H.R. 9144 explained  ·  119th Congress  ·  Pending in Congress

Closing the Digital Divide for Students Act of 2026

Create a free account or sign in to follow H.R. 9144 and get alerts. Policy area: Housing and Community Development Create a free account or sign in to follow the Housing and Community Development policy area and get alerts. ▲ 138 days since action Sponsor: Bill Foster, IL-11, D → Congress.gov

Cosponsors: 6 (6 D, 0 R) · per Congress.gov, 2026-10-08

Introduced: 2026-06-04

Latest action (2026-06-04): Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.

What H.R. 9144 does, in plain terms

The Congressional Research Service has not published a summary of H.R. 9144 yet. Its official title: “Closing the Digital Divide for Students Act of 2026”.

Constitution Index

“VFA Constitution grade”

Not graded yet

H.R. 9144 has not been graded yet. New measures with an official summary are graded daily under the published rubric.

The Framers

“Founders’ Verdict”

CONDITIONAL

Confidence 0.75

Archived SI output (machine-generated)

No editorial review recorded. This historical SI verdict was machine-generated by software and predates the review desk; check it against the official bill text.

Synthesis

The majority of founders (Hamilton, Marshall, and Madison conditionally) support the bill as a constitutional exercise of Congress's spending power, provided the relation to enumerated powers is clear and state autonomy is respected. Hamilton and Marshall find it clearly constitutional. Madison conditionally supports it if a nexus to enumerated powers like commerce or postal service is shown. Jefferson dissents alone.

Hamilton YES

The proposed legislation falls within the constitutional authority of Congress to provide for the general welfare under Article I, Section 8, Clause 1. The inclusion of high-speed internet costs in utility allowances for public housing is a reasonable extension of the federal government's established role in housing assistance, as it addresses a modern necessity for economic opportunity and social well-being. The Necessary and Proper Clause (Article I, Section 8, Clause 18) further supports this measure as a means to execute the enumerated power of spending for the general welfare. As argued i…

Article I, Section 8, Clause 1 Article I, Section 8, Clause 18 Federalist No. 30
Jefferson NO

The Constitution grants Congress only enumerated powers, and there is no provision authorizing the federal government to regulate housing utilities or define the scope of utility allowances for public housing. The Tenth Amendment reserves all powers not delegated to the United States to the States or to the people. This bill intrudes upon state and local authority over housing and utility matters, and does not fall within any legitimate federal power such as interstate commerce or general welfare (which must be tied to an enumerated power). Furthermore, the Bill of Rights, particularly the Nin…

Tenth Amendment Article I, Section 8
Madison CONDITIONAL

The proposed bill seeks to include high-speed internet costs in utility allowances for public housing residents. Under the Constitution, Congress may provide for the general welfare through spending, but only for purposes enumerated in Article I, Section 8. Housing and utility allowances for the poor may fall under the power to provide for the general welfare, but the connection to an enumerated power—such as interstate commerce or the postal service—must be clear. High-speed internet, while important, is not a traditional utility like water or electricity, and its inclusion may stretch the sp…

Article I, Section 8, Clause 1 (Spending for General Welfare) Tenth Amendment Federalist No. 45 (Madison on limited federal powers)
Marshall YES

This bill is a proper exercise of Congress's power under the Spending Clause and the Necessary and Proper Clause. The Constitution grants Congress the authority to provide for the general welfare through appropriations, and the regulation of public housing falls within the commerce power as it affects interstate commerce and the national economy. Including internet costs in utility allowances is a reasonable means to achieve the legitimate end of ensuring safe and habitable housing, as internet access has become essential for education, employment, and commerce. This does not exceed the enumer…

Article I, Section 8, Clause 1 (Spending Clause) McCulloch v. Maryland (1819)
Report an error in this Founders' Verdict
No account needed. Or email hello@valuesforamerica.com. How reports are handled.

What should pass

“VFA SI Solution”

No solution yet

A sourced SI draft appears here once it passes automated checks (Constitution citation, source verification, independent SI critic). How publication works.

Share card

1200×675 PNG for X, Threads, LinkedIn and messages. Free to share with a link back to this page.

For journalists and bloggers

“Embed this grade”

Free to use with the link back. The badge and card update when the grade changes. Embed terms →

VFA Constitution grade for H.R. 9144

← Back to the Republic