescribe such internal manufacturing standards, as they do not directly pertain to interstate commerce but rather to local police powers. I cannot consent to such an expansion of federal authority.
This bill falls within the enumerated power of Congress to regulate interstate commerce, as infant formula is a product distributed across state lines. The Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act is a valid exercise of that power, and establishing safety standards for infant formula is a necessary and proper measure to protect the public health and prevent fraud in the marketplace. The Constitution grants Congress authority to regulate commerce among the several states (Article I, Section 8, Clause 3), and the Tenth Amendment reserves to the states only those powers not delegated to the United St…
This bill is a constitutional exercise of Congress's power under the Commerce Clause, as it regulates the safety of infant formula, an article of interstate commerce. The establishment of maximum permissible levels for contaminants is a necessary and proper measure to ensure the purity and safety of such products, consistent with the principles of McCulloch v. Maryland that Congress may employ means appropriate to legitimate ends. The legislation does not intrude upon state sovereignty, as it sets uniform federal standards for articles moving in commerce, and does not commandeer state regulato…
Report an error in this Founders' Verdict
What should pass
“VFA SI Solution”
No solution yet
A sourced SI draft appears here once it passes automated checks (Constitution citation, source verification, independent SI critic). How publication works.
For journalists and bloggers
“Embed this grade”
Free to use with the link back. The badge and card update when the grade changes. Embed terms →