H.R. 9215 explained · 119th Congress · Pending in Congress
Prioritizing Warfighters in Defense Contracting Act
Cosponsors: none · per Congress.gov, 2026-10-14
Introduced: 2026-06-09
Latest action (2026-06-09): Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.
What H.R. 9215 does, in plain terms
The Congressional Research Service has not published a summary of H.R. 9215 yet. Its official title: “Prioritizing Warfighters in Defense Contracting Act”.
Constitution Index
“VFA Constitution grade”
Not graded yet
H.R. 9215 has not been graded yet. New measures with an official summary are graded daily under the published rubric.
The Framers
“Founders’ Verdict”
Confidence 0.50
Archived SI output (machine-generated)No editorial review recorded. This historical SI verdict was machine-generated by software and predates the review desk; check it against the official bill text.
Synthesis
The bill is constitutional only if the conditions on stock buybacks, dividends, and executive compensation are narrowly tailored to the efficient execution of federal defense contracts, and if the determination of 'underperforming' is based on objective, contract-related criteria specified in the law, not left to the Secretary's unguided discretion. This ensures the law respects enumerated powers, the Tenth Amendment, and due process.
This bill delegates to the Secretary of Definine the authority to determine which contractors are 'underperforming' and imposes financial restrictions based on that determination. Such delegation of legislative power to an executive officer, without clear and specific standards fixed by Congress, violates the principle of separation of powers. Furthermore, the bill interferes with private contracts and corporate governance beyond any enumerated power of Congress; neither the power to raise armies nor the general welfare clause (Article I, Section 8, Clauses 1, 12–14) extends to regulating inte…
This bill exceeds the enumerated powers of Congress by directing the Secretary of Defense to impose conditions on private corporate conduct—stock buybacks, dividends, and executive compensation—that are not necessary and proper to any specific power delegated to the federal government. The Constitution grants Congress authority over the military (Article I, Section 8, Clause 12) but does not authorize the regulation of internal corporate financial policies of contractors, especially when such regulation is based on subjective determinations of 'underperformance.' The Tenth Amendment reserves t…
The bill proposes to condition federal contracts on restrictions regarding stock buybacks, dividends, and executive compensation. Under the enumerated powers of Congress, the power to raise and support Armies (Article I, Section 8, Clause 12) and to provide for the common Defense (Article I, Section 8, Clause 1) include the authority to set terms for federal contracts. However, the Tenth Amendment reserves to the States or to the people powers not delegated to the United States. Regulation of internal corporate governance, such as stock buybacks and dividends, falls primarily within the police…
This bill, if enacted, would condition a contractor's ability to issue stock buybacks, dividends, and certain executive compensation upon a determination by the Secretary of Defense that the contractor is 'underperforming.' The Constitution vests in Congress the power to raise and support Armies, to provide and maintain a Navy, and to make rules for the government and regulation of the land and naval forces, as well as to make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution these powers (Article I, Section 8, Clauses 12–14 and 18). Under McCulloch v. Maryland, Congress…
Report an error in this Founders' Verdict
What should pass
“VFA SI Solution”
Archived SI output (machine-generated) · No editorial review recorded
This historical draft has no editorial review time on record. Check its claims against the original bill and current law.
Defense Contractor Performance Incentive and Oversight Act of 2025
Generated by VFA SI Solutions
Prevent defense contractors who perform poorly on federal contracts from enriching executives and shareholders at taxpayer expense, thereby improving contract performance and return on defense spending.
Bipartisan rationale: Democratic priorities honored: curbing excessive executive pay and shareholder enrichment at taxpayer expense; tying corporate behavior to public contract performance. Republican priorities honored: preserving free-market contracting principles by using contract-specific remedies rather than general corporate mandates; respecting due process with clear breach standards and appeal rights; limiting government overreach with a sunset provision; funding from existing accounts without new taxes.
Article I, Section 8, Clause 12 Article I, Section 8, Clause 13 Amendment V Amendment X
Report an error in this Solution
Citizen Consensus
“Do you support this VFA SI Solution?”
One vote per verified account; you can change it any time. Only verified accounts count, results publish once 30 verified people have voted, and state and district results count only people who attested a home ZIP code. How this works.
Email verification is not switched on yet, so no vote counts toward results yet. Votes cast now are saved and count once the voter verifies their email address.
Sign in or create a free account to vote.
Add a short reason (optional)
/280 · no links or contact details · reasons are reviewed before anyone sees them, and many never are shown.
Your vote is saved but held out of published results by an automated integrity check (for example, several accounts voting from one browser).
Your vote is saved. It will count once you verify your email address. Verify on your account page.
Your vote counts nationally. Add your home ZIP code to count in your state and district too.
Your vote counts nationally and in .
Reason saved privately; it is shown only if it passes review.
Verified participants nationwide · n =
Self-selected participants, not a random sample; ± is the 95% sampling margin.
Not enough verified votes yet. Results publish at verified votes.
A sudden surge of votes on this item was flagged and is under review; votes from new accounts in that surge are held out until it is resolved.
For journalists and bloggers
“Embed this grade”
Free to use with the link back. The badge and card update when the grade changes. Embed terms →