H.R. 9319 explained  ·  119th Congress  ·  Pending in Congress

Keeping Pets and Families Together Act

Create a free account or sign in to follow H.R. 9319 and get alerts. Policy area: Animals Create a free account or sign in to follow the Animals policy area and get alerts. ▲ 126 days since action Sponsor: Ted Lieu, CA-36, D → Congress.gov

Cosponsors: 2 (2 D, 0 R) · per Congress.gov, 2026-10-14

Introduced: 2026-06-15

Latest action (2026-06-15): Referred to the House Committee on Agriculture.

What H.R. 9319 does, in plain terms

The Congressional Research Service has not published a summary of H.R. 9319 yet. Its official title: “Keeping Pets and Families Together Act”.

Constitution Index

“VFA Constitution grade”

Not graded yet

H.R. 9319 has not been graded yet. New measures with an official summary are graded daily under the published rubric.

The Framers

“Founders’ Verdict”

CONDITIONAL

Confidence 0.75

Archived SI output (machine-generated)

No editorial review recorded. This historical SI verdict was machine-generated by software and predates the review desk; check it against the official bill text.

Synthesis

The bill is conditionally constitutional, with the decisive condition being that the federal cooperative agreements remain voluntary, do not coerce or commandeer state resources, and maintain a clear jurisdictional nexus to interstate commerce. Hamilton and Marshall support broad constitutionality under the Commerce Clause and Necessary and Proper Clause, provided the scope is not exceeded. Madison approves only if the bill strictly adheres to enumerated powers and voluntary cooperation. Jefferson dissents, arguing the bill exceeds federal authority under the Tenth Amendment and may implicate the Fourth Amendment.

Hamilton YES

This bill operates within the commerce power and the general welfare clause. The regulation of animal shelters and pet microchipping falls under Congress's authority to regulate interstate commerce in animals and pet-related products (Article I, Section 8, Clause 3). Additionally, cooperative agreements with states (entered into by the Secretary of Agriculture) align with the cooperative federalism principles permitted under the Supremacy Clause (Article VI, Clause 2) and do not exceed the enumerated powers. Federalist No. 23 supports the necessity of federal authority to execute such measures…

Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 Article VI, Clause 2
Jefferson NO

This bill proposes to extend federal authority into a matter of local police power—the regulation of animal shelters and the microchipping of domestic pets. The Tenth Amendment reserves to the states and the people all powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution. The Animal Welfare Act, while intended to prevent cruelty in interstate commerce, should not be stretched to encompass cooperative agreements for microchipping that do not directly involve interstate commerce or federal property. Such a measure would set a dangerous precedent of federal superintendence over purely in…

Amendment X Amendment IV
Madison CONDITIONAL

This bill proposes federal cooperative agreements for microchipping dogs and cats in shelters. The Animal Welfare Act is an exercise of Congress's power under the Commerce Clause, as animal shelters and the sale of pets affect interstate commerce. However, the Constitution limits federal power to enumerated ends. If the Secretary's agreements involve only voluntary state or local participation and do not commandeer state resources, they may be permissible. But if the bill coerces states or preempts their police powers without clear connection to interstate commerce, it would exceed federal aut…

Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 Federalist No. 45
Marshall YES

The federal regulation of interstate commerce, as established in Gibbons v. Ogden (1824), extends to all activity that concerns more than one state. The microchipping of dogs and cats in shelters supports the tracing of animals across state lines, thereby affecting interstate commerce. Additionally, the Necessary and Proper Clause (Article I, Section 8, Clause 18) grants Congress the authority to make laws that are appropriate to carry out its enumerated powers. This cooperative agreement with state and local authorities is a suitable means to effectuate the regulation of interstate animal mov…

Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 (Commerce Clause) Art. I, Sec. 8, Cl. 18 (Necessary and Proper Clause) Gibbons v. Ogden (1824)
Report an error in this Founders' Verdict
No account needed. Or email hello@valuesforamerica.com. How reports are handled.

What should pass

“VFA SI Solution”

Read full document →

Archived SI output (machine-generated) · No editorial review recorded

This historical draft has no editorial review time on record. Check its claims against the original bill and current law.

Pet Reunification Microchip Grant Act of 2025

Generated by VFA SI Solutions

To increase the rate of microchipping for dogs and cats in animal shelters and similar establishments so that lost pets can be more easily reunited with their owners.

Bipartisan rationale: Honors Democratic priorities: promotes animal welfare, reunites pets with families, and provides federal support for local shelters. Honors Republican priorities: limits federal role to voluntary grants with matching requirements, includes a sunset, avoids new mandates on states or shelters, and offsets spending to reduce the deficit.

Funding: Offset by reducing unobligated balances in $50 million per year for five Sunset 5y Oversight: Office of Inspector General of Enforcement: Grant recipients must comply with pr
→ Article I, Section 8, Clause 1 (Spending Power – general welfare) → Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 (Commerce Clause – limited to voluntary grants, not regulation of intrastate activity) → Tenth Amendment (preserves state and local discretion; no commandeering)

Article I, Section 8, Clause 1 Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 Amendment X

Brief for congressional offices →

Report an error in this Solution
No account needed. Or email hello@valuesforamerica.com. How reports are handled.

Citizen Consensus

“Do you support this VFA SI Solution?”

One vote per verified account; you can change it any time. Only verified accounts count, results publish once 30 verified people have voted, and state and district results count only people who attested a home ZIP code. How this works.

Email verification is not switched on yet, so no vote counts toward results yet. Votes cast now are saved and count once the voter verifies their email address.

Add a short reason (optional)

/280 · no links or contact details · reasons are reviewed before anyone sees them, and many never are shown.

Your vote is saved but held out of published results by an automated integrity check (for example, several accounts voting from one browser).

Your vote is saved. It will count once you verify your email address. Verify on your account page.

Your vote counts nationally. Add your home ZIP code to count in your state and district too.

Your vote counts nationally and in .

Reason saved privately; it is shown only if it passes review.

A sudden surge of votes on this item was flagged and is under review; votes from new accounts in that surge are held out until it is resolved.

National, state and district results →

Share card

1200×675 PNG for X, Threads, LinkedIn and messages. Free to share with a link back to this page.

For journalists and bloggers

“Embed this grade”

Free to use with the link back. The badge and card update when the grade changes. Embed terms →

VFA Constitution grade for H.R. 9319

← Back to the Republic