H.R. 9225 explained  ·  119th Congress  ·  Pending in Congress

To require the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration to conduct a study to assess whether certain aircraft certified under part 23 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations, may be used in operations conducted under part 121 of such title, and for other purposes.

Create a free account or sign in to follow H.R. 9225 and get alerts. Policy area: Transportation and Public Works Create a free account or sign in to follow the Transportation and Public Works policy area and get alerts. ▲ 132 days since action Sponsor: Tracey Mann, KS-01, R → Congress.gov

Cosponsors: 2 (1 D, 1 R) · per Congress.gov, 2026-10-08

Introduced: 2026-06-09

Latest action (2026-06-09): Referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.

What H.R. 9225 does, in plain terms

The Congressional Research Service has not published a summary of H.R. 9225 yet. Its official title: “To require the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration to conduct a study to assess whether certain aircraft certified under part 23 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations, may be used in operations conducted under part 121 of such title, and for other purposes.”.

Constitution Index

“VFA Constitution grade”

Not graded yet

H.R. 9225 has not been graded yet. New measures with an official summary are graded daily under the published rubric.

The Framers

“Founders’ Verdict”

CONDITIONAL

Confidence 0.75

Archived SI output (machine-generated)

No editorial review recorded. This historical SI verdict was machine-generated by software and predates the review desk; check it against the official bill text.

Synthesis

The bill, which directs a study on aircraft certification and operations, is permissible as an exercise of Congress's commerce power under Article I, Section 8, Clause 3, and the Necessary and Proper Clause under Article I, Section 8, Clause 18, provided that the study remains purely informational and does not lead to binding regulations that infringe upon state powers or individual liberties as protected by the Tenth and Ninth Amendments.

Hamilton YES

The bill directs the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration to conduct a study on aircraft certification and operations, which falls squarely within the federal power to regulate interstate and foreign commerce under Article I, Section 8, Clause 3. Additionally, the Necessary and Proper Clause (Article I, Section 8, Clause 18) authorizes Congress to enact laws that are necessary to execute its enumerated powers, and this study is a proper means of informing future regulation of air commerce. As argued in Federalist No. 23, the federal government must have the means to execute its…

Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 Article I, Section 8, Clause 18 Federalist No. 23
Jefferson CONDITIONAL

The Constitution grants Congress the power to regulate interstate commerce, including aviation safety, under Article I, Section 8, Clause 3. However, the Tenth Amendment reserves to the states and the people all powers not expressly delegated to the federal government. A mere study, without coercive regulation, may fall within federal authority if it is necessary and proper to execute a delegated power. Yet, if the study leads to mandates that infringe upon the rights of aircraft owners or operators without clear constitutional warrant, it would be an overreach. I would condition approval on t…

Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 Amendment X
Madison YES

This proposed action merely directs a study by an executive agency (the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration) within the scope of its delegated authority. The Constitution grants Congress the power to regulate commerce with foreign nations and among the several states (Article I, Section 8, Clause 3), which encompasses aviation safety and operational rules. The requirement of a study is a permissible exercise of Congress's investigative and informing function, and does not exceed any enumerated power. No interference with state powers or individual rights is evident. Federalist…

Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 (Commerce Clause) Federalist No. 45 (Madison)
Marshall YES

This bill proposes a study by the Federal Aviation Administration, an executive agency, to assess aircraft certification standards. The Constitution vests in Congress the power to regulate commerce among the several states (Article I, Section 8, Clause 3), and the power to make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the foregoing powers (Article I, Section 8, Clause 18). The regulation of aviation, as a form of interstate commerce, falls squarely within this authority. The bill does not command any unconstitutional action; it merely directs an executive office…

Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 (Commerce Clause) Article I, Section 8, Clause 18 (Necessary and Proper Clause)
Report an error in this Founders' Verdict
No account needed. Or email hello@valuesforamerica.com. How reports are handled.

What should pass

“VFA SI Solution”

No solution yet

A sourced SI draft appears here once it passes automated checks (Constitution citation, source verification, independent SI critic). How publication works.

Share card

1200×675 PNG for X, Threads, LinkedIn and messages. Free to share with a link back to this page.

For journalists and bloggers

“Embed this grade”

Free to use with the link back. The badge and card update when the grade changes. Embed terms →

VFA Constitution grade for H.R. 9225

← Back to the Republic