H.R. 9311 explained  ·  119th Congress  ·  Pending in Congress

Build Housing Affordably Act

Create a free account or sign in to follow H.R. 9311 and get alerts. Policy area: Housing and Community Development Create a free account or sign in to follow the Housing and Community Development policy area and get alerts. ▲ 126 days since action Sponsor: Mike Flood, NE-01, R → Congress.gov

Cosponsors: 3 (2 D, 1 R) · per Congress.gov, 2026-10-14

Introduced: 2026-06-15

Latest action (2026-06-15): Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.

What H.R. 9311 does, in plain terms

The Congressional Research Service has not published a summary of H.R. 9311 yet. Its official title: “Build Housing Affordably Act”.

Constitution Index

“VFA Constitution grade”

Not graded yet

H.R. 9311 has not been graded yet. New measures with an official summary are graded daily under the published rubric.

The Framers

“Founders’ Verdict”

CONDITIONAL

Confidence 0.85

Archived SI output (machine-generated)

No editorial review recorded. This historical SI verdict was machine-generated by software and predates the review desk; check it against the official bill text.

Synthesis

The bill is constitutional only if it includes objective, non-arbitrary criteria defining the exempted 'covered projects' and the projects fall within a legitimate federal power (e.g., interstate commerce, national defense). Without such limitations, the bill risks violating due process (Fifth Amendment), exceeding enumerated powers, or infringing on state sovereignty (Tenth Amendment).

Hamilton CONDITIONAL

The Congress possesses broad authority under Article I, Section 8, Clause 18 to make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution its enumerated powers, including the power to regulate federal contracting. Exempting certain projects from the contract disputes procedures of chapter 83 of title 41 is a legislative classification that, in principle, falls within that authority. However, the Constitution's Fifth Amendment guarantee of due process requires that any such exemption not be arbitrary or capricious, nor deny contractors equal protection of the laws. Without c…

Article I, Section 8, Clause 18 Fifth Amendment Due Process Clause Federalist No. 33
Jefferson CONDITIONAL

This bill purports to exempt certain projects from federal procurement requirements. While the federal government may regulate its own contracting under Article I, Section 8, the Tenth Amendment reserves all powers not delegated to the United States to the States or the people. If the 'covered projects' are purely intrastate or otherwise outside the enumerated powers of Congress, then any federal requirement—or exemption from such requirement—would be an improper assumption of authority. The bill's constitutionality thus hinges on whether the projects fall within a legitimate federal power, su…

Amendment X Article I, Section 8, Clause 18
Madison CONDITIONAL

The proposed exemption from procurement requirements under Title 41 must be examined against the constitutional principle that Congress may not delegate its legislative power without clear standards, nor may it exempt projects from general laws without a specific enumerated power. Under Article I, Section 8, Congress has the power to regulate commerce and to make all laws necessary and proper for executing its enumerated powers. However, the Constitution requires that laws operate uniformly and not create arbitrary privileges, as factional favoritism would undermine the public good (Federalist…

Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 (Commerce Clause) Article I, Section 8, Clause 18 (Necessary and Proper Clause) Federalist No. 10 Federalist No. 45
Marshall YES

The Constitution vests in Congress the power to regulate commerce among the several states and to make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution its enumerated powers. The regulation of federal contracts falls squarely within the commerce power, and the decision to exempt certain projects from statutory requirements is a permissible exercise of legislative discretion. As established in McCulloch v. Maryland, Congress may choose the means by which it executes its powers, and such choices are entitled to great deference. No constitutional provision prohibits Congre…

Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 (Commerce Clause) Article I, Section 8, Clause 18 (Necessary and Proper Clause) McCulloch v. Maryland (1819)
Report an error in this Founders' Verdict
No account needed. Or email hello@valuesforamerica.com. How reports are handled.

What should pass

“VFA SI Solution”

Read full document →

Archived SI output (machine-generated) · No editorial review recorded

This historical draft has no editorial review time on record. Check its claims against the original bill and current law.

Federal Project Procurement Streamlining Act of 2025

Generated by VFA SI Solutions

To allow certain federal projects to bypass standard procurement requirements in order to accelerate their completion, particularly for infrastructure, defense, or emergency response.

Bipartisan rationale: Democratic priorities honored: includes labor protections, anti-discrimination clauses, whistleblower safeguards, and GAO oversight to prevent abuse. Republican priorities honored: reduces bureaucratic delays for critical projects, limits exemption to federal funds, includes a sunset to prevent permanent expansion, and respects state sovereignty by not preempting state law.

Funding: General fund of the Treasury; no new appro Not applicable; the Act does n Sunset 5y Oversight: Government Accountability Offi Enforcement: Any contract awarded in violation of
→ Article I, Section 8, Clause 1 (general welfare) → Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 (interstate commerce) → Article I, Section 8, Clause 12 (armies) → Article I, Section 8, Clause 18 (necessary and proper) → Fifth Amendment (due process – clear criteria prevent arbitrary deprivation) → Tenth Amendment (reserves to states powers not delegated)

Article I, Section 8, Clause 1 Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 Article I, Section 8, Clause 12 Article I, Section 8, Clause 18 Amendment V Amendment X

Brief for congressional offices →

Report an error in this Solution
No account needed. Or email hello@valuesforamerica.com. How reports are handled.

Citizen Consensus

“Do you support this VFA SI Solution?”

One vote per verified account; you can change it any time. Only verified accounts count, results publish once 30 verified people have voted, and state and district results count only people who attested a home ZIP code. How this works.

Email verification is not switched on yet, so no vote counts toward results yet. Votes cast now are saved and count once the voter verifies their email address.

Add a short reason (optional)

/280 · no links or contact details · reasons are reviewed before anyone sees them, and many never are shown.

Your vote is saved but held out of published results by an automated integrity check (for example, several accounts voting from one browser).

Your vote is saved. It will count once you verify your email address. Verify on your account page.

Your vote counts nationally. Add your home ZIP code to count in your state and district too.

Your vote counts nationally and in .

Reason saved privately; it is shown only if it passes review.

A sudden surge of votes on this item was flagged and is under review; votes from new accounts in that surge are held out until it is resolved.

National, state and district results →

Share card

1200×675 PNG for X, Threads, LinkedIn and messages. Free to share with a link back to this page.

For journalists and bloggers

“Embed this grade”

Free to use with the link back. The badge and card update when the grade changes. Embed terms →

VFA Constitution grade for H.R. 9311

← Back to the Republic