Real bill currently in Congress  c/o  HR/119/9646

Quantum-Enhanced Critical Minerals Mapping Act of 2026

Policy area: Energy ▲ 7 days since action Sponsor: Jeff Hurd, CO-03, R → Congress.gov

Latest action (2026-07-14): Referred to the Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources.

The Framers

“Founders’ Verdict”

UNCONSTITUTIONAL

Confidence 0.50

Synthesis

The bill exceeds the enumerated powers of Congress, as there is no express authorization for a federal scientific mapping program of this scope. The General Welfare and Necessary and Proper Clauses cannot be used to create new powers, and the Tenth Amendment reserves such matters to the states. The Commerce and Property Clauses do not provide a sufficient nexus in the absence of a direct link to interstate commerce or federal lands.

Hamilton YES

The Constitution grants Congress the power to regulate commerce among the several states (Article I, Section 8, Clause 3) and to dispose of and make all needful rules respecting the territory or other property belonging to the United States (Article IV, Section 3, Clause 2). The mapping of critical minerals directly supports the regulation of interstate commerce in minerals and the management of federal lands. Additionally, the Necessary and Proper Clause (Article I, Section 8, Clause 18) authorizes Congress to enact laws appropriate to carry out its enumerated powers. As argued in Federalist …

Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 Article IV, Section 3, Clause 2 Federalist No. 23
Jefferson NO

This bill proposes federal expenditure for quantum-enhanced mapping of critical minerals, which exceeds the enumerated powers delegated to Congress in the Constitution. The Tenth Amendment reserves to the states or the people all powers not expressly granted to the federal government. Nowhere in Article I, Section 8 is there authority for the general surveying or mapping of minerals, nor does the General Welfare Clause permit such an expansive reading—James Madison and I have long held that clause is limited to the enumerated powers. Furthermore, the Ninth Amendment cautions that the enumerati…

Amendment X Amendment IX Article I, Section 8
Madison NO

This bill, the Quantum-Enhanced Critical Minerals Mapping Act of 2026, proposes a federal program for mapping minerals using advanced technology. The Constitution grants Congress only enumerated powers, and I find no express authorization for such a broad scientific mapping enterprise. The power to 'provide for the general Welfare' (Art. I, Sec. 8, Cl. 1) is not a general grant of legislative authority; it must be exercised in conjunction with the enumerated objects. Similarly, the Necessary and Proper Clause (Art. I, Sec. 8, Cl. 18) cannot be used to invent new powers. In Federalist No. 45, I…

Article I, Section 8, Clause 1 (General Welfare) Article I, Section 8, Clause 18 (Necessary and Proper) Federalist No. 45 Federalist No. 41
Marshall YES

The Quantum-Enhanced Critical Minerals Mapping Act of 2026 is a constitutional exercise of the legislative power vested in Congress. The mapping of critical minerals bears a clear and substantial relation to the regulation of commerce among the several states, as such minerals are essential to industries and supply chains that cross state lines. Moreover, the Act falls within the power of Congress to dispose of and make all needful rules respecting the territory or property of the United States, for critical minerals located on federal lands are a national asset. The means chosen—quantum-enhan…

Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 (Commerce Clause) Article IV, Section 3, Clause 2 (Property Clause) McCulloch v. Maryland, 17 U.S. 316 (1819) Gibbons v. Ogden, 22 U.S. 1 (1824)

What should pass

“AI Consensus Solution”

Read full document →

Cooperative Critical Minerals Quantum Mapping Act of 2026

To accelerate the domestic discovery and mapping of critical mineral deposits using quantum-enhanced sensing and computing technologies, thereby reducing reliance on foreign supply chains.

Bipartisan rationale: Honors Democratic priorities: federal investment in technology and climate/mineral security, protection of private property rights, and transparency via GAO oversight. Honors Republican priorities: voluntary state-federal partnership (no federal mandate), reliance on private sector easements and compensation, sunset clause to limit federal expansion, and a user-fee funding model that does not increase general taxation.

Funding: Excise tax of 0.5% on gross value of criti $200 million cap over five fis Sunset 5y Oversight: Government Accountability Offi Enforcement: Civil penalties for unauthorized map

Vote-count path: House: ~240 votes (150 Democrats + 90 Republicans), Senate: ~60 votes (35 Democrats + 25 Republicans) – centrists and federalism-minded members from both parties support the state-consent model and funding self-sufficiency.

→ Article I, Section 8, Clause 1 (General Welfare – spending for national mineral security) → Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 (Commerce Clause – minerals in interstate commerce) → Tenth Amendment (reserving mapping on non-federal lands to states unless they consent) → Fourth Amendment (protection against unreasonable searches – passive sensing from public airspace only) → Fifth Amendment Takings Clause (requires easement or compensation for private property access)

← Back to the Republic