H.R. 9762 explained · 119th Congress · Pending in Congress
HOLDBACKS Act
Cosponsors: none · per Congress.gov, 2026-10-08
Introduced: 2026-07-16
Latest action (2026-07-16): Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
What H.R. 9762 does, in plain terms
The Congressional Research Service has not published a summary of H.R. 9762 yet. Its official title: “HOLDBACKS Act”.
Constitution Index
“VFA Constitution grade”
Not graded yet
H.R. 9762 has not been graded yet. New measures with an official summary are graded daily under the published rubric.
The Framers
“Founders’ Verdict”
Confidence 0.50
Archived SI output (machine-generated)No editorial review recorded. This historical SI verdict was machine-generated by software and predates the review desk; check it against the official bill text.
Synthesis
The bill is constitutional under the Commerce Clause as a regulation of interstate commerce, provided it is narrowly tailored to transactions substantially affecting interstate commerce and does not encroach upon state police powers or the Tenth Amendment.
This bill regulates the transparency of ticket sales and prohibits the withholding of information on ticket availability. Such regulation falls squarely within the power of Congress to regulate commerce among the several states, as ticket sales are transactions in interstate commerce. The measure is a proper exercise of the commerce power to prevent deceptive practices that distort markets and harm consumers, and it is a necessary and proper means to carry into execution the enumerated power over commerce.
This bill, if it merely requires honest disclosure of ticket quantities and prices to prevent fraud, may be permissible under the Commerce Clause as a regulation of interstate commerce. However, if it extends to intrastate sales or imposes burdensome mandates on small sellers, it would violate the Tenth Amendment by exceeding the enumerated powers of Congress. The condition is that the bill must be strictly limited to interstate transactions and avoid any commandeering of state authority.
The proposed legislation seeks to regulate commercial transactions in ticket sales, which falls under Congress's power to regulate interstate commerce (Article I, Section 8, Clause 3). However, the Constitution requires that such regulation be necessary and proper for executing that power, and must not infringe upon the rights of the states or the people. The bill's requirement of transparency and prohibition of withholding information may be a valid exercise of commerce power if it addresses deceptive practices that substantially affect interstate commerce. Yet, if the bill extends to purely …
This bill regulates the sale of tickets, which is a form of commerce. Under the Commerce Clause, Congress has the power to regulate commerce among the several states. As established in Gibbons v. Ogden, commerce includes all commercial intercourse, and the power to regulate it is plenary. The bill's requirement for transparency and prohibition on withholding ticket availability to inflate prices is a proper exercise of that power, as it seeks to prevent fraudulent and deceptive practices that burden interstate commerce. The Necessary and Proper Clause further supports this legislation as a mea…
Report an error in this Founders' Verdict
What should pass
“VFA SI Solution”
No solution yet
A sourced SI draft appears here once it passes automated checks (Constitution citation, source verification, independent SI critic). How publication works.
For journalists and bloggers
“Embed this grade”
Free to use with the link back. The badge and card update when the grade changes. Embed terms →