H.R. 9746 explained · 119th Congress · Pending in Congress
Biomass Facility Construction Act
Cosponsors: 1 (0 D, 1 R) · per Congress.gov, 2026-10-08
Introduced: 2026-07-16
Latest action (2026-07-16): Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
What H.R. 9746 does, in plain terms
The Congressional Research Service has not published a summary of H.R. 9746 yet. Its official title: “Biomass Facility Construction Act”.
Constitution Index
“VFA Constitution grade”
Not graded yet
H.R. 9746 has not been graded yet. New measures with an official summary are graded daily under the published rubric.
The Framers
“Founders’ Verdict”
Confidence 0.50
Archived SI output (machine-generated)No editorial review recorded. This historical SI verdict was machine-generated by software and predates the review desk; check it against the official bill text.
Synthesis
The majority of Founders (Hamilton and Marshall) find the bill constitutional under the Taxing and Spending Clause, with Madison conditionally supporting it if narrowly construed to avoid overreach into state police powers, while Jefferson dissents on strict construction grounds.
The Biomass Facility Construction Act, as a measure involving tax incentives for the construction of biomass facilities, falls squarely within Congress's power to lay and collect taxes and provide for the general welfare under Article I, Section 8, Clause 1. The encouragement of domestic energy production is a legitimate object of the general welfare, and the use of tax credits or deductions is a well-established means of exercising this power. The uniformity requirement is satisfied if the tax provisions apply equally throughout the United States. There is no encroachment upon state sovereign…
This bill proposes federal subsidies for the construction of biomass facilities, which is an economic activity not enumerated among the powers granted to Congress in Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution. The Tenth Amendment reserves all powers not delegated to the United States to the States or to the people. Encouraging or directing the construction of such facilities through federal taxation or spending exceeds the limited authority of the general government and intrudes upon the rightful sphere of the States and individual enterprise. The power to promote internal improvements or specif…
The Biomass Facility Construction Act, if it provides tax incentives or direct spending for biomass facilities, must be examined under the limited and enumerated powers of Congress. While Congress possesses the power to tax and spend for the general welfare under Article I, Section 8, Clause 1, this power is not without limits. As I argued in Federalist No. 41, the general welfare clause cannot be interpreted as an independent grant of authority to pursue any objective; it must be tied to the enumerated powers. Moreover, the Tenth Amendment reserves to the states those powers not delegated to …
The Biomass Facility Construction Act, as a measure proposing tax incentives or subsidies for the construction of biomass facilities, falls within the constitutional authority of Congress under the Taxing and Spending Clause. The Constitution vests Congress with the power to lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts, and excises, to pay the debts and provide for the common defense and general welfare of the United States. This power is not limited to the direct collection of revenue but extends to the promotion of the general welfare through conditional spending or tax credits, as implied by the …
Report an error in this Founders' Verdict
What should pass
“VFA SI Solution”
No solution yet
A sourced SI draft appears here once it passes automated checks (Constitution citation, source verification, independent SI critic). How publication works.
For journalists and bloggers
“Embed this grade”
Free to use with the link back. The badge and card update when the grade changes. Embed terms →