H.R. 9731 explained  ·  119th Congress  ·  Pending in Congress

No GRIFT Act of 2026

Create a free account or sign in to follow H.R. 9731 and get alerts. Policy area: Government Operations and Politics Create a free account or sign in to follow the Government Operations and Politics policy area and get alerts. ▲ 95 days since action Sponsor: Andy Biggs, AZ-05, R → Congress.gov

Cosponsors: 2 (0 D, 2 R) · per Congress.gov, 2026-10-08

Introduced: 2026-07-16

Latest action (2026-07-16): Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

What H.R. 9731 does, in plain terms

The Congressional Research Service has not published a summary of H.R. 9731 yet. Its official title: “No GRIFT Act of 2026”.

Constitution Index

“VFA Constitution grade”

Not graded yet

H.R. 9731 has not been graded yet. New measures with an official summary are graded daily under the published rubric.

The Framers

“Founders’ Verdict”

CONSTITUTIONAL

Confidence 1.00

Archived SI output (machine-generated)

No editorial review recorded. This historical SI verdict was machine-generated by software and predates the review desk; check it against the official bill text.

Synthesis

The bill is constitutional under the Spending Clause (Article I, Section 8, Clause 1) and the Necessary and Proper Clause (Article I, Section 8, Clause 18). Congress may attach reasonable conditions to federal grants to ensure prudent use of public funds, and the condition here—limiting compensation of nonprofit officers to the Attorney General's salary—is a valid exercise of the spending power, not coercive or unrelated to the federal interest. The condition does not violate any constitutional prohibition and leaves nonprofits free to decline the grant.

Hamilton YES

The proposed bill is a valid exercise of Congress's power under the Spending Clause, which authorizes the legislature to condition the receipt of federal funds upon compliance with reasonable requirements. The condition here—that a nonprofit receiving a majority of its revenue from Department of Justice grants must not compensate any officer or employee in excess of the Attorney General's salary—is clearly related to the federal interest in the prudent and efficient use of public monies. Such conditions do not violate any constitutional prohibition; they merely set terms for voluntary particip…

Article I, Section 8, Clause 1 Article I, Section 8, Clause 18 Federalist No. 30 Federalist No. 33
Jefferson YES

Congress possesses the power to lay and collect taxes and to provide for the general welfare, which includes the authority to attach conditions to the expenditure of federal funds. This bill conditions the receipt of Department of Justice grants on a nonprofit organization's compensation structure, a condition clearly related to the efficient and prudent use of taxpayer money. As the federal government is under no obligation to fund any private entity, a nonprofit may choose to forgo the grant rather than comply. However, I would caution that such conditions must not be used as a means to indi…

Article I, Section 8, Clause 1 (General Welfare Clause) Amendment X
Madison YES

The bill is a valid exercise of Congress's power to attach conditions to federal grants under the Spending Clause. The condition that a nonprofit heavily reliant on Department of Justice grants must not compensate its officers beyond the Attorney General's salary is a reasonable measure to ensure that federal funds are used prudently and not diverted to excessive executive pay. This condition is directly related to the federal interest in the proper administration of grants, and it does not exceed the enumerated powers of Congress. The condition does not violate any constitutional prohibition,…

Article I, Section 8, Clause 1 Federalist No. 45
Marshall YES

This bill is a constitutional exercise of Congress's power to appropriate funds and attach conditions to their use. The condition—that a nonprofit receiving more than half its revenue from Department of Justice grants must not compensate any officer or employee in excess of the Attorney General's salary—is a reasonable means to ensure that federal grant funds are not diverted to excessive executive compensation, thereby promoting the efficient administration of justice. The power to spend for the general welfare, as vested in Congress by Article I, Section 8, Clause 1, includes the authority t…

Article I, Section 8, Clause 1 (Spending Clause) Article I, Section 8, Clause 18 (Necessary and Proper Clause) McCulloch v. Maryland (1819)
Report an error in this Founders' Verdict
No account needed. Or email hello@valuesforamerica.com. How reports are handled.

What should pass

“VFA SI Solution”

No solution yet

A sourced SI draft appears here once it passes automated checks (Constitution citation, source verification, independent SI critic). How publication works.

Share card

1200×675 PNG for X, Threads, LinkedIn and messages. Free to share with a link back to this page.

For journalists and bloggers

“Embed this grade”

Free to use with the link back. The badge and card update when the grade changes. Embed terms →

VFA Constitution grade for H.R. 9731

← Back to the Republic