Real bill currently in Congress  c/o  HR/119/9731

No GRIFT Act of 2026

Latest action (2026-07-16): Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

The Framers

“Founders’ Verdict”

CONSTITUTIONAL

Confidence 1.00

Synthesis

The bill is constitutional under the Spending Clause (Article I, Section 8, Clause 1) and the Necessary and Proper Clause (Article I, Section 8, Clause 18). Congress may attach reasonable conditions to federal grants to ensure prudent use of public funds, and the condition here—limiting compensation of nonprofit officers to the Attorney General's salary—is a valid exercise of the spending power, not coercive or unrelated to the federal interest. The condition does not violate any constitutional prohibition and leaves nonprofits free to decline the grant.

Hamilton YES

The proposed bill is a valid exercise of Congress's power under the Spending Clause, which authorizes the legislature to condition the receipt of federal funds upon compliance with reasonable requirements. The condition here—that a nonprofit receiving a majority of its revenue from Department of Justice grants must not compensate any officer or employee in excess of the Attorney General's salary—is clearly related to the federal interest in the prudent and efficient use of public monies. Such conditions do not violate any constitutional prohibition; they merely set terms for voluntary particip…

Article I, Section 8, Clause 1 Article I, Section 8, Clause 18 Federalist No. 30 Federalist No. 33
Jefferson YES

Congress possesses the power to lay and collect taxes and to provide for the general welfare, which includes the authority to attach conditions to the expenditure of federal funds. This bill conditions the receipt of Department of Justice grants on a nonprofit organization's compensation structure, a condition clearly related to the efficient and prudent use of taxpayer money. As the federal government is under no obligation to fund any private entity, a nonprofit may choose to forgo the grant rather than comply. However, I would caution that such conditions must not be used as a means to indi…

Article I, Section 8, Clause 1 (General Welfare Clause) Amendment X
Madison YES

The bill is a valid exercise of Congress's power to attach conditions to federal grants under the Spending Clause. The condition that a nonprofit heavily reliant on Department of Justice grants must not compensate its officers beyond the Attorney General's salary is a reasonable measure to ensure that federal funds are used prudently and not diverted to excessive executive pay. This condition is directly related to the federal interest in the proper administration of grants, and it does not exceed the enumerated powers of Congress. The condition does not violate any constitutional prohibition,…

Article I, Section 8, Clause 1 Federalist No. 45
Marshall YES

This bill is a constitutional exercise of Congress's power to appropriate funds and attach conditions to their use. The condition—that a nonprofit receiving more than half its revenue from Department of Justice grants must not compensate any officer or employee in excess of the Attorney General's salary—is a reasonable means to ensure that federal grant funds are not diverted to excessive executive compensation, thereby promoting the efficient administration of justice. The power to spend for the general welfare, as vested in Congress by Article I, Section 8, Clause 1, includes the authority t…

Article I, Section 8, Clause 1 (Spending Clause) Article I, Section 8, Clause 18 (Necessary and Proper Clause) McCulloch v. Maryland (1819)

What should pass

“AI Consensus Solution”

No solution yet

Daily synthesis runs at 06:00 UTC. This bill's consensus draft will appear on the next pass.

← Back to the Republic