Real bill currently in Congress  c/o  HR/119/9315

Workforce Dignity Act

Policy area: Social Welfare ▲ 36 days since action Sponsor: Glenn Grothman, WI-06, R → Congress.gov

Latest action (2026-06-15): Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committees on Small Business, and Transportation and Infrastructure, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

The Framers

“Founders’ Verdict”

CONDITIONAL

Confidence 0.55

Synthesis

While 2 voices (Hamilton and Marshall) find the bill clearly constitutional as a routine terminology update within Congress's legislative power, the deciding opinion from Madison conditions constitutionality on whether the term change remains purely semantic and does not substantively alter federal authority. Jefferson's dissent argues the underlying programs lack constitutional authorization. Thus, the conditional verdict is based on the requirement that the bill must not expand federal power or impose new substantive obligations beyond existing statutory scope.

Hamilton YES

The bill merely updates statutory terminology from 'sheltered workshop' to 'community rehabilitation program' across several federal statutes. This is a routine exercise of Congress's power to define terms used in laws it has enacted, and does not alter any substantive rights, obligations, or the distribution of federal power. Under Article I, Section 8, Clause 18, Congress has the authority to make all laws necessary and proper for executing its enumerated powers, which includes clarifying and modernizing the language of existing statutes. The change does not violate any constitutional prohib…

Article I, Section 8, Clause 18 Tenth Amendment Federalist No. 33
Jefferson NO

This bill seeks merely to rename a term in several federal statutes. While the change may appear innocuous, the underlying programs—sheltered workshops—are federal interventions into the private economy and the lives of citizens. The Constitution grants Congress only enumerated powers; no provision authorizes the federal government to establish or regulate such workshops. The Tenth Amendment reserves to the states and the people all powers not delegated. Moreover, the First Amendment protects the freedom of individuals and private associations to organize their own labor and charitable activit…

Amendment X Amendment I
Madison CONDITIONAL

The proposed bill seeks to amend several federal statutes to substitute the term 'sheltered workshop' with 'community rehabilitation program'. Under Article I, Section 8, Congress possesses enumerated powers, including the power to regulate commerce and to provide for the general welfare. However, the Tenth Amendment reserves to the states all powers not delegated to the United States. The replacement of terminology in statutes such as the Social Security Act touches on areas of state administration and private employment, where federal definitions may impinge on state authority if they exceed…

Article I, Section 8, Clauses 1 and 18 Tenth Amendment Federalist No. 45
Marshall YES

This bill merely substitutes one statutory term for another across several federal acts. Such an alteration does not exceed the legislative authority vested in Congress by the Constitution. The power to amend statutes is inherent in the legislative power granted by Article I, and the means chosen—a simple nomenclature change—is plainly adapted to the legitimate ends of clarifying and updating federal law. As held in McCulloch v. Maryland, where the end is legitimate and within the scope of the Constitution, all appropriate means not prohibited are constitutional. No provision of the Constituti…

Article I, Section 8, Clause 18 (Necessary and Proper Clause) McCulloch v. Maryland (1819)

What should pass

“AI Consensus Solution”

No solution yet

Daily synthesis runs at 06:00 UTC. This bill's consensus draft will appear on the next pass.

← Back to the Republic