Real bill currently in Congress c/o HR/119/8775
Ending Predator Access to Union Power Act
Latest action (2026-07-21): Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 33 - 0.
The Framers
“Founders’ Verdict”
Confidence 0.75
Synthesis
The bill is constitutional only if it is narrowly tailored to address specific, demonstrable harms and includes adequate procedural safeguards, and respects the enumerated powers of Congress and the First Amendment right of association.
Congress possesses broad authority to regulate labor relations and union activities under the Commerce Clause, as labor disputes and union operations substantially affect interstate commerce. The Necessary and Proper Clause further empowers Congress to enact laws that are appropriate to carry out such regulation. However, any legislation that restricts union membership or access to union power must be carefully tailored to avoid infringing upon the First Amendment right of association, which protects the freedom of individuals to join together for collective bargaining and other lawful purpose…
This bill, by restricting union power, infringes upon the right of the people to peaceably assemble and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances, as secured by the First Amendment. Furthermore, it exceeds the enumerated powers of Congress under Article I, Section 8, as labor relations are not among the powers delegated to the federal government, and are thus reserved to the States or to the people under the Tenth Amendment.
The constitutionality of this bill depends on whether it falls within the enumerated powers of Congress under the Commerce Clause and does not infringe upon rights protected by the First Amendment. Congress may regulate labor unions under the Commerce Clause if their activities substantially affect interstate commerce, as established in the National Labor Relations Act. However, any restriction on union membership or leadership must be narrowly tailored to a legitimate government interest, such as preventing fraud or abuse, and must not unduly burden the right of association. If the bill targe…
The constitutionality of this bill depends upon whether it is a proper exercise of the power of Congress to regulate commerce among the several states, as defined by the Commerce Clause, and whether it is necessary and proper for carrying into execution that power. If the bill restricts union participation based on conduct that substantially affects interstate commerce, and if it does not exceed the scope of implied powers as recognized in McCulloch v. Maryland, then it may be constitutional. However, if it intrudes upon powers reserved to the states by the Tenth Amendment or lacks a sufficien…
What should pass
“AI Consensus Solution”
No solution yet
Daily synthesis runs at 06:00 UTC. This bill's consensus draft will appear on the next pass.